Research on the influence of "Siege" and "Green House" effects in science parks on enterprises' innovation

Abstract

Abstract: As a social experiment of technology, the practice for our establishingscience parks may or may not succeed. This paper uses 457 high technology enterprises' questionnaire data in 8 domestic science parks to have researches on the influence of Science Parks' "Green House Effect", "Siege Effect" and high enterprises' strategy on innovation performance, and the research finds that: the domestic Science Parks' "Green House Effect" and "Siege Effect" coexist, and the main effect is obvious, but the high-tech enterprises' strategy can promote the positive effect of "Green House Effect" on innovation, and organization strategy can negatively regulates the effect of Science Parks' "Siege Effect" on enterprise innovation. Based on the conclusion, the paper also put forward some policy suggestions for the government departments and high-tech enterprises in science parks.

Key words: science park, Siege Effect, Green House Effect, enterprise strategy, innovation performanc

CLC Number:

F425

Yang Zhenning, Li Donghong, Wang Yurong. Research on the influence of "Siege" and "Green House" effects in science parks on enterprises' innovation[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(1): 34-42.

References

[1] Mariagrazia Squicciarini. Science parks' tenant versus out-of-park firms: Who innovates more? a duration model [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2008, 33: 45-71. [2] Clark, W.W. Science parks: Theory and background [J]. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization, 2003, 2: 50-78. [3] Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. R&D networks and product innovation patterns: Academic and nonacademic new technology-based firms on science parks [J]. Technovation, 2005, 25: 1025-1037. [4] Lindelöf, P., &, Löfsten, H. Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: University industry links for technology transfer [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2004, 29: 311-326. [5] Ferguson, R., & Olofsson C. Science parks and the development of NTBFs: Location, survival and growth [J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2004, 29: 5-17. [6] Link, A.N., Scott, J.T. Science parks and the generation of university-based knowledge: An exploratory study [J]. Int. J. Ind. Organ, 2003, 21 (9): 1323-1356. [7] Rickne, A. New technology-based firms and industrial dynamics: Evidence from the technology system of biomaterials in sweden, ohio and massachusetts [D]. Gothenburg: Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology. [8] Grayson, L. Science parks: An experiment in high technology transfer [M]. London: The British Library, 1993. [9] Westhead, P., Storey, D.J. An assessment of firms located on and off science parks in the united kingdom [M]. HMSO, London, 1994. [10] Davidsson, P., B. Kirchhoff, A. Hatemi-J, and H. Gustavasson. Empirical analysis of business growth factors using swedish data [J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2002, 40(4): 332-349. [11] Olofsson, C. and C. Wahlbin. Firms started by university researchers in sweden-roots, roles, relations, and growth patterns [C]. Paper Presented at the 1993 Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Howston, TX, March, 25-27, 1993. [12] 杨震宁,吴杰. 不同功能分类科技园的资源供给差异研究 [J]. 科研管理,2011(9):35-43.Yang Zhenning, Wu Jie. The resources supplies' difference by different functional science parks [J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 9(32): 35-43. [13] Massey, D., Quintas, P., & Wield, D. High-tech Fantasies. Science parks in society, science and space [M]. London: Routledge, 1992. [14] Bakouros, Y.L., Marda, D.C., Varsakelis, N.C. Science park, a high-tech fantasy?: An analysis of the science parks of greece [J]. Technovation, 2002, 22: 123-128. [15] Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. Innovation and growth in the global economy [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991. [16] Ottaviano, G. I. P., and J.F. Thisse. On economic geography in economic theory: Increasing returns and pecuniary externalities [J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2001, 1: 153-179. [17] 刘雯雯,杨震宁,王以华. 科技园区服务创新、企业入驻动机和企业绩效的关系研究:一个整合模型 [J]. 科学学研究,2009(5):783-792.Liu Wenwen, Yang Zhenning, Wang Yihua. Management innovation in science parks, strategic motivation and enterprises' innovation achievements: A integrative model [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2009, 5(27): 783-792. [18] 陆雄文,孙金云. 企业的核心能力与模仿式创新路径-新兴国家的视角 [J]. 经济理论与经济管理,2011(4):64-71.Lu Xiongwen, Sun Jinyun. A study on core competence and innovation path: From the perspective of emerging economy [J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2011, 4(31): 64-71. [19] 肖绍平,邓超. 双寡头核心能力发展竞争、学习追赶与核心能力均衡 [J]. 管理评论,2011(4):87-96.Xiao Shaoping, Deng Chao. The duopoly's game of core capability development, following strategy by learning and the equilibrium of core capability [J]. Management Review, 2011, 4(23): 87-96. [20] Francis C.C. Koh, Winston T.H. Koh, Feichin Ted Tschang. An analytical framework for science parks and technology districts with an application to singapore [J]. Journal of Business Venturing 2005, 20: 217-239. [21] F. Xavier Molina-Morales. The territorial agglomerations of firms: A social capital perspective from the spanish tile industry [J]. Growth and Change, 2005, 1(36): 74-99. [22] Scott B Droege, Jenny M Hoobler. Employee turnover and tacit knowledge diffusion: A network perspective [J]. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2005, 1: 54-60. [23] Davis Donald and D. Weinstein. Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: An empirical assessment [J]. Journal of International Economics, 2003, 59(1):1-23. [24] 杨震宁,李东红. 中国制造业企业创新:行业竞争,嵌入集群的社会资本与技术战略选择 [J]. 财贸经济,2010(6):98-105.Yang Zhenning, Li Donghong. Enterprises' innovation in manufacturing industry: Competition, social capital embedded in the cluster and technical strategy choice [J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2010, 6: 98-105. [25] Tijssen, R. J.W. Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows [J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30:35-54.