Research on triple helix synergetic innovation capability evaluation based on regional industry interaction

Abstract

Abstract: The enterprise dimension of triple helix model can be divided into two subclasses which have different feature and interactive evolution: producer services and manufacturing industry. Based on SCP analytical paradigm, on the basis of analyzing the synergetic innovation structure and behavior of the two parallel triple helixes of "university-government-producer services" and "university-government-manufacturing", by synergetic degree measurement model of composite system, we completed the theoretical deduction and case study of triple helix synergetic innovation capability evaluating method based on regional industry interaction. It is found that regional synergetic innovation capability evaluating technique of using these two parallel triple helixes can enrich the triple helix theoretical system in theory and offer more detailed decision reference information for promoting regional synergetic innovation capability in practice.

Key words: industry interaction, triple helix, synergetic innovation capability, evaluation

CLC Number:

F062.9

Kang Jian, Hu Zuguang. Research on triple helix synergetic innovation capability evaluation based on regional industry interaction[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(5): 19-26.

References

[1] 山东省商务厅.韩国将实施技术产权保护法[EB/OL].http://www.shandongbusiness.gov.cn/index/content/sid/29349.html,2007. [2] 李明德.巴西科技体制的发展和研发体系[J].拉丁美洲研究,2004(3):27-32. [3] 张义明.印度在国际科技合作中的知识产权保护[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2002(12):12-13. [4] Zeebroeck N.Patents only live twice:a patent survival analysis in Europe.CEB Working Paper,October 2007. [5] Rivette K G,Kline D.Rembrandts in the Attic:unlocking the hidden value of patents[M].Harvard University Press,Boston,2000. [6] Gans J S,Hsu D H,Stern S.The impact of uncertain intellectual property rights on the market for ideas:Evidence from patent grant delays[J].Management Science,2008,54(5):982-997. [7] Day G S,Schoemaker P J H.Scanning the periphery[J].Harvard Business Review,2005,78(2):66-76. [8] Christensen C M,Overdorf M.Meeting the challenge of disruptive change[J].Harvard Business Review,2000,78(2):66-76. [9] Gray P H,Meister D B.Knowledge sourcing methods[J].Information Management,2006,43(2):142-156. [10] Harhoff D,Wagner S.Modeling the duration of patent examination at the European patent office[R].CEPR Discussion Paper 5283,Centre for Economic Policy Research,London,2005. [11] Graevenitz G,Wagner S,Hoisl K,Hall B,Harhoff D,Giuri P,Gambardella A.The strategic use of patents and its implications for enterprise and competition policies.Report for the European Commission,European Commission,Brussels,2007. [12] McGuinley C.Global patent warming[J].Intellectual Asset Magazine,2008,31,24-30. [13] Hall B,Ziedonis R.An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry,1979-1995[J].RAND Journal of Economics,2001,32(1):101-128. [14] Guellec D,Pottelsberghe B.Applications,grants and the value of patent[J].Economic Letters,2000,69(1):109-114. [15] Kiige C J.The ARIPO patent search,examination and documentation procedures[J].World Patent Information,1992,14(1):5-7. [16] Shanghai Patent Agency.Procedures in the Chinese patent office.Notes on what to do after an application for a patent for invention has passed the preliminary examination stage at the Chinese patent office[J].World Patent Information,1989,11(2):93-94. [17] Steffek R.The rules concerning translations in the European patent grant procedure[J].World Patent Information,1981,3(3):139. [18] Shen J.The successful beginning of publication of Chinese patent documents[J].World Patent Information,1986,8(1):8-19. [19] Nakata Y,Zhang X.A survival analysis of patent examination request in Japanese electrical and electronic manufacturers.Working Paper,Doshisha University,Okayama University,2009. [20] Poirier D J.Partial observability in bivariate probit models[J].Journal of Econometrics,1980,12:210-217. [21] 张古鹏,陈向东.基于专利的中外新兴产业创新质量差异研究[J].科学学研究,2012,29(12):1813-1820.