Based on the theses, the heterogeneity of team knowledge is divided into explicit knowledge heterogeneity, the pseudo tacit knowledge heterogeneity, and the true tacit knowledge heterogeneity. And the relationship between team interaction and the team’s innovation performance is studied. Empirical results show that team explicit knowledge heterogeneity is insignificant to the innovation performance; the pseudo tacit knowledge heterogeneity has a significant positive influence on team communication, team knowledge sharing, work conflict, teamwork, and ultimately promoting the innovation team performance; the true tacit knowledge heterogeneity impedes knowledge sharing, leading to the team interpersonal conflicts, and hindering the team innovation. Regulating variable analysis shows that the team trust is able to significantly adjust the impact relationship between the team communication, knowledge sharing, interpersonal conflict, work conflict, teamwork, and innovation performance.
Key words
team /
interdisciplinary cross innovation team /
knowledge heterogeneity /
innovation performance
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] Hollenbeck JR, etc. Structural contingency theory and individual differences: examination of external and internalperson team fit [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002, (87): 599-606.
[2] Wiersema,M. F. and Bantel, K.A.Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change[J].Academy of Management Journal,1992,35(1):91-121.
[3] Rodan,S. and Galunic, C. More than Network Structure: How Knowledge Heterogeneity Influences Managerial Performance and Innovativeness[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2004,25(6):541-562.
[4] 古家军,胡蓓.TMT知识结构、职业背景的异质性与企业技术创新绩效关系[J].研究与发展管理,2008(2):28-33.
[5] 谢凤华,姚先国.高层管理团队异质性与企业技术创新绩效关系的实证研究[J].科研管理,2008(6):65;73.
[6] 倪旭东,知识异质性对团队创新的作用机制研究[J],企业经济,2010(08):57-63.
[7] Pelled,L. H, Eisenhardt,K.M. Exploring The Black Box: An Analysis Of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(1):1-28.
[8] 郑小勇,娄鞅,科研团队创新绩效的影响因素及其作用机理研究[J]. 科学学研究,2009(9):1428-1438.
[9] 柳洲,陈士俊,王洁. 论跨学科创新团队的异质性知识耦合[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2008(06):188;191.
[10] 杨俊等,创新还是模仿:创业团队经验异质性与冲突特征的角色[J].管理世界,2010(3):84-96.
[11] 汪应洛, 知识的转移特性研究[J], 系统工程理论与实践, 2002(10):8-11.
[12] Marks M A, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro S. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes[J]. Academy of Management Review,2001, 26: 356;376.
[13] 刘电芝. 团队互动过程研究述评,应用心理学[J]. 2008(14): 091-096.
[14] 刘雪峰. 模拟情境中工作团队成员互动过程的初步研究及其测量[J],心理学报,2005,37(2): 253-259.
[15] 马宁,官建成. 影响我国工业企业技术创新绩效的关键因素[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2000(3):17-20.
[16] 陈劲,陈钰芬. 企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3):86-91.
[17] Amason,A.C. Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving A Paradox for Top Management Teams [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,39(1):123-148.
[18] Van Der Vegt, G. S. and Bunderson, J.S.Learning and Performance in Multidisciplinary Teams: The Importance of Collective Team Identification [J]. Academy of Management Journal,2005,48(3):532-547.
PDF(956 KB)
