The influence of gender diversity on group performance and creativity

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to examine the main effect of gender diversity on the group performance and creativity and to explore the moderation role of group longevity in Chinese context. By using 146 work groups from pharmaceutical and telecom companies, the hypotheses are tested via factor analysis, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. The results show that (1) gender diversity has a positive effect on group performance and creativity; (2) gender diversity has a less positive effect on group creativity when group longevity is high, however it does not have such effect on the group performance. A survey investigation on 233 workplace employees is also conducted and six undergraduate-team cases are analyzed to demonstrate that individuals generated gender roles and complementary differences on interaction style based on gender itself and the social comparison behaviors across gender is fewer than that within the gender, the fact supports the theorization. The results enrich gender diversity research and provide valuable insights into organizational management practices.

Key words: gender diversity, group performance, group creativity, group longevity, gender role

CLC Number:

F270. 7

Zhang Yan, Zhang Zhen. The influence of gender diversity on group performance and creativity[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(3): 81-88.

References

[1] 国家统计局 . http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2008/ indexch.htm , 2008. [2] Jackson, S., Joshi, A. Diversity in social context: a multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25: 675-702. [3] Joshi, A., Liao, H., Jackson, S. Cross-level effects of workplace diversity on sales performance and pay [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49: 459-481. [4] Kanter, R. M. Men and women of the corporation [M]. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc, 1977. [5] Ali, M., Kulik, C. T., Metz, I. The impact of gender diversity on performance in services and manufacturing organizations . Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 2009. [6] Pearsall, M. J., Ellis, P. J., Evans, J. M., Unlocking the Effects of Gender Faultlines on Team Creativity: Is Activation the Key [J]? Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008, 93: 225-234. [7] Berscheid, E., Reis, H. Attraction and close relationships[J]. The handbook of social psychology, 1998, 2: 193-281. [8] Tajfel, H., Turner, J. The social identity of intergroup behavior . In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology and intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986: 7-24. [9] Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., Florey, A. T., Time, teams, and task performance: changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45: 1029-1045. [10] Joshi, A., Roh, H., The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52: 599-627. [11] Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., Xin, K. R., Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44: 1-28. [12] Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Bell, M. P., Beyond relational demography: time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41: 96-107. [13] van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M. C., Work group diversity [J]. Annual of Review of Psychology, 2007, 58: 515-541. [14] Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A., Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research [J]. Research in Organization Behavior, 1998, 20: 77-140. [15] Festinger, L., A theory of social comparison processes [J]. Human Relations, 1954, 7: 117-140. [16] Wood, W., Meta-analytic review of sex differences in group performance [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1987, 102: 53-71. [17] Eagly, A. H., Steffen, V. J., Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1986, 100: 309-330. [18] Eagly, A. H., Wood, W. Explaining Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Meta-analytic Perspective [J]. Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 17: 306-315. [19] Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., Martell, R. F., Simon, M. C. Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74: 935-942. [20] Feingold, A., Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1994, 116: 429-456. [21] Miller, G. T., Self-schemas, gender, and social comparison: A clarification of the related attributes hypothesis [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46: 1222-1229. [22] Suls, J., Gastorf, J., Lawhon, J., Social comparison choices for evaluating a sex-and age-related ability [J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1978, 4: 102-105. [23] Mischel, L. J., Northcraft, G. B., think we can, I think we can…: The role of self-efficacy beliefs in group and team effectiveness [M], Advances in Group Processes, Greenwich, CT: JAI, 1997 14: 177-197. [24] Stapel, D. A., Koomen, W., Competition, cooperation, and the effects of others on me [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005, 88: 1029-1038. [25] Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., Herron, M. Assessing the work environment for creativity [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39: 1154-1184. [26] Kreuger, J., Rothbart, M. Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 55: 187-195. [27] Bodenhausen, G. V., Lichtenstein, M., Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: The impact of task complexity [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52: 871-880. [28] Jackson, S. E., Stone, V. K., Alvarez, E. B., Socialization amidst diversity: Impact of demographics on work team oldtimers and newcomers [M]. Research in organizational behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1993, 15: 45-109. [29] Stangor, C., Lynch, L., Duan, C., Glass, B., Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 62: 207-218. [30] Brislin, R. W., Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. Handbook of Cross-Culture Psychology-methodology [M], Boston: Allan & Bacon, Inc, 1980, 83: 339-444. [31] Allison, P. D., Measures of inequality [J]. American Sociological Review, 1978, 43: 865-880. [32] Li, J. T., Hambrick, D. C., Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48: 794-813. [33] Teachman, J. D., Analysis of population diversity [J]. Sociological Methods and Research, 1980, 8: 341-362. [34] Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M., Mount, M. K., Relating member ability and personality to work team processes and team effectiveness [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83: 377-391. [35] Anderson, N. R., West, M. A., Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1998, 19: 235-258. [36] Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., Higgs, A. C. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1993, 46: 823-850. [37] Withey, M. J., Daft, R. L., Cooper, W. H., Measures of Perrow's work unit technology: An empirical assessment and a new scale [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26: 45-63. [38] Earley, P. C., Lee, C., Hanson, L. A., Joint moderating effects of job experience and task component complexity: Relations among goal setting, task strategies, and performance [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1990, 11: 3-15. [39] Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives [J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1-55. [40] Aiken, L. S., West, S. G.., Multiple regression: Testing and. interpreting interactions [M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991. [41] Biernat, M. Gender Stereotypes and the Relationship Between Masculinity and Femininity: A Developmental Analysis [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 61: 351-365. [42] Carli, L. L. Gender differences in interaction style and influence [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 56: 565-576.