Impacts and mechanisms of digital transformation of supply chain core enterprises on SME innovation

Yuan Yehu, Sun Yanping

Science Research Management ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 12-21.

PDF(1046 KB)
PDF(1046 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 12-21. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.06.002

Impacts and mechanisms of digital transformation of supply chain core enterprises on SME innovation

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The innovation output of Chinese SMEs is far less than that of large enterprises, and how to enhance the innovation capacity of SMEs in the context of the era of digital economy has become an urgent issue for the theoretical and practical circles. Starting from the supply chain perspective, this paper explored the impact and mechanism of digital transformation of core enterprises on the innovation capacity of upstream and downstream SMEs based on the supply chain data of listed companies from 2007 to 2020. It was found in the study that (1) the digital transformation of core enterprises can significantly enhance the innovation capability of upstream and downstream SMEs, and the conclusion still holds after a series of robustness tests. (2) Mechanism tests proved that the digital transformation of core enterprises can generate three kinds of spillovers through the supply chain, namely financial spillovers, transformation spillovers and innovation spillovers, which affect the innovation level of upstream and downstream SMEs. (3) Heterogeneity analyses found out that core enterprises' digital transformation promotes SMEs' innovation capability more significantly when the SMEs are non-state-owned or high-tech enterprises. The findings of this paper will enrich the empirical evidence of supply chain spillovers and provide a new theoretical basis and operational ideas for SMEs to enhance their innovation capacity.

Key words

digital transformation / SME innovation / spillover effect of the supply chain

Cite this article

Download Citations
Yuan Yehu , Sun Yanping. Impacts and mechanisms of digital transformation of supply chain core enterprises on SME innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(6): 12-21 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.06.002

References

[1]
池毛毛, 叶丁菱, 王俊晶, 等. 我国中小制造企业如何提升新产品开发绩效:基于数字化赋能的视角[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(3):63-75.
CHI Maomao, YE Dingling, WANG Junjing, et al. How can Chinese small- and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises improve the new product development (NPD) performance? From the perspective of digital empowerment[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2020, 23(3):63-75.
[2]
王慧, 夏天添, 马勇, 等. 中小企业数字化转型如何提升创新效率? 基于经验取样法的调查[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(18):168-174.
WANG Hui, XIA Tiantian, MA Yong, et al. How does the digital transformation of small & medium-sized enterprises improve innovation efficiency:Evidence from experience sample methods[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2021, 41(18):168-174.
[3]
陆岷峰. 关于我国中小微企业健康生态培育与数字化应用研究[J]. 兰州学刊, 2022, 1(3):52-61.
LU Minfeng. Research on healthy ecological cultivation and digital application of small,medium and micro enterprises in China[J]. Lanzhou Academic Journal, 2022, 1(3):52-61.
[4]
薛海燕, 张信东, 贺亚楠. 转板能促进中小企业创新吗?:来自新三板转板企业的新证据[J]. 中国软科学, 2023, 1(3):123-139.
XUE Haiyan, ZHANG Xindong, HE Yanan. Can switching market promote innovation of SMEs?New evidence from NEEQ companies[J]. China Soft Science, 2023, 1(3):123-139.
[5]
王伟楠, 王凯, 严子淳. 区域高质量发展对“专精特新”中小企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44 (2):32-44.
WANG Weinan, WANG Kai, YAN Zichun. Research on the influence mechanism of regional high-quality development on innovation performance of "SRDI" small-and medium-sized enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44 (2):32-44.
[6]
中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组. 产业链链长的理论内涵及其功能实现[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022, 1(7):5-24.
Research Group of the Institute of industrial Economics of CASS, Institute of Industrial Economics CASS. The theoretical connotation of the central enterprise as the chain leader of industry chain and the function realization[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022, 1(7):5-24.
[7]
黄节根, 吉祥熙, 李元旭. 数字化水平对企业创新绩效的影响研究:来自沪深A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 江西社会科学, 2021, 41(5):61-72+254-255.
HUANG Jiegen, JI Xiangxi, LI Yuanxu. An empirical study on the impact of digital level on enterprise innovation performance evidence from A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen[J]. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 2021, 41(5):61-72+254-255.
[8]
聂军. 数字化转型、社会责任履行与企业技术创新绩效[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2023, 1(1):50-54.
NIE Jun. Digital transformation,corporate social responsibility and innovation performance[J]. Journal of Technical Economics & Management, 2023, 1(1):50-54.
[9]
楼润平, 张昊, 麦诗诗. 制造业企业数字化投资与创新绩效:人力资本的中介作用[J]. 海南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 1(6):1-13.
LOU Runping, ZHANG Hao, MAI Shishi. Digitalization investment and innovation performance in the manufacturing enterprises:The intermediary role of human capital[J]. Journal of Hainan University(Humanities & Social Sciences), 2021, 1(6):1-13.
[10]
杜勇, 黄丹华. “同命相连”:供应链网络中企业数字化转型的同群效应[J]. 财经科学, 2023, 1(3):74-92.
DU Yong, HUANG Danhua. Connected with the life: Research on the peer effect of enterprise digital transformation in supply chain network[J]. Finance & Economics, 2023, 1(3):74-92.
[11]
赵宸宇. 数字化转型对企业社会责任的影响研究[J]. 当代经济科学, 2022, 44(2):109-116.
ZHAO Chenyu. Research on the impact of digital transformation on corporate social responsibility[J]. Modern Economic Science, 2022, 44(2):109-116.
[12]
陈剑, 刘运辉. 数智化使能运营管理变革:从供应链到供应链生态系统[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(11):227-240+14.
CHEN Jian, LIU Yunhui. Operations management innovation enabled by digitalization and intellectualization:From supply chain to supply chain ecosystem[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(11):227-240+14.
[13]
陈庆江, 王彦萌, 万茂丰. 企业数字化转型的同群效应及其影响因素研究[J]. 管理学报, 2021, 18(5):653-663.
Abstract
以2008~2019年中国A股制造业上市公司数据为基础,通过分析师跟踪网络识别同群群体,并利用面板固定效应模型等方法,考察企业数字化转型中的同群效应以及这种企业间行为互动的影响因素。研究发现:企业数字化转型过程中存在显著的同群效应;受模仿学习的主观动机与现实条件两方面因素共同影响,数字化转型的同群效应在资源基础和动态能力处于中间水平的企业中更为显著;网络嵌入、市场竞争以及环境不确定性均会强化企业数字化转型的同群效应;同群效应引发了群体成员数字化转型水平的向上趋同。
CHEN Qingjiang, WANG Yanmeng, WAN Maofeng. Research on peer effect of enterprise digital transformation and influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2021, 18(5):653-663.
Based on the data of China’s A-share manufacturing listed companies of the year from 2008 to 2019, this paper identifies the peer group through analysts’tracking network, and investigates the peer effect and the influencing factors of this social interact in the digital transformation of enterprises by using panel fixed effect model and other methods. The study shows that: there is a significant peer effect in the enterprise’s digital transformation; influenced by both the subjective motivation of imitation learning and realistic conditions, the peer effect of digital transformation is more significant in the enterprises whose resource base and dynamic capacity are in the middle level; network embedding, market competition, and environmental uncertainty strengthen the peer effect of enterprise digital transformation; the peer group effect leads to the upward convergence of digital transformation level.
[14]
ROGERS E M. Diffusion of Innovations[M]. New York: The Free Press, 1962.
[15]
肖红军, 阳镇, 刘美玉. 企业数字化的社会责任促进效应:内外双重路径的检验[J]. 经济管理, 2021, 43(11):52-69.
XIAO Hongjun, YANG Zhen, LIU Meiyu. The promotion effect of corporate digitalization on corporate social responsibility:A test of internal and external dual paths[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2021, 43(11):52-69.
[16]
卢强, 刘贝妮, 宋华. 协同创新对中小企业供应链融资绩效的影响:信号理论视角[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2021, 33(6):87-99.
LU Qiang, LIU Beini, SONG Hua. lmpact of collaborative innovation on supply chain financing of SMEs: A signaling theory perspective[J]. R&D Management, 2021, 33(6):87-99.
[17]
祁怀锦, 魏禹嘉, 刘艳霞. 企业数字化转型与商业信用供给[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(12):158-184.
QI Huaijin, WEI Yujia, LIU Yanxia. Corporate digital transformation and trade credit supply[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2022, 44(12):158-184.
[18]
申明浩, 谭伟杰, 张文博. 数字化转型增进了企业社会责任履行吗?[J]. 西部论坛, 2022, 32(3):63-80.
SHEN Minghao, TAN Weijie, ZHANG Wenbo. Has digital transformation promoted the fulfillment of corporate social responsibility?[J]. West Forum, 2022, 32(3):63-80.
[19]
刘任重, 高珊. 核心企业信用评级对供应链金融ABS发行定价影响的实证研究[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2022, 1(2):32-42.
LIU Renzhong, GAO Shan. The influence of credit rating of core enterprises on interest spread of supply chain finance asset-backed securities by empirical analysis[J]. Financial Theory & Practice, 2022, 1(2):32-42.
[20]
杨金玉, 彭秋萍, 葛震霆. 数字化转型的客户传染效应:供应商创新视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022, 1(8):156-174.
YANG Jinyu, PENG Qiuping, GE Zhenting. Spillover effect of digital transformation along the supply chain:The perspective of supplier innovation[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022, 1(8):156-174.
[21]
贺俊, 国旭. 创新平台开放战略研究的最新进展与发现[J]. 齐鲁学刊, 2022, 1(2):119-131.
HE Jun, GUO Xu. Frontiers and findings of the studies on opening strategy of innovation platforms[J]. Qilu Journal, 2022, 1(2):119-131.
[22]
罗雄艳. 核心企业开展供应链金融业务探析[J]. 财务与会计, 2021, 1(12):70-71.
LUO Xiongyan. Exploration of supply chain finance business by core enterprises[J]. Finance & Accounting, 2021, 1(12):70-71.
[23]
吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现:来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 1(7):130-144.
WU Fei, HU Huizhi, LIN Huiyan, et al. Enterprise digital transformation and capital market performance:Empirical evidence from stock liquidity[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 1(7):130-144.
[24]
KARHADE P P, QI D J. Information technology investment and commercialized innovation performance:Dynamic adjustment costs and curvilinear impacts[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2021, 45(3):1007-1024.
Firms’ investment in information technology (IT) has been widely considered to be a key enabler of innovation. In this study, we integrate prior findings on the augmenting pathways (where IT investment supports innovation) with a new theory explaining the suppressing pathways (where dynamic adjustment costs associated with large IT investment can be detrimental to innovation) to propose an overall inverted U-shaped relationship between IT investment and commercialized innovation performance (CIP). To test our theory, we analyze a unique panel dataset from the largest economy in Europe and discovered a curvilinear relationship between IT investment and CIP for firms across a broad spectrum of industries. Our research presents empirical evidence corroborating the augmenting and suppressing pathways linking IT investment and CIP. Our findings serve as a cautionary signal to executives, discouraging overinvestment in IT.
[25]
WANG J C, YI Jingtao, ZHANG Xiuping, et al. Pyramidal ownership and SOE innovation[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2022, 59(7):1839-1868.
PDF(1046 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/