A study on the evaluation of the satisfaction of researchers on the implementation of fundamental research funds policy for China′s national research institutes

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.02.007

Abstract

Abstract: Fundamental Research Funds (FRF) represents one type of science and technology block grant policies in China, aiming to address the challenges of the current research funding mode dominated by competitive project funding, characterized by excessive competition and insufficient stability; and to support national research institutions and universities in conducting cutting-edge topic research and cultivating outstanding talents as the startup and leveraged funding. Based on a policy assessment perspective, this paper constructs a satisfaction analysis model for the FRF policy implementation, grounded in the dual-factor theory of motivation and hygiene. Employing a dataset comprising 4,016 survey responses, the study leverages multiple linear regression and textual analysis to examine the factors influencing policy implementation satisfaction and to suggest policy implications. The results of the multiple linear regression analysis indicated: (1) a positive relationship between the FRF amount obtained by researchers and their satisfaction with policy implementation; (2) among the low-satisfaction group, a negative relationship between funding pressure and the satisfaction with FRF policy implementation; (3) a negative relationship between researchers′ age and satisfaction with FRF policy implementation; and (4) a negative relationship between researchers′ job ranks and satisfaction with FRF policy implementation.Textual analysis revealed that: (1) the entire sample group agreed on the necessity for an increased amount of FRF funding, to fully leverage its startup mechanism and allocate the funding catering to practical needs; (2) the high-satisfaction group suggested to set up a reward-and-punishment mechanism and advocates more investment in major research equipment and platforms; and (3) the low-satisfaction group focused more on the justification and fairness of the policy implementation.Lastly, the paper proposed the following policy implications based on the research findings: (1) further optimization of the FRF distribution patterns and alignment research projects with national strategic needs; (2) emphasis on the startup and leveraging roles of FRF, targeting at key groups; and (3) ensuing transparency in project management and processes.

Key words: fundamental research funds, satisfaction evaluation, policy evaluation

Wu Cong, Aruhan, Zhu Leina. A study on the evaluation of the satisfaction of researchers on the implementation of fundamental research funds policy for China′s national research institutes[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(2): 61-69.

References

[1] 侯建国. 自觉履行高水平科技自立自强的使命担当[EB/OL]. 2022-09 [2022-10-25]. http://www.qstheory.cn/dukan/qs/2022-05/01/c_1128607102.htm.
HOU Jianguo. Consciously fulfil the mission of high-level technological self-reliance and self-improvement[EB/OL]. 2022-09 [2022-10-25]. http://www.qstheory.cn/dukan/qs/2022-05/01/c_1128607102.htm.
[2] 习近平.习近平谈治国理政第四卷[M]. 外文出版社, 2022.
Xi Jinping. Xi Jinping: The governance of China IV[M].Foreign Languages Press, 2022.
[3] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 习近平主持召开中央财经领导小组第七次会议[EB/OL]. 2014-08-18[2022-10-25]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2014-08/18/content_2736502.htm.
Central Government of China. Xi Jinping presides over the seventh meeting of the Central Financial and Economic Leading Group[EB/OL]. 2014-08-18[2022-10-25]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2014-08/18/content_2736502.htm.
[4] 罗珵.竞争还是稳定:国外科研经费资助方式和结构综述[J].中国科技论坛,2020,(04):19-29.
LUO Cheng. Competitive or block funding: a literature review of international scientific research funding model and structure[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2020,(04):19-29.
[5] 阿儒涵,王诗航,李晓轩.稳定拨款与项目资助的资助差异性研究——基于2009-2018日本化学领域资助产出的数据分析[J].科学学研究,2021,39(06):1067-1073.
A Ruhan, WANG Shihang, LI Xiaoxuan. Research on the funding difference between block grant and project funding-Based on the data analysis of funding output in chemistry from Japan during 2009-2018[J]. Studies in Science of Science,2021,39(06):1067-1073.
[6] 贾雯晴,俞建飞.科研经费长期稳定支持与高校科技原始创新——基于中央高校基本科研业务费的准实验考察[J/OL].研究与发展管理:1-13[2022-10-21].DOI:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20211215.
JIA Wenqing, YU Jianfei. Long-term and stable support of research funds and its connection with original innovation ability—Quasi-experimental Research of Basic Research Funds for Central Universities[J/OL].R&D Management:1-13[2022-10-21].DOI:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20211215.
[7] 中共中央. 中共中央关于科学技术体制改革的决定（1985年3月13日中发[1985]6号）[EB/OL]. 1985-3-13.[2022-10-25].
Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on the Reform of the Science and Technology System[EB/OL]. 1985[2022-10-25]. http://kjt.guizhou.gov.cn/zwgk/xxgkml/zcwj/gzdfzc/201801/t20180124_16172688.html.
[8] Bai A, Wu C, Yang K. Evolution and Features of China’s Central Government Funding System for Basic Research[J]. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2021, 6.
[9] 蔡爱惠.试论竞争性与非竞争性二元结构的高校科研资助体系[J].中国行政管理,2012,(05):68-71.
CAI Aihui The Dual system of Financial Support for University R&D: Rivalrousness and Non-Rivalrousness[J].Chinese Public Administration, 2012,(05):68-71.
[10] 财政部教育部. 关于印发《中央高校基本科研业务费管理办法》的通知(财教[2021]283号)[EB/OL]. 2021-11-30.[2022-10-25]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-12/14/content_5660674.htm.
Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Education. Management Measures of Fundamental Research Funds on Central Universities. [EB/OL]. 2021-11-30.[2022-10-25]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-12/14/content_5660674.htm.
[11] 财政部教育部. 关于印发《中央高校基本科研业务费管理办法》的通知(财教[2016]277号)[EB/OL]. 2016-09-22.[2022-10-25]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2017/content_5199965.htm
Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Education. Management Measures of Fundamental Research Funds on Central Universities. [EB/OL]. 2016-09-22.[2022-10-25]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2017/content_5199965.htm
[12] 财政部教育部. 关于印发《中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金管理办法》的通知（财教[2016]268号）[EB/OL]. 2016-07-19. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-07/27/content_5095236.htm
Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Education. Management Measures of Special Funding of Fundamental Research Funds on Central Research Institutes. [EB/OL]. 2016-07-19. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-07/27/content_5095236.htm
[13] 陈柳,姜伟,刘彬等.新时代青年科技人才培养模式探索——以中央高校基本科研业务费的实施为视角[J].中国高校科技,2018,(05):12-14.
CHEN Liu, JIANG Wei, LIU Bin, et al. Exploration on the training mode of young scientific and technological talents in the new era -- from the perspective of the implementation of the basic scientific research business fees of central universities [J]. China University Science and Technology, 2018, (05): 12-14
[14] 张勋.行业特色型高校基础科研成效研究——以北京交通大学为例[J].科研管理,2019,40(12):323-326.
ZHANG Xun. A research on the effectiveness of basic scientific research of industry － specific universities by taking Beijing Jiaotong University as an example. Science Research Management,2019,40(12):323-326.
[15] 伏琳,欧阳国桢,胡燕娟等.中央高校科研基本业务费管理政策研究[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(16):45-49.
FU Lin, OUYANG Guozhen, HU Yanjuan, et al. Research on Management Policy of Basic Service Fee of Scientific Research in Central University[J].Science and Technology Management Research,2016,36(16):45-49.
[16] 梁巍,陈雷,杨洪国.林业科研院所基本科研业务费专项管理实践探析——以中国林业科学研究院本级为例[J].科研管理,2017,38(S1):738-744.
LIANG Wei, CHEN Lei, YANG Hongguo. An analysis of the management of fundamental research funds in forestry research institutes by taking Chinese Academy of Forestry as an example[J].Science Research Management,2017,38(S1):738-744.
[17] 张晓泉,石明桢,赵闰.中央级科研院所基本科研业务费专项实施情况分析研究[J].科技管理研究,2012,32(05):158-162.
ZHANG Xiaoquan, SHI Mingzhen, ZHAO Run. Analysis and Study on Fundamental Research Funds of Management of Central Agriculture Scientific Research Institutions[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2012,32(05):158-162.
[18] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 习近平强调，坚持科技是第一生产力人才是第一资源创新是第一动力. [EB/OL]. 2022-10-16[2022-10-25]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/16/content_5718815.htm
Central Government of China. Xi Jinping emphasized that science and technology are the primary productive forces, talents are the primary resource and innovation is the primary driving force. [EB/OL]. 2022-10-16[2022-10-25]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/16/content_5718815.htm
[19] 中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 习近平：在科学家座谈会上的讲话.[EB/OL].2020-09-11[2022-10-25]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-09/11/content_5542862.htm
Central Government of China. Xi Jinping: Speech at the Symposium of Scientists.[EB/OL].2020-09-11[2022-10-25]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-09/11/content_5542862.htm
[20] Callaghan C W, Coldwell D. Job satisfaction and job performance: The case of research productivity[J]. Journal of Economics, 2014, 5(1): 97-113.
[21] Herzberg F. Motivation to work[M]. Routledge, 2017.
[22] 秦东方,黄戈林.高校教师聘任“非升即走”制度中的双因素理论分析[J].北京教育(高教),2022,(09):26-29.
QIN Dongfang, HUANG GeLin. Theoretical analysis of the two factors in the system of "Rise or Leave" for the appointment of college teachers [J]. Beijing Education (Higher Education), 2022, (09): 26-29
[23] 宁骚.公共政策学(第三版)[M].高等教育出版社, 2018.
Ning Sao. Public Policy (The Third Edition)[M].Higher Education Press, 2018.
[24] 巴比. 社会研究方法（第13版）[M]. 清华大学出版社, 2020.
Babbie E. The Practice of Social Research[M].Tsinghua University Press,2020.
[25] Herbert D L, Coveney J, Clarke P, et al. The impact of funding deadlines on personal workloads, stress and family relationships: a qualitative study of Australian researchers[J]. BMJ open, 2014, 4(3): e004462.
[26] 陈洪渊. 科学仪器是穷究物性、攻坚克难的利器[EB/OL]. 2019-05-31.[2022-10-25]. http://casad.cas.cn/ysdt/201905/t20190531_4693800.html
CHEN Hongyuan. Scientific instruments are sharp tools for studying physical properties and overcoming difficulties [EB/OL]. 2019-05-31.[2022-10-25]. http://casad.cas.cn/ysdt/201905/t20190531_4693800.html

A study on the evaluation of the satisfaction of researchers on the implementation of fundamental research funds policy for China′s national research institutes

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 6

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Tang Linjia, Mei Zi, Guo Yuanyuan. Research on the implementation effect of "innovation and entrepreneurship" series policies in China: A study from the perspective of policy mix effect [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(5): 34-43.
[2]	Shao Yuexin, Chen Shouming, Wang Jian. Effects of “business tax replaced with VAT” policy on innovation investment of firms:A PSM-DID approach [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(6): 77-85.
[3]	Wu Xintong, Chen Jin, Mei Liang. Gender impact assessment in innovation management and case study [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(3): 133-142.
[4]	Zhang Xun. A research on the effectiveness of basic scientific research of industry-specific universities by taking Beijing Jiaotong University as an example [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(12): 323-326.
[5]	Qu Wan1, Feng Haihong1, Hou Qinjiang2. Innovation Policy Evaluation Framework and Application in High-Tech Firms’ Tax Incentive Evaluation [J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(1): 1-11.
[6]	Zhang Junrui, Chen Yixin， Wang Fangjun. Impact of preferential income tax policy on firms’innovation efficiency [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(3): 93-100.