As a new feature of financial development, digital finance can help to break the financial exclusion that traditional financial institutions conduct to small and micro enterprises, alleviate the misallocation of financial resources, reduce the enterprise cost of borrowing, and diversify R&D risks. Thus, it will stimulate technological innovation of enterprises and inevitably affect industrial development. Especially in the context of the new technological revolution and industrial transformation marked by digital technology, it is of great practical significance to explore whether digital finance stimulates technological innovation and promotes the upgrading of industrial structure for the establishment of modern industrial system and the realization of high-quality development.
This paper firstly analyzed the mechanism of digital finance, technological innovation and its intermediary effect on the upgrading of industrial structure from the aspects of capital formation, risk dispersion and consumption guidance, and research hypotheses were proposed. Then, based on the mediating effect method, fixed-effect model was constructed, and the impact of digital finance and technological innovation on the upgrading of industrial structure and its regional heterogeneity were empirically tested on the basis of measuring the upgrading of industrial structure, technological innovation and other indices, combined with Chinese urban panel data. The empirical results showed that digital finance and technological innovation both promote the upgrading of industrial structure. The results of the sub-dimensional heterogeneity test showed that the breadth of coverage, depth of use, and degree of digitialization of digital finance all promoted the upgrading of the industrial structure. The results of the regional heterogeneity test showed that the promotion effect of digital finance in the central and western regions is greater than that in the eastern region, indicating that digital finance can help narrow regional gaps and promote coordinated regional development. The results of the mediating effect test confirmed that digital finance promotes the upgrading of industrial structure by stimulating technological innovation in China and the central and western regions. Based on the above conclusions, in order to accelerate technological innovation, promote the upgrading of industrial structure and coordinate regional development, this paper put forward some policy recommendations from the following aspects:
(1) The development of digital finance should be promoted. Firstly, the government should lead the formation of a frontier digital technology research group to break down the technical barriers between regions, enterprises and scientific research institutes to accelerate the development process of digital technology. Secondly, a regional digital financial development policy should be implemented. The eastern region should make full use of good technical conditions, strong capital base and economic policy advantages to achieve major digital technology breakthroughs as soon as possible while the central and western regions should start with the construction of new infrastructure such as 5G, and make full use of late-mover advantages to achieve the leap-forward development. Thirdly, digital financial education should be strengthened. The small-, medium- and micro-enterprises or other groups in the central and western regions need to be guided to use digital financial resources correctly and expand the coverage of digital financial services.
(2) The digital transformation of traditional finance should also be enhanced. Firstly, the integrated development of traditional finance with digital technology should be promoted; the limitations of banks and other traditional finance be overcome in terms of business network and operation time; and more inclusive development of traditional finance be promoted. Secondly, focus should be given on the theme of "scientific and technological innovation", and on such traditional financial institutions as the four major state-owned commercial banks of "ICBC, ABC, BOC, CCB" so as to promote the digital technology innovation process. Thirdly, the reform of the financial system should be further deepened to make the market play a decisive role in resource allocation, and financial support and preferential policies for small, medium and micro high-tech enterprises should be appropriately strengthened by financial institutions.
(3) The technological innovation process should be accelerated. Firstly, regional innovation incentive policies should be implemented to meet the demands of different regional industrial development and market consumption. Secondly, various types of policies such as financial policy, industrial policy, fiscal subsidy policy and environmental regulation measures should be comprehensively adopted to guide the allocation of economic and social resources to enterprises in high-tech industries. Thirdly, a cooperation model between the government and private capital for technological innovation should be established to alleviate the problem of lack of funds faced by China′s technological innovation.
Key words
industrial structure upgrading /
digital finance /
technological innovation /
mediating effect /
regional heterogeneity
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
1.曹凤岐.建立多层次农村普惠金融体系[J].农村金融研究,2010(10):64-67.
2.陈明,魏作磊.中国服务业开放对产业结构升级的影响[J].经济学家,2016(4):24-32.
3.杜金岷,韦施威,吴文洋.数字普惠金融促进了产业结构优化吗?[J].经济社会体制比较,2020(6):38-49.
4.段鑫,李明蕊.数字普惠金融对产业结构升级的影响分析[J].青海金融,2020(12):47-52.
5.郭峰,王靖一,王芳等.测度中国数字普惠金融发展[J].经济学(季刊),2020,19(4):1401-1418.
6.郭晔,黄振,姚若琪.战略投资者选择与银行效率[J].经济研究,2020(1):181-197.
7.梁榜,张建华.数字普惠金融发展能激励创新吗?[J].当代经济科学,2019(9):74-86.
8.潘爽,叶德珠,叶显.数字金融普惠了吗——来自城市创新的经验证据[J].经济学家,2021(3):101-111.
9.苏任刚,赵湘莲,胡香香.普惠金融能成为促进中国产业结构优化升级的新动能吗?[J]技术经济,2020,39(4):39-52.
10.陶爱萍,徐君超.金融发展与产业结构升级非线性关系研究[J].经济经纬, 2016(2):90-95.
11.唐文进,李爽,陶云清.数字普惠金融发展与产业结构升级[J].广东财经大学学报,2019,34(6):35-49.
12.涂强楠,何宜庆.数字普惠金融、科技创新与制造业产业结构升级[J].统计与决策,2021,37(5):95-99.
13.王定祥,吴代红,王小华.中国金融发展与产业结构优化的实证研究[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2013(5):1-6.
14.汪伟,刘玉飞,彭冬冬.人口老龄化的产业结构升级效应研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(11):47-61.
15.温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法与模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014(5):731-745.
16.谢家智,王文涛,李尚真.包容性金融发展的产业结构升级效应[J].当代经济研究,2017(3):74-83.
17.谢平,邹传伟:互联网金融模式研究[J].金融研究,2012(12):11-22.
18.易行健,周利.数字普惠金融发展是否显著影响了居民消费[J].金融研究, 2018(11):51-71.
19.尹应凯,侯蕤.数字普惠金融的发展逻辑、国际经验与中国贡献[J].学术探索,2017(3):104-111.
20.张林,冉光和.金融包容性发展的产业结构优化效应及区域异质性[J].经济与管理研究, 2018(9):41-52.
21.张晓燕.我国普惠金融发展与产业结构升级[J].农村金融研究,2016(5):19-25.
22.张勋,万广华,张佳佳等.数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长[J].经济研究,2019(8):71-86.
23.郑雅心.数字普惠金融是否可以提高区域创新产出? [J].经济问题,2020(10):53-61.
24.Aghion P., Fally T., Scarpetta S. Credit Constraints as A Barrier to the Entry and Post-entry Growth of Firms[J]. Economic Policy,2007,22(52):731-779.
25.Arizala F, Cavallo E, Galindo A . Financial Development and TFP Growth: Cross-Country and Industry-Level Evidence[J]. Applied Financial Economics,2013,23(6):433-448.
26.Baron RM,Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,51:1173-1182.
27.Booth G G , Junttila J , Kallunki J P , et al. How does the financial environment affect the stock market valuation of R&D spending?[J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2006, 15(2):197-214.
28.Bruhn M , Love I . The Real Impact of Improved Access to Finance: Evidence from Mexico[J]. Journal of Finance, 2014, 69(3):1347-1376.
29.Claessens S, Tzioumis K. Measuring Firms’ Access to Finance[R]. World Bank, 2006.
30.Hallberg K.A market-oriented strategy for small and medium scale enterprises[R]. discussion paper,No.40, world bank,2000.
31.Hicks John. A Theory of Economic History[M]. New York: Oxford University Press. 1969.
32.Jiang M.R., Luo S.M., Zhou G.Y. Financial development, OFDI spillovers and upgrading of industrial structure[J]. Technological forecasting & social change,2020,155:1-10.