The internationalization path of hydroelectric engineering technical standards based on the innovation ecosystem: A case study of BSI

Tang Zhen, Zhang Lu, Zhang Yang

Science Research Management ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12) : 1-13.

Science Research Management ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12) : 1-13.

The internationalization path of hydroelectric engineering technical standards based on the innovation ecosystem: A case study of BSI

  • Tang Zhen1,2,3, Zhang Lu1,2,3, Zhang Yang1,2,3
Author information +
History +

Abstract

   The dominance of technical standards has a profound impact on the pattern and institutional arrangement of global governance. Sino-hydro internationalization is one of the most important informal mechanisms to practicing Chinese concept of global governance. China′s hydroelectric project takes the leading position in the world both in technology and market but is still subject to European and American engineering technical standards, which influence Chinese major role in global governance system. Current situation urgently requests to explore the feasible mode and effective path of Chinese hydroelectric engineering technical standards internationalization. Meanwhile, international mainstream engineering technical standards have undergone a successful transformation from domestic norms to international standards. Among them, British Standards Institution plays a pivotal role in the process of internationalization of British hydroelectric engineering technical standards. Due to this fact, based on the theory of innovation ecosystem, role theory and technical standard diffusion theory, this study tends to investigate the evolution of British standards by identifying the roles and strategic actions of system members, analyzing the competitive advantage of the system. Based on the longitudinal development history of British Standards Institution, this exploratory single-case study would make an in-depth description and theoretical explanation of British Standards Institution, untangle the mode of hydroelectric engineering technical standard internationalization.It comes to the following findings: first, with the change in dynamic environment, different organizations play diverse roles and then perform strategic actions in three stages. The essence of role transformation is that members of innovation system cope with environment change, system evolution and members′ behaviors, following with the change of strategic actions, generating characteristic modes. Second, three characteristic modes include technology standardization, technical standards internationalization and technical standard business internationalization, forming three advantages involving standard leading, network effect and positive feedback of standard. Third, on account of comparison between China and Britain, this study puts forward suggestions from three levels containing collaborative innovation-led technology standardization, technical standards internationalization based on industrial alliances and ecosystem competition centered on hydroelectric engineering technical standards. To be specific, British hydroelectric engineering technical standard embedded in the innovation ecosystem establish high switching cost, resulting in technical standards competition turning to competition in technical standards innovation ecosystem. The possibility of new technical standards replacing current standards depends on innovation ecosystem whether can provide the same or more full-featured environmental conditions and service functions. Hence, the new innovation ecosystem should not only integrate the current ecosystem but also achieve better performance on this basis.This paper makes main contributions as follows: first, it tends to bridge the gap in the role theory with the attempt to observe the dynamic evolution of organizational roles; second, it constructs a technical standard innovation ecosystem based on national and international competitive advantage at macro-level, analyzes members′ relationship at meso-level, discusses how a core member drive the evolution of system members at micro-level. Further, the view of supporting role of government and association in innovation ecosystem proposed in this paper can enrich the existing research about ecosystem; third, it deepens the comprehension of reason that European and American enterprises have been rarely involved in hydropower construction but their technical standards can still occupy a dominant position in the world, emphasize that technical standards is a key competitive advantage for hydroelectric engineering enterprises and even the country.

Key words

British Standards Institution (BSI) / hydroelectric engineering technical standards / innovation ecosystem / internationalization path

Cite this article

Download Citations
Tang Zhen, Zhang Lu, Zhang Yang. The internationalization path of hydroelectric engineering technical standards based on the innovation ecosystem: A case study of BSI[J]. Science Research Management. 2022, 43(12): 1-13

References

[1]International Standards[EB/OL].https://www.iec.ch/standardsdev/publications/is.htm.2019-11-13. [2]辜胜阻, 曹冬梅, 杨嵋.构建粤港澳大湾区创新生态系统的战略思考[J].中国软科学, 2018, (04):1-9 [3]曾赛星, 陈宏权, 金治州, 苏权科.重大工程创新生态系统演化及创新力提升[J].管理世界, 2019, 35(04):28-38 [4]陈衍泰, 孟媛媛, 张露嘉, 范海霞.产业创新生态系统的价值创造和获取机制分析——基于中国电动汽车的跨案例分析[J].科研管理, 2015, 36(S1):68-75 [5]梅亮, 陈劲, 刘洋.创新生态系统:源起、知识演进和理论框架[J].科学学研究, 2014, 32(12):1771-1780 [6]Estrin J.Closing the Innovation Gap: Reigniting the spark of creativity in a global economy[J].Business Horizons, 2008, 52(5):513-514 [7]Ritala P, Agouridas V, Assimakopoulos D, et al.Value creation and capture mecha-nisms in innovation ecosystems: A comparative case study[J].International Journal of Technology Management, 2013, 63(34):244-267 [8]Adner R.Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem[J].Harvard Business Review, 2006, 84(4):98-107 [9]Moore J F.Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition[J].Harvard Business Review, 1993, 71(3):75-83 [10]梁运文, 谭力文.商业生态系统价值结构、企业角色与战略选择[J].南开管理评论, 2005, (01):57-63 [11]王宏起, 杨仲基, 武建龙, 李玥.战略性新兴产业核心能力形成机理研究[J].科研管理, 2018, 39(02):143-151 [12]Jung K, Andrew S.Building R&D collaboration between university-research institutes and small medium-sized enterprises[J].International Journal of Social Economics, 2014, 41(12):1174-1193 [13]郭雯, 陶凯, 李振国.政策组合对领先市场形成的影响分析——以新能源汽车产业为例[J].科研管理, 2018, 39(12):30-36 [14]Dougherty D and Danielle D D.Organizing ecologies of complex innovation[J].Organization Science, 2011, 22(5):1212-1223 [15]Sun Y, Liu F.A regional perspective on the structural transformation of China’s national innovation system since 1999[J].Technological Forecasting& Social Change, 2010, 77(8):1311-1321 [16]Malerba, Franco.Sectoral systems Of innovation And production[J].Research Policy, 2002, 31(2):247-264 [17]Adner R, Kapoor R.Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(4):625-648 [18]Alexy O, George G, Salter A I.Cui Bono? The selective revealing of knowledge and its implications for innovative activity[J].Academy of Management Review, 2013, 38(2):270-291 [19]Iansiti M, Levien R.The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability[M]. Brighton: Harvard Business Press, 2004. [20]张越, 余江.新一代信息技术产业发展模式转变的演进机理——以中国蜂窝移动通信产业为例[J].科学学研究, 2016, 34(12):1807-1816 [21]Newman M E J.The structure and function of complex networks[J].SIAM Review, 2003, 45(2):167-256 [22]何文韬.新能源汽车产业的政策保护与利基构建——基于多层次产业演化的分析[J].科研管理, 2019, 40(09):139-148 [23]戴亦舒, 叶丽莎, 董小英.创新生态系统的价值共创机制——基于腾讯众创空间的案例研究[J].研究与发展管理, 2018, 30(04):24-36 [24]丁玲, 吴金希.核心企业与商业生态系统的案例研究:互利共生与捕食共生战略[J].管理评论, 2017, 29(07):244-257 [25]杨蕙馨, 王硕, 冯文娜.网络效应视角下技术标准的竞争性扩散——来自IOS与Android之争的实证研究[J].中国工业经济, 2014, (09):135-147 [26]李薇.技术标准联盟的本质:基于对&; 联盟和专利联盟的辨析[J].科研管理, 2014, 35(10):49-56 [27]龚丽敏, 江诗松.平台型商业生态系统战略管理研究前沿:视角和对象[J].外国经济与管理, 2016, 38(06):38-50 [28]Katz M L, Shapiro C.Network Externalities,competition,and compatibility[J].American Economic Review, 1985, 75(3):424-440 [29]Schilke O.On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35(2):179-203 [30]帅旭, 陈宏民.市场竞争中的网络外部性效应:理论与实践[J].软科学, 2003, 17(6):65-69 [31]赵树宽, 鞠晓伟, 陆晓芳.中国技术标准化对产业竞争优势的影响机理研究[J].中国软科学, 2004, (01):17-21+82 [32]Eisenhardt K M.Building theories from case study research[J].The Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(04):532-550 [33]Yin R K.Case study research: design and methods[J].Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2010, 44(01):108-108 [34]Penrose E.The Theory of the growth of the firm[M]. New York: Free Press, 1959. [35]杜军, 韩子惠, 焦媛媛.互联网金融服务的盈利模式演化及实现路径研究——以京东供应链金融为例[J].管理评论, 2019, 31(08):277-294 [36]郑胜华, 池仁勇.核心企业合作能力、创新网络与产业协同演化机理研究[J].科研管理, 2017, 38(06):28-42

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/