Science Research Management ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 45-54.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Peng Huatao1,2, Pan Yueyi1, Chen Yun1
Received:
2022-03-21
Revised:
2022-07-11
Online:
2022-11-20
Published:
2022-11-18
Peng Huatao, Pan Yueyi, Chen Yun. Research on the relationship among social network embedding, ambidextrous equilibrium innovation and international entrepreneurship[J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(11): 45-54.
[1] Mainela T, Puhakka V, Sipola S. International entrepreneurship beyond individuals and firms: On the systemic nature of international opportunities[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2018, 33(4): 534-550.[2] Martin S L, Javalgi R G. Epistemological foundations of international entrepreneurship[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2018, 14(3): 671-680.[3] O'cass A, Weerawardena J. Examining the role of international entrepreneurship, innovation and international market performance in SME internationalisation[J]. European Journal of Marketing, 2009, 43(11-12): 1325-1348.[4] Luo Y, Rui H. An Ambidexterity Perspective Toward Multinational Enterprises From Emerging Economies[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2009, 23(4): 49-70.[5] Prange C, Verdier S. Dynamic capabilities, internationalization processes and performance[J]. Journal of World Business, 2011, 46(1): 126-133.[6] Martin S L, Javalgi R G, Cavusgil E. Marketing capabilities, positional advantage, and performance of born global firms: Contingent effect of ambidextrous innovation[J]. International Business Review, 2017, 26(3): 527-543.[7] Knight G A, Cavusgil S T. Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2004, 35(2): 124-141.[8] Fernhaber S A, Mcdougall-Covin P P. Is more always better? Risk trade-offs among internationalizing new ventures[J]. European Business Review, 2014, 26(5):406-420.[9] O’reilly Iii C A, Tushman M L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma[J]. Research in organizational behavior, 2008, 28: 185-206.[10] Atuahene-Gima K, Murray J Y. Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2007, 15(2): 1-29.[11] March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87.[12] Gupta A K, Smith K G, Shalley C E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4): 693-706.[13] Hsu C-W, Lien Y-C, Chen H. International ambidexterity and firm performance in small emerging economies[J]. Journal of World Business, 2013, 48(1): 58-67.[14] Yaqub M Z, Sreckovic M, Cliquet G, et al. Network innovation versus innovation through networks[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2020, 90: 79-89.[15] Sepulveda F, Gabrielsson M. Network development and firm growth: A resource-based study of B2B Born Globals[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2013, 42(5): 792-804.[16] Heavey C, Simsek Z, Fox B C. Managerial Social Networks and Ambidexterity of SMEs: The Moderating Role of a Proactive Commitment to Innovation[J]. Human Resource Management, 2015, 54: S201-S221.[17] 陈运森. 社会网络与企业效率:基于结构洞位置的证据[J]. 会计研究, 2015(1): 48-55+97.[18] 张敏, 童丽静, 许浩然. 社会网络与企业风险承担——基于我国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2015(11): 161-175.[19] Yildiz H E, Morgulis-Yakushev S, Holm U, et al. Directionality matters: Board interlocks and firm internationalization[J]. Global Strategy Journal, 2021: 1-21.[20] Pugliese A, Bezemer P-J, Zattoni A, et al. Boards of Directors' Contribution to Strategy: A Literature Review and Research Agenda[J]. Corporate Governance-an International Review, 2009, 17(3): 292-306.[21] Jansen J J P, George G, Van Den Bosch F a J, et al. Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45(5): 982-1007.[22] Contractor N S, Wasserman S, Faust K. Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(3): 681-703.[23] Lindstrand A, Handll S M. International and market-specific social capital effects on international opportunity exploitation in the internationalization process[J]. Journal of World Business, 2017, 52(5): 653-663.[24] Jansen J J P, Van Den Bosch F a J, Volberda H W. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(11): 1661-1674.[25] Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of management review, 2003, 28(2): 238-256.[26] Ferreras-Méndez J L, Llopis O, Alegre J. Speeding up new product development through entrepreneurial orientation in SMEs: The moderating role of ambidexterity[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2022, 102: 240-251.[27] Assink M. Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model[J]. European journal of innovation management, 2006, 9(2):215–233.[28] Walrave B, Van Oorschot K E, Romme A G L. Getting Trapped in the Suppression of Exploration: A Simulation Model[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48(8): 1727-1751.[29] O'reilly Iii C A, Tushman M L. Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future[J]. Academy of management Perspectives, 2013, 27(4): 324-338.[30] Li R, Peng C, Koo B, et al. Obtaining sustainable competitive advantage through collaborative dual innovation: empirical analysis based on mature enterprises in eastern China[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2021, 33(6): 685-699.[31] Yu S-H, Chen H-C. External knowledge, intraorganisational networks and exploratory innovation: an empirical examination[J]. Innovation-Organization & Management, 2020, 22(3): 250-269.[32] Cao Q, Gedajlovic E, Zhang H. Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(4): 781-796.[33] Beckman C M. The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4): 741-758.[34] Katila R, Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction[J]. Academy of management journal, 2002, 45(6): 1183-1194.[35] Zang J, Li Y. Technology capabilities, marketing capabilities and innovation ambidexterity[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2017, 29(1): 23-37.[36] Zhou L, Wu W-P, Luo X. Internationalization and the performance of born-global SMEs: the mediating role of social networks[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007, 38(4): 673-690.[37] Siu W-S, Bao Q. Network strategies of small Chinese high-technology firms: A qualitative study[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2008, 25(1): 79-102.[38] Burt R S. Structural holes[M]. Harvard university press, 1992.[39] Singh D, Delios A. Corporate governance, board networks and growth in domestic and international markets: Evidence from India[J]. Journal of World Business, 2017, 52(5): 615-627.[40] Nandy M, Lodh S, Kaur J, et al. Impact of directors' networks on corporate social responsibility: A cross country study[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2020, 72: 101601.[41] Zhao J. Knowledge management capability and technology uncertainty: driving factors of dual innovation[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2021, 33(7): 783-796.[42] Dong J Q, Yang C-H. Being central is a double-edged sword: Knowledge network centrality and new product development in US pharmaceutical industry[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2016, 113: 379-385.[43] Salman N, Saives A L. Indirect networks: an intangible resource for biotechnology innovation[J]. R & D Management, 2005, 35(2): 203-215.[44] Larcker D F, So E C, Wang C C Y. Boardroom centrality and firm performance[J]. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 2013, 55(2-3): 225-250.[45] Harms R, Schiele H. Antecedents and consequences of effectuation and causation in the international new venture creation process[J]. Journal of international entrepreneurship, 2012, 10(2): 95-116.[46] Omer T C, Shelley M K, Tice F M. Do well-connected directors affect firm value?[J]. Journal of Applied Finance (Formerly Financial Practice and Education), 2014, 24(2): 17-32.[47] Abdul Wahab E A, Jamaludin M F, Agustia D, et al. Director Networks, Political Connections, and Earnings Quality in Malaysia[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2020, 16(3): 687-724.[48] Alguezaui S, Filieri R. Investigating the role of social capital in innovation: sparse versus dense network[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2010, 14(6): 891-909.[49] Chetty S, Agndal H. Social capital and its influence on changes in internationalization mode among small and medium-sized enterprises[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2007, 15(1): 1-29.[50] Masiello B, Izzo F. Interpersonal Social Networks and Internationalization of Traditional SMEs[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2019, 57: 658-691.[51] Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2005, 50(1): 100-130.[52] Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology[J]. Organization science, 1992, 3(3): 383-397.[53] Hashai N, Almor T. Gradually internationalizing ‘born global’firms: an oxymoron?[J]. International business review, 2004, 13(4): 465-483.[54] He Z L, Wong P K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(4): 481-494.[55] Gao Y, Hu Y, Liu X, et al. Can public R&D subsidy facilitate firms’ exploratory innovation? The heterogeneous effects between central and local subsidy programs[J]. Research Policy, 2021, 50(4): 104221.[56] Podolny J M, Stuart T E. A role-based ecology of technological change[J]. American journal of sociology, 1995, 100(5): 1224-1260.[57] 戴静, 杨筝, 刘贯春, et al. 银行业竞争、创新资源配置和企业创新产出——基于中国工业企业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020(2): 51-70.[58] Desai V M. The behavioral theory of the (governed) firm: Corporate board influences on organizations’ responses to performance shortfalls[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(3): 860-879.[59] Lu L-H, Wong P-K. Performance feedback, financial slack and the innovation behavior of firms[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2019, 36(4): 1079-1109.[60] Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications[J], 1994.[61] Gonzalez-Brambila C N, Veloso F M, Krackhardt D. The impact of network embeddedness on research output[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(9): 1555-1567.[62] Naldi L, Achtenhagen L, Davidsson P. International Corporate Entrepreneurship among SMEs: A Test of Stevenson's Notion of Entrepreneurial Management[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2015, 53(3): 780-800.[63] Xie Q. CEO tenure and ownership mode choice of Chinese firms: The moderating roles of managerial discretion[J]. International Business Review, 2014, 23(5): 910-919.[64] 李春涛, 闫续文, 宋敏, et al. 金融科技与企业创新——新三板上市公司的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(1): 81-98.[65] Zhang Z, Luo T. Knowledge structure, network structure, exploitative and exploratory innovations[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2020, 32(6): 666-682.[66] Junni P, Sarala R M, Taras V, et al. Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2013, 27(4): 299-312.[67] 焦豪. 双元型组织竞争优势的构建路径:基于动态能力理论的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2011(11): 76-91+188.[68] Vrontis D, Thrassou A, Santoro G, et al. Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2017, 42(2): 374-388.[69] Liu J, Zhu Y. Promoting tacit knowledge application and integration through guanxi and structural holes[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2021, 25(5): 1027-1058.[70] Xie X, Fang L, Zeng S, et al. How does knowledge inertia affect firms product innovation?[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(5): 1615-1620. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||