The agglomeration of marine science and technology talents is an important means to realize the strategy of building a strong maritime country. By means of measuring the agglomeration degree of marine science and technology talents in different areas and analyzing the influencing factors, we can guide the reasonable flow and agglomeration of marine science and technology talents, which is very important for improving the social and economic problems caused by unreasonable agglomeration of marine science and technology talents. What is the current situation of marine science and technology talents agglomeration in China? What are the influencing factors of marine science and technology talents agglomeration? This paper aims to solve these two problems.
Taking the data of the 11 coastal provinces and cities in China from 2006 to 2015 as a sample, we used the talent location entropy method to measure the agglomeration degree of marine science and technology talents in coastal areas from 2006 to 2015, and made a comparative analysis of the differences on different cities. Overall, the agglomeration of marine science and technology talents in coastal areas presents an unbalanced state. Economically developed cities are at a higher level of marine talents agglomeration. We can draw a conclusion roughly according to the change of the talent location entropy index of each province and city. In the past ten years, the main export places of talents are Shanghai and Tianjin, which are relatively developed. The main input places of talents are provinces which are concentrated in the northern and central coastal regions, while the overall change of the southern coastal areas is not obvious.
Based on the perspective of talent ecological environment, and combined with the characteristics of marine science and technology talents, we used ordinary panel regression and spatial quantile regression methods to explore the overall impact of economic, industrial, life, culture and opening-up on the agglomeration of marine science and technology talents. The results show that the effect and significance of different factors on different marine science and technology talents agglomeration are different: (1) Natural environment pollution has an obvious inhibitory effect on the agglomeration of marine science and technology talents. The regional GDP, marine output value, marine education level, marine science and technology level, cultural atmosphere and public service level have an obvious promoting effect on the agglomeration degree of marine science and technology talents. While the degree of opening to the outside world has a not significant effect on the agglomeration of marine talents. (2) Marine education level and public service level are the common influencing factors of marine science and technology talents agglomeration. They have positive influence on all provinces and cities with different agglomeration degree of marine science and technology talents, and their effect is stronger in provinces and cities with higher agglomeration degree of marine science and technology talents than provinces and cities with lower agglomeration degree of marine science and technology talents. The regional GDP is the main influencing factor of the provinces with low agglomeration of marine science and technology talents, and the higher the regional GDP is, the higher the agglomeration of marine science and technology talents is. Marine output value is the main influencing factor of the provinces and cities where the agglomeration degree of marine science and technology talents is in the middle position, the higher the regional marine output value is, the higher the agglomeration degree of marine science and technology talents is. The level of marine science and technology has a positive impact on the provinces and cities with low and medium agglomeration of marine science and technology talents. To some extent, the improvement of cultural atmosphere has a more obvious influence on the provinces and cities where the agglomeration degree of marine science and technology talents is in medium and high level, but the effect on the provinces and cities with low agglomeration degree of marine science and technology talents is not obvious.
The above conclusions expand the relevant research on the agglomeration of marine science and technology talents, and they may act as the supplement and improvement for the existing theories of marine science and technology talents agglomeration. In addition, they have some enlightenment to the management of marine science and technology talents agglomeration in China. On the basis of the effect and significance of the influence of various factors, we can guide the reasonable flow and agglomeration of marine science and technology talents according to different circumstances and maximize the effect of talents agglomeration, so as to improve the social and economic problems caused by the unreasonable agglomeration of marine science and technology talents.
Finally, combined with the actual situation of the agglomeration of marine science and technology talents in China, we put forward some policy suggestions for optimizing the agglomeration of marine talents: (1) Provinces and cities with low agglomeration: develop economy further and lay a good economic foundation. The main work of provinces and cities with low agglomeration of marine science and technology talents is to focus on the development of local economy and economic construction, and improve the speed and quality of economic development. (2) Provinces and cities with middle agglomeration: vigorously develop the marine industry and improve the level of marine science and technology. The main work of provinces and cities with middle agglomeration of the marine science and technology talents is to focus on the development of marine industry and marine science and technology, and create the attraction of marine talents relying on the development of marine industry and marine science and technology. (3) Provinces and cities with high degree of agglomeration: create a good cultural atmosphere and rely on cultural soft power to enhance talent cultivation. Provinces and cities with high agglomeration of marine science and technology talents, such as Shanghai and Tianjin, should focus on creating a good urban cultural environment.
Key words
marine science and technology talent /
agglomeration of talent /
influencing factor /
agglomeration degree measurement
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 王勇. 人才集聚研究综述[J]. 生产力研究,2011(9):205~208.
[2] Simon C. Human capital and metropolitan employment growth. Urban Econ[J], 1998, 43(2): 223~243.
[3] 蔡永莲. 实施优秀人才集聚战略[J]. 教育发展研究,1999(1):32~36.
[4] 孙健,孙启文,孙嘉琦. 中国不同地区人才集聚模式研究[J]. 人口与经济,2007(3):13~18.
[5] 牛冲槐,杨玲,芮雪琴. 区域人才聚集下的创新优势分析[J]. 山西高等学校社会科学学报,2010,22(1):39~41+47.
[6] 宋美丽,孙健. 国外人才集聚模式的经验及对我国的启示[J]. 经济纵横,2010(2):119~122.
[7] 李乃文,李方正. 基于人才集聚载体的人才吸引力研究——以辽西北地区为例[J]. 人口与经济,2011(6):41~48.
[8] 曹威麟,王艺洁,刘志迎. 人才环境与人才成长预期对集聚意愿的影响研究[J]. 中国人力资源开发,2016(19):64~70.
[9] Paul Krugman. Development,geography and economic theory[J]. The MIT press, Cambridge, 1995: 45~80.
[10] 张益丰,孙文浩. 高技术产业与科技研发人才:集聚形态、影响机制及演化路径[J]. 中国人力资源开发,2018,35(3):104~116.
[11] 洪进,余文涛,杨凤丽. 人力资本、创意阶层及其区域空间分布研究[J]. 经济学家,2011,(9):28~35.
[12] 孙美佳,胡伟. 政府行政效能对高层次人才集聚的影响研究[J]. 江苏行政学院学报,2016(5):117~122.
[13] 侯静茹,杨倚奇. 人才环境对科技创新人才集聚的作用分析—江苏区域人才环境的实证分析[J]. 企业改革与管理,2016(7):44~46.
[14] 王全纲,赵永乐. 全球高端人才流动和集聚的影响因素研究[J]. 科学管理研究,2017,35(1):91~94.
[15] 裴玲玲. 科技人才集聚与高技术产业发展的互动关系[J]. 科学学研究,2018,36(5):813~824.
[16] Taylor L R, Taylor R A. Aggregation, migration and population mechanics. Nature, 1977, 265(5593):415.
[17] 李光红,孙丽丽,李文喜. 演化博弈视角下人才集聚关键影响因素及发展路径研究[J]. 东岳论丛,2013, 34(11):141~144.
[18] 于洋. 基于个体行为模型的人才集聚因素分析[J]. 商业时代,2013(2):87~88.
[19] 廖建桥,黄书毅,刘智强. 中国区域人才集聚合理性及其评价——中美500强企业地区分布的对比视角[J]. 经济管理,2007(19):76~81.
[20] 李瑞,吴殿廷,鲍捷,邱研,王维. 高级科学人才集聚成长的时空格局演化及其驱动机制——基于中国科学院院士的典型分析[J]. 地理科学进展,2013,32(7):1123~1138.
[21] 杨岩,姚长青,张均胜,张兆锋. 长江中游城市群科研人才空间集聚分析[J]. 地理空间信息,2018,16(9):5~10.
[22] 张樨樨,朱庆林,谭骏. 海洋科技人才集聚力综合评价研究[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011(6):65~71.
[23] 曹威麟,姚静静,余玲玲,刘志迎. 我国人才集聚与三次产业集聚关系研究[J]. 科研管理,2015,36(12):172~179.
[24] 桂昭明. 城市人才集聚度评价与比较研究[J]. 人事天地,2015(4):13~18.
[25] Abdih Y, Joutz F. Relating the knowledge production function to total factor productivity: an endogenous growth puzzle[J]. Imf Staff Papers, 2006, 53(2):242~271.
[26] 季小立,浦玉忠. 产业创新背景下区域人才集聚效应及管理跟进——以江苏为例[J]. 现代经济探讨,2017(4):72~76.
[27] 唐朝永,牛冲槐. 协同创新网络、人才集聚效应与创新绩效关系研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2017,34(3):134~139.
[28] 刘兵,曾建丽,梁林等. 京津冀经济发展的动力源泉:科技人才集聚的关键影响[J]. 科技管理研究,2018(3):120~126.
[29] Azari M, Kim H, Kim J Y, et al. The effect of agglomeration on the productivity of urban manufacturing sectors in a leading emerging economy[J]. Economic Systems, 2016, 40(3): 422-432.
[30] 胡蓓,朱朴义. 产业集群人才集聚拥挤研究[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(19):130~134.