In recent years, with the increase of R&D investment, the innovation ability of Chinese enterprises has been significantly improved. However, compared with developed countries, China still has a significant gap in R&D investment.
Real estate market in China maintains relatively strong growth over the last 20 years. The marketization of China′s housing market and land market has attracted more and more investment from non-real-estate enterprises. Like R&D investment, real estate investment requires large amount of time, money and expertise. Therefore, investment in R&D and real estate may be mutually exclusive, competing for limited resources.
Many studies have found that real estate has become an important and attractive investment opportunity for non-real-estate enterprises in China. However, existing literatures that research the correlation between real estate investment, R&D investment and operating efficiency are limited. In addition, macro data is used in most of existing studies, which restrict deep understanding of enterprise behavior.
The paper focuses on enterprise innovation behavior, exploring the relationship between real estate investment and enterprise innovation and R&D investment. The empirical analysis is based on micro panel data of listed industrial enterprises in China from 2000 to 2016, including 2249 enterprises. The regression results show that the housing price growth rate has a significant impact on real estate investment decisions of non-real estate enterprises, among which the real estate development and sale business is more affected. The result is robust after selective bias is alleviated by Heckman method. Furthermore, empirical analysis separates the two approaches of investing in real estate with the help of propensity score matching method and grouped regression. Result shows that both investing approaches have significantly reduced the intensity of R&D input. However, operating efficiency is not influenced in this case. Lastly, it is demonstrated that the above crowding-out effect exists for a long time, even when real estate has become one of the most dominant business for non-real-estate enterprises.
Conclusions of the paper provide a theoretical foundation for government to take targeted measures to encourage innovative R&D investment and regulate real estate market. In order to achieve the goal of Made-in China 2025, the government should guide enterprises to invest reasonably in research and development. For strategic emerging industries, the government should adopt incentive policies such as widening financing channels and reducing financing costs to enhance the motivation of enterprises to carry out research and development projects. On the basis of abiding by laws, standards and regulations, enterprises can normally carry out real estate investment activities, which should be recognized by the public. However, the government should review the qualifications of these companies in transition. If they lack a competitive advantage in the real estate industry and only pursue short-term profits while ignoring long-term value, they should stop. Only through this process can we make more effective use of social resources and coordinate the real estate market with other industries.
Key words
real estate market /
real estate investment /
R&D investment
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1]王文春, 荣昭.房价上涨对工业企业创新的抑制影响研究[J].经济学:季刊, 2014, 13(2):465-490
[2]Shi Y.Real Estate Booms and Endogenous Productivity Growth[J]. 2017.
[3]孙晓华, 王昀.投资与企业生产率——基于中国工业企业微观数据的分析[J].科研管理, 2014, 35(11):92-99
[4]孙早, 宋炜.企业R&D投入对产业创新绩效的影响——来自中国制造业的经验证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2012, 29(4):49-63.[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2012, 29(4):49-63
[5]谢兰云.中国省域R&D投入对经济增长作用途径的空间计量分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2013, 9:37-47.
[6]严成樑, 龚六堂.R&D规模、R&D结构与经济增长[J]. 南开经济研究, 2013(2):3-19.
[7]Corradin S, Popov A.House Prices,Home Equity Borrowing,and Entrepreneurship[J].Review of Financial Studies, 2015, 28(8):2399-2428
[8]Chaney T, Sraer D, Thesmar D.The Collateral Channel: How Real Estate Shocks Affect Corporate Investment[J].American Economic Review, 2012, 102(6):2381-2409
[9]Gan J.Collateral,debt capacity,and corporate investment: Evidence from a natural experiment[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2007, 85(3):709-734
[10]Shi J, Wang Y, Wu W, et al.The Crowding-Out Effect of Real Estate Markets on Corporate Innovation: Evidence from China[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2016.
[11]林嵩.房地产行业对于创业活动的挤出效应——基于中国跨地区面板数据的分析[J]. 经济管理, 2012(6):21-29.
[12]余静文, 王媛, 谭静.房价高增长与企业“低技术锁定”--基于中国工业企业数据库的微观证据[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2015(5):44-56.
[13]邓伟, 纪明明.房地产行业的发展会影响企业家精神吗——来自我国地级城市面板数据的研究[J]. 现代财经-天津财经大学学报, 2017(1):3-13.
[14]陈海声, 温嘉怡.我国制造企业&投资与房地产投资的实证研究[J].科技管理研究, 2012, 32(5):124-127
[15]邓博文.工业企业房地产投资对企业创新的影响——基于中国上市公司数据的实证研究[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2014(10):113-120.
[16]高玲玲.中国房价上涨是否引发工业衰退[J]. 现代财经-天津财经大学学报, 2015(9):15-23.
[17]高小奕.高房价是否令工业企业土地投资流向房地产?[D]. 厦门大学, 2014.
[18]李畅, 谢家智, 吴超.房地产投资与制造业:促进效应还是挤出效应——基于非参数逐点回归的实证分析[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2013(5):39-48.
[19]鲁凌志.工业企业投资房地产对企业生产效率的影响——以我国上市公司为例[D]. 西南财经大学, 2016.
[20]陈斌开, 金箫, 欧阳涤非.住房价格、资源错配与中国工业企业生产率[J]. 世界经济, 2015(4):77-98.
[21]罗知, 张川川.信贷扩张、房地产投资与制造业部门的资源配置效率[J]. 金融研究, 2015(7):60-75.
[22]Sekine T, Tachibana T.Land as Production Input and Collateral: Land Investment by Japanese Firms[J].Journal of Real Estate Finance & Economics, 2007, 35(4):497-526
[23]曾海舰.房产价值与公司投融资变动——抵押担保渠道效应的中国经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2012(5):125-136.
[24]Cvijanovi? D.Real estate prices and firm capital structure[J].The Review of Financial Studies, 2014, 27(9):2690-2735
[25]何凯云.融资约束环境下企业R&D投资的价值效应研究[D]. 浙江财经大学, 2015.
[26]张先轸.R&D、实物资本投资与融资约束[D]. 南开大学, 2014.
[27]Baber W R, Fairfield P M, Haggard J A.The Effect of concern about Reported Income on Discretionary Spending Decisions: The Case of Research and Development[J].Accounting Review, 1991, 66(4):818-829
[28]Perry S, Grinaker R.Earnings expectations and discretionary research and development spending[J].Accounting Horizons, 1994, 8(4):43-51
[29]贺亚楠.管理者短视与创新投资行为研究[D]. 山西大学, 2015.
[30]李素银.基于管理者短视的上市公司证券投资行为研究[D]. 暨南大学, 2011.