The cultivation of the NEV manufacturing industry: Selective or functional industrial policies?

Xiong Yongqing, Xu Wen

Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6) : 58-64.

PDF(1524 KB)
PDF(1524 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6) : 58-64.

The cultivation of the NEV manufacturing industry: Selective or functional industrial policies?

  • Xiong Yongqing, Xu Wen
Author information +
History +

Abstract

     As an emerging industry, the new energy vehicle(NEV) manufacturing industry faces the real dilemmas of high price, low market demand, high risk, and low consumer awareness in the market promotion process. Promoting the development of emerging industries such as new energy vehicles through industrial policies is a common choice of governments around the world. NEV manufacturing industry policies can be divided into selective industrial policies and functional industrial policies. There are differences in the operational mechanisms between selective and functional industrial policies. Selective industrial policies mainly rely on investment approval, guidance catalogue, purchasing subsidy, tax reduction and other measures to make the NEV manufacturing industry achieve a certain cost advantage in the competition. Functional industrial policies mainly provide a driving force for the maturity of a commercialization conditions of the NEV manufacturing industry through the input and optimization of public resources such as infrastructure construction, supporting public service, and demonstration and promotion of education. At present, there is a controversy in both theoretical and practical circles about whether emerging industries such as NEVs should be promoted with selective industrial policies or functional industrial policies.
      The demonstration and promotion of the NEV manufacturing industry in China can be divided into three stages: pre-stage, mid-stage and post-stage. This study selected 16 NEV manufacturers and 88 demonstration cities in China as research samples. Focusing on the implementation effects of the selective and functional industrial policies of China′s new energy auto industry, a comparative analysis was carried out from the three dimensions of significance, agility, and stability of policy implementation effects.
       The study results show that:(1) Selective and functional industrial policies have their own advantages and disadvantages, and they need to be complemented and coordinated. The NEV manufacturing industry, as an emerging industry, has different needs for selective or functional policies at different stages of growth. At present, the cultivation and development of the NEV manufacturing industry not only requires promoting demand with selective industrial policies, but promoting supply with functional industrial policies.(2) The significance, agility, and stability of effects of selective industrial policies have gradually declined as NEVs move through demonstration stages. The policy effect of selective industrial policies is relatively significant in the pre-stage of the demonstration and promotion of new energy vehicles, but in the mid-stage and post-stage, the effectiveness of selective industrial policies has gradually declined. In the pre-stage and mid-stage of the demonstration and promotion, the lag period of the policy effect of selective industrial policies is relatively short, but it is unstable in the post-stage. In the pre-stage of the demonstration and promotion, the stability of the policies effect of selective industrial policies was poor. This effect then increased slightly in the mid-stage and declined in the post-stage.(3) The significance, agility, and stability of the policy effect of functional industrial policies have gradually increased through the states of the NEV demonstration and promotion period. The significance of the policy effect of functional industrial policies is relatively weak in the pre-stage, but increases in the mid-stage and post-stage. In the post-stage, this effect is relatively strong. In the pre-stage and mid-stage of the demonstration and promotion, the lag period of the policy effect of functional industrial policies is relatively longer, and it is slightly extended in the post-stage. The policy effect of the functional industrial policies was stable in the pre-stage, mid-stage, and post-stage of the demonstration and promotion and did not change significantly.
      This study has three implications for optimization and adjustment of China′s NEV manufacturing industry policies:(1) With the demonstration and promotion of the NEV manufacturing industry from the pre-stage to the mid- and post-stages, the policy structure of the NEV manufacturing industry needs to be adjusted. It necessary to change from a policy structure dominated by selective industrial policies to a policy structure with functional industrial policies as the main component, supplemented by some selective policies. Promoting the development of the NEV manufacturing industry should be accomplished through the synergy of functional and selective industrial policies.(2) The implementation of functional industrial policies should be based on the construction of public charging spot construction and the "double integral" policy. In order to accelerate the transformation and upgrading of the traditional automobile industry to the NEV manufacturing industry, it is necessary to actively explore the innovative business model of constructing public charging spots and increasing the implementation of the "double credits" policy.(3) Selective industrial policy should establish a new policy structure focused on tax reduction and supplemented by the purchasing subsidy. Tax reduction will be the focus of policy implementation, reducing the cycle of tax refunds to increase the enthusiasm of manufacturers. At the same time, steadily pushing forward the implementation of subsidy reduction policy will gradually reduce the dependence on subsidy in the development of the NEV manufacturing industry.

Key words

new energy vehicle / selective industrial policy / functional industrial policy / policy effect / stage difference

Cite this article

Download Citations
Xiong Yongqing, Xu Wen. The cultivation of the NEV manufacturing industry: Selective or functional industrial policies?[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(6): 58-64

References

[1] Lall S. Comparing National Competitive Performance: An Economic Analysis of World Economic Forum's Competitiveness Index[J]. Qeh Working Papers, 2001(7):61—102

[2] 黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016(4):60-73.

Li Wenjing and Zheng Manni. Is it Substantive Innovation or Strategic Innovation?——Impact of Macroeconomic Policies on Micro-enterprises' Innovation[J]. Economic Research Journal,2016(4):60-73.

[3] 黄先海, 宋学印, 诸竹君. 中国产业政策的最优实施空间界定——补贴效应、竞争兼容与过剩破解[J].中国工业经济, 2015(4): 57-69.

Huang Xianhai,Song Xueyin and Zhu Zhujun.Defining the Optimal Space of China Industrial Policy ——Subsidy Effect,Competition Compatible and Overcapacity Solution[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2015(4): 57-69.

[4] 刘兰剑, 赵志华. 财政补贴退出后的多主体创新网络运行机制仿真——以新能源汽车为例[J].科研管理, 2016, 37(8):58-66.

Liu Lanjian,Zhao Zhihua.Simulation of the running mechanism of multi-agent innovation network when fiscal subsidy drops out:A case of new energy vehicles[J].Science Research Management, 2016, 37(8):58-66.

[5] FABER A,FRENKEN K. Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy:Towards an evolutionary environmental economics[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2009,76(4): 462-470.

[6] VON HIPPEL E. Lead users:a source of novel product concepts[J].Management science,1986,32(7): 791-805.

[7] 林毅夫. 发展战略、自生能力和经济收敛[J]. 经济学:季刊, 2002(1): 269-300.

Justin Yifu Lin. Development Strategy,Viability and Economic Convergence[J].China Economic Quarterly,2002(1): 269-300.

[8] 周叔莲, 吕铁, 贺俊. 新时期我国高增长行业的产业政策分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2008(9):46-57.

Zhou Shulian,Lu Tie,He Jun.Transformation of Industrial Policy for Chinese High-growth Industries in the New Age[J].China Industrial Economics,2008(9):46-57.

[9] 江飞涛, 李晓萍. 直接干预市场与限制竞争:中国产业政策的取向与根本缺陷[J]. 中国工业经济, 2010(9):26-36.

Jiang Feitao,Li Xiaoping.Direct Market Intervention and Restrict Competition: The Orientation of China’s Industrial Policy and Its Fundamental Defects[J].China Industrial Economics,2010(9):26-36.

[10] Ketels C H M. Industrial Policy outside the European Union: United States and Japan[J]. 2005.

[11] Lall S. Reinventing Industrial Policy: The Role of Government Policy in Building Industrial Competitiveness[J]. Annals of Economics & Finance, 2003, 14(2): 661–692.

[12] 郑吉川, 赵骅, 李志国. 双积分政策下新能源汽车产业研发补贴研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019(2)126-133.

Zheng Jichuan,Zhao Hua,Li Zhiguo.A research on new energy vehicle industry R&D subsidy under the policy of “double credits”[J].Science Research Management, 2019(2)126-133。

[13] 卢超,尤建新,戎珂,等. 新能源汽车产业政策的国际比较研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014,V35(12):26-35.

Lu Chao,You Jianxin,Rong Ke,Shi Yongjiang,Chen Yantai.International comparison of industrial policies for new-energy vehicles[J].Science Research Management,2014,V35(12):26-35.

[14] Huang Q, Yang R. A Study on Conflict and Coordination Between Industrial Policy and Competition Policy[M]// Innovative Computing and Information. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011:287-293.

[15] 熊勇清, 陈曼琳. 新能源汽车产业培育的“政策意愿”及其差异性——基于政府、制造商和消费者的网络媒体信息分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2017(10):88-96.

Xiong Yongqing,Chen Manlin.Policy Willingness and Difference of New Energy Vehicle Industry Cultivation--Based on the Internet Public Hotspot Information[J].Forum on Science and Technology in China,2017(10):88-96.

[16] 鲁明泓. 中国不同地区投资环境的评估与比较[J]. 经济研究,1994(2):64-70.

Lu Minghong.Evaluation and Comparison of Investment Environments in Different Regions of China[J]. Economic Research Journal,1994(2):64-70.

[17] Putrus G A, Suwanapingkarl P, Johnston D, et al. Impact of electric vehicles on power distribution networks[C]// Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, 2009. VPPC '09. IEEE. IEEE, 2009: 827-831.

[18] 万勇. 城市化驱动居民消费需求的机制与实证——基于效应分解视角的中国省级区域数据研究[J]. 财经研究, 2012(6):124-133.

Wan Yong.Empirical and Mechanism Study on the Increase in Residents’Consumption Demand Driven by Urbanization: Based on Provincial Data in China from the Angle of Effect Decomposition[J].Journal of Finance and Economics, 2012(6):124-133.

PDF(1524 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/