Digital inclusive finance development, financial mismatch mitigation and enterprise innovations

ZHAO Xiao-Ge; ZHONG Shi-Hu; GUO Xiao-Xin

PDF(440 KB)

Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 158-169.

Digital inclusive finance development, financial mismatch mitigation and enterprise innovations

Zhao Xiaoge¹, Zhong Shihu², Guo Xiaoxin²

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Technological innovation is the driver for economic growth. The world economic pattern is undergoing in-depth adjustment. China is at a critical junction in transforming growth mode, optimizing economic structure, and switching growth drivers. Quality development led by technological innovation is the key to overcome obstacles stunting economic development. The efficacy of innovation-driven strategy is, however, lies in the firm′s initiative in and potential of innovation. For a long period of time, the patent innovation output of firms in China has been featured by large quantity, low quality, and speculative strategy, locking China at the low end of the global technological chain. But for firms, an innovation project is a typical long-cycle, high-risk, and high-cost activity with huge capital input and uncertain output. Information asymmetry at the marketplace may result in issues like adverse selection and moral risks, leading to dual constraints by high adjusted costs and financing costs. Therefore, stable and adequate financial resources are an essential guarantee for continuous innovation at firms. Efficient and low-cost financial services are key elements for the quality output of firm innovation.
Finance is a rare resource. Appropriate financial allocation means its flow towards efficient sectors and firms. But financial resource allocation shows a mismatch featured by low-efficiency and imbalance, that is the finance mismatch between allocation structure and efficiency. The significant finance mismatch in the traditional financial system is closely associated with a low initiative for and low output efficiency of innovation among Chinese firms. In recent years, driven by emerging technologies like big data, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence, a new type of inclusive financing mode called digital inclusive finance has emerged and instantly become the focus of academia. It is of practical significance in investigating whether digital inclusive finance mitigates finance mismatch and propels firm innovation through its low-threshold, low-cost, and convenient services.
The rapid development of science and technology promotes the integration of finance and digital information, gives rise to a series of new financial businesses, and brings huge changes in people′s life. Accelerating the building of an innovation-driven country is a major task in implementing new development philosophy and developing a modern economic system. Against this backdrop, it is of practical significance to examine the impact of digital inclusive finance on firm innovation. This study adopts data of firms listed on A share of China from 2011 to 2018, matches digital inclusive finance of prefecture level cities with firm innovation, and investigates the impact of digital inclusive finance development on firm innovation and its mechanism on an empirical basis. We find the development of digital inclusive finance in regions promotes the innovation output of firms significantly. The conclusion remains consistent when a series of robustness checks like endogeneity test, and replacing dependent variables are conducted. Investigations on impact mechanism reveal the development of digital inclusive finance mitigates finance mismatch in traditional financial service and delivers incentive effect on firm innovation. Further investigation on the heterogeneity of digital inclusive finance′s impact on firm innovation shows digital inclusive finance mitigates finance mismatch and promotes innovation more evidently for firms in central and western China. This demonstrates digital inclusive finance indeed delivers inclusive effects and offers solutions to financing issues in underdeveloped regions. As for the impact of firm ownership, the results show digital inclusive finance promotes innovation at state-owned firms more evidently compared with its impact on private firms.
The conclusion of this study is of vital significance in promoting the development of digital inclusive finance, optimizing financial resource allocation, improving the level of independent innovation in China, and spurring the building of an innovation-driven country. We propose the following policy suggestions.
(1) The government should promote the stable development of digital inclusive finance and optimize financial resource allocation. The development of digital inclusive finance can, to some extent, mitigate the degree of finance mismatch and deliver incentive effect on firm innovation, spurring the development of the real economy. At present, China is at a critical junction for the transformation from high-speed growth to high-quality growth. It should follow the trend of science and technology, encourage the integration between information technology and the financial market, and promote the development of diverse financial services. Efforts should be made in promoting the development of digital inclusive finance, optimizing financial resource allocation, and lowering the financial service threshold. The purpose is to unleash the inclusive effect of digital inclusive finance and promote its role in fueling technological innovation and new growth drivers.
(2) The government should implement policies tailored for different firms and regions. One of the major differences between digital inclusive finance and traditional finance is that the former is able to identify the firm with innovation capability and offer targeted financial service, reducing the room for rent-seeking. The government should better its services by offering innovation support services for firms with different ownership, providing ample room for the development of private firms, and encouraging state-owned firms to shake off innovation inertia and to harness their potential in innovation. In particular, the government should deepen financial system reform in the central and western regions to promote coordinated and balanced development of digital inclusive finance among regions in order to fully unleash the incentive effect of digital inclusive finance on innovation.
(3) The supervision authority should improve regulatory policy to prevent systematic risk in the digital financial system. Digital inclusive finance integrates finance, technology, and the Internet. Its rapid development improves the efficiency of financial resource allocation and brings huge convenience for micro firms. The boundary between regions and financial institutions is also blurred, which may result in systematic financial risks. Therefore, the supervisory authority should develop a new supervision model and improve regulatory policy to tackle the potential risk which may result from the development of digital inclusive finance. Meanwhile, the evaluation of and accurate management of risks from digital inclusive finance worth further study.

Key words

digital inclusive finance / enterprise innovation / financial mismatch mitigation / mediating role

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Zhao Xiaoge, Zhong Shihu, Guo Xiaoxin. Digital inclusive finance development, financial mismatch mitigation and enterprise innovations[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(4): 158-169

References

[1] Romer P M. Endogenous Technological Change[J]. Journal of Political Economy，1990，98(5)：S71-S102.

[2] 黎文靖，郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究，2016，51(04)：60-73.

Li Wenjing，Zheng Manni. Is it Substantive Innovation or Strategic Innovation?——Impact of Macroeconomic Policies on Micro-enterprises' Innovation[J]. Economic Research Journal，2016，51(04)：60-73.

[3] Berger A N，Udell G F. Collateral，Loan Quality and Bank Risk[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics，1990，25(1)：21-42.

[4] 唐松，伍旭川，祝佳. 数字金融与企业技术创新——结构特征、机制识别与金融监管下的效应差异[J]. 管理世界，2020，36(05)：52-66+9.

Tang Song，Wu Xuchuan，Zhu Jia. Digital Finance and Enterprise Technology Innovation: Structural Feature, Mechanism Identification and Effect Difference under Financial Supervision [J]. Management World，2020，36(05)：52-66+9.

[5] 周煜皓，张盛勇. 金融错配、资产专用性与资本结构[J]. 会计研究，2014(08)：75-80+97.

Zhou Yuhao，Zhang Shengyong. Financial Misallocation, Asset Specificity and Capital Structure [J]. Accounting Research，2014(08)：75-80+97.

[6] 郭峰，孔涛，王靖一. 互联网金融空间集聚效应分析——来自互联网金融发展指数的证据[J]. 国际金融研究，2017(08)：75-85.

Guo Feng，Kong Tao，Wang Jingyi. The Spatial Agglomeration Effect of Internet Finance——Evidence from the Financial Development Index[J]. Studies of International Finance，2017(08)：75-85.

[7] 谢绚丽，沈艳，张皓星，郭峰. 数字金融能促进创业吗?——来自中国的证据[J]. 经济学(季刊)，2018，17(04)：1557-1580.

Xie Xuanli，Shen Yan，Zhang Haoxing，Guo Feng. Can Digital Finance Promote Entrepreneurship——Evidence from China [J]. China Economic Quarterly，2018，17(04)：1557-1580.

[8] 吴延兵. 企业规模、市场力量与创新：一个文献综述[J]. 经济研究，2007(05)：125-138.

Wu Yanbing. Firm Size, Market Concentration and Innovation: A Survey [J]. Economic Research Journal，2007(05)：125-138.

[9] 李春涛，宋敏. 中国制造业企业的创新活动：所有制和CEO激励的作用[J]. 经济研究，2010，45(05)：55-67.

Li Chuntao，Song Min. Innovation Activities in Chinese Manufacturing Firms: The Roles of Firm Ownership and CEO Incentives [J]. Economic Research Journal，2010，45(05)：55-67.

[10] 冯根福，温军. 中国上市公司治理与企业技术创新关系的实证分析[J]. 中国工业经济，2008(07)：91-101.

Feng Genfu，Wen Jun. An Empirical Study on Relationship between Corporate Governance and Technical Innovation of Chinese Listed Companies [J]. China Industrial Economics，2008(07)：91-101.

[11] Lin M，Prabhala N R，Viswanathan S. Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep： Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending[J]. Management Science，2013，59(1)：17-35.

[12] 申宇，赵玲，吴风云. 创新的母校印记：基于校友圈与专利申请的证据[J]. 中国工业经济，2017(08)：156-173.

Shen Yu，Zhao Ling，Wu Fengyun. Deeply Mark of Mother School on Innovation: Evidence from Alumni Networks and Patent Applications [J]. China Industrial Economics，2017(08)：156-173.

[13] 江飞涛，李晓萍. 直接干预市场与限制竞争：中国产业政策的取向与根本缺陷[J]. 中国工业经济，2010(09)：26-36.

Jiang Feitao，Li Xiaoping. Direct Market Intervention and Restrict Competition: The Orientation of China’s Industrial Policy and Its Fundamental Defects [J]. China Industrial Economics，2010(09)：26-36.

[14] Castellacci F, Lie C M. Do the Effects of R&D Tax Credits Cary across Industries? A Meta-regression Analysis[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(4): 819-832.

[15] 易信，刘凤良. 金融发展、技术创新与产业结构转型——多部门内生增长理论分析框架[J]. 管理世界，2015(10)：24-39+90.

Yi Xin，Liu Fengliang. Financial Development, Technological Innovation and Industrial Structure Transformation ——The Theoretical Framework of Multi-sector Endogenous Growth [J]. Management World，2015(10)：24-39+90.

[16] 傅秋子，黄益平. 数字金融对农村金融需求的异质性影响——来自中国家庭金融调查与北京大学数字普惠金融指数的证据[J]. 金融研究，2018(11)：68-84.

Fu Qiuzi，Huang Yiping. Digital Finance’s Heterogeneous Effects On Rural Financial Demand:Evidence From China Household Finance Survey and Inclusive Digital Finance Index [J]. Journal of Financial Research，2018(11)：68-84.

[17] 张勋，万广华，张佳佳，何宗樾. 数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长[J]. 经济研究，2019，54(08)：71-86.

Zhang Xun，Wan Guanghua，Zhang Jiajia，He Zongyue. Digital Economy, Financial Inclusion, and Inclusive Growth [J]. Economic Research Journal，2019，54(08)：71-86.

[18] 陈斌开，林毅夫. 金融抑制、产业结构与收入分配[J]. 世界经济，2012，35(01)：3-23.

Chen Binkai，Lin Yifu. Financial Repression, Industrial Structure and Income Distribution [J]. The Journal of

World Economy，2012，35(01)：3-23.

[19] 李继尊. 关于互联网金融的思考[J]. 管理世界，2015(07)：1-7+16.

Li Jizun. Thoughts on Internet Finance [J]. Management World，2015(07)：1-7+16.

[20] Duarte J，Siegel S，Young L. Trust and Credit：The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-Peer Lending[J]. The Review of Financial Studies，2012，25(8)：2455-2484.

[21] Norden L，Buston C S，Wagner W. Financial Innovation and Bank Behavior：Evidence from Credit Markets[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control，2014，43：130-145.

[22] Demertzis M，Merler S，Wolff G B. Capital Markets Union and the Fintech Opportunity[J]. Journal of Financial Regulation，2018，4(1)：157-165.

[23] 王振山.金融效率论——金融资源优化配置的理论与实践[D]. 东北财经大学，1999.

Wang Zhenshan. Theory of Financial Efficiency——Theory and Practice of Optimal Allocation of Financial Resources [D]. Dongbei University Of Finance And Economics，1999.

[24] 鲁晓东. 金融资源错配阻碍了中国的经济增长吗[J]. 金融研究，2008(04)：55-68.

Lu Xiaodong. Is the Financial Distortions Holding Back China's Economic Growth [J]. Journal of Financial Research，2008(04)：55-68.

[25] 李爽. 要素价格扭曲、政治关联与中国工业企业的技术创新积极性[J]. 财贸研究，2018，29(07)：1-14.

Li Shuang. Factor Price Distortion, Political Connection and Technological Innovation Enthusiasm of Chinese Industrial Enterprises [J]. Finance and Trade Research，2018，29(07)：1-14.

[26] 冉茂盛，同小歌.金融错配、政治关联与企业创新产出[J].科研管理，2020，41(10):89-97.

Ran Maosheng，Tong Xiaoge. Financial Misallocation，Political Connection and Innovation Output of Enterprises [J]. Science Research Management，2020，41(10)：89-97.

[27] 钟腾，汪昌云. 金融发展与企业创新产出——基于不同融资模式对比视角[J]. 金融研究，2017(12)：127-142.

Zhong Teng，Wang Changyun. Financial Development and Firm － level Innovation Output:A Perspective of Comparing Different Financing Patterns [J]. Journal of Financial Research，2017(12)：127-142.

[28] 罗来军，蒋承，王亚章. 融资歧视、市场扭曲与利润迷失——兼议虚拟经济对实体经济的影响[J]. 经济研究，2016，51(04)：74-88.

Luo Laijun，Jiang Cheng，Wang Yazhang. Financing Discrimination, Market Distortions and Profit Lost——Also Discussing the Influence of Virtual Economy on Real Economy [J]. Economic Research Journal，2016，51(04)：74-88.

[29] 李青原，潘雅敏，陈晓. 国有经济比重与我国地区实体经济资本配置效率——来自省级工业行业数据的证据[J]. 经济学家，2010(01)：38-48.

Li Qingyuan，Pan Yamin，Chen Xiao. Proportion of State-owned Economy and Capital Allocation Efficiency of Regional Real Economy in China ——Evidence from Provincial Industrial Data [J]. Economist，2010(01)：38-48.

[30] Modigliani F，Miller M H. The Cost of Capital，Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment[J]. The American Economic Review，1958，48(3)：261-297.

[31] 戴静，杨筝，刘贯春，许传华. 银行业竞争、创新资源配置和企业创新产出——基于中国工业企业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究，2020(02)：51-70.

Dai Jing，Yang Zheng，Liu Guanchun，Xu Chuanhua. Bank Competition, Innovation Resource Allocation, and Firm Innovation Output: Empirical Evidence from the China Industry Census Database [J]. Journal of Financial Research，2020(02)：51-70.

[32] 毕茜，于连超.环境税与企业技术创新：促进还是抑制？[J].科研管理，2019，40(12)：116-125.

Bi Qian，Yu Lianchao. Environmental Tax and Enterprise Technological Innovation: Promotion or Suppression? [J]. Science Research Management，2019，40(12)：116-125

[33] 李春涛，闫续文，宋敏，杨威. 金融科技与企业创新——新三板上市公司的证据[J]. 中国工业经济，2020(01)：81-98.

Li Chuntao，Yan Xuwen，Song Min，Yang Wei. Fintech and Corporate Innovation——Evidence from Chinese NEEQ-Listed Companies [J]. China Industrial Economics，2020(01)：81-98.

[34] 邵挺.金融错配、所有制结构与资本回报率:来自1999～2007年我国工业企业的研究[J].金融研究，2010(09)：51-68.

Shao Ting. Financial misallocation, Ownership, and Capital Return: A study of Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises from 1999 to 2007 [J]. Journal of Financial Research，2010(09)：51-68.

[35] 温忠麟，叶宝娟. 中介效应分析：方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展，2014，22(05)：731-745.

Wen Zhonglin，Ye Baojuan. Analyses of Mediating Effects: The Development of Methods and Models [J]. Advances in Psychological Science，2014，22(05)：731-745.