A research on the policy-making process of the interaction-oriented emerging industry

Abstract

Abstract: This paper discusses how governments make policies under the circumstances with high uncertainties through interactions. By using content analysis of three macro government policy making processes in internet of things (IOT) industry in China, we have obtained the following results. Firstly, the macro government policy making process is composed of several incremental issues and stages in which micro-level policies are formed based on the interactions to affect the behavior of industry sectors directly. Secondly, there are five approaches of interactions among various hierarchies of governments and between governments and industry sectors in China. Interaction approaches used by interactive leaders vary with their administration positions or natures of macro policies. Thirdly, the regularities of interactions vary with the different natures of macro policies. These findings elaborate the perspective by reference to how different actor categories interact with each other to promote decision information clearer and suggest theoretical and empirical basis for policy makers to build policy making system based on interactions for the development of emerging industries.

Key words: interaction, emerging industry, policy-making processes, IOT industry

CLC Number:

F202

Tian Zhilong, Shi Jun. A research on the policy-making process of the interaction-oriented emerging industry[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(5): 139-148.

References

[1] Spencer, J. W., Murtha, T. P., Lenway, S. A. How governments matter to new industry creation [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005. 30(2):321-337. [2] Canter, U., Pyka, A. Classifying technology policy from an evolutionary perspective [J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30(5):759-775. [3] Murtha, T. P., Lenway, S. A., Hart, J. A. Managing new industry creation: Global knowledge formation and entrepreneurship in high technology [M]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001. [4] Kreiser, P., Marino, L. Analyzing the historical development of the environmental uncertainty constructs [J]. Management Decision. 2002, 40(9):895-905. [5] Eisenhardt, K. M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32(3):543-576. [6] Phaal, R,. O'sullivan, E,. Routley, M., et al. A framework for mapping industrial emergence [J]. Technological Forecasting Social Change, 2010, 78(2): 217-230. [7] 郭巍青,涂峰.重新建构政策过程:基于政策网络的视角[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 49(3):161-168. Guo Weiqing, Tu Feng. Reframing policy process: from the perspective of policy networks [J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Social Science Edition) 2009, 49(3):161-168. [8] Tatenhove, J. V., Edelenbos, J., Klok, P. J. Power and interactive policy-making: A comparative study of power and influence in 8 interactive projects in the Netherlands [J]. Public Administration, 2010, 88(3): 609-626. [9] Heilmann, S. From local experiments to national policy: The origins of China's distinctive Policy Process[J]. The China Journal, 2008, 59 (1):1-30. [10] Hillman, J., Hitt, M. Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation and strategy decisions [J].[QX(Y12#] [QX)]Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(4):825-842. [11] Suarez, F. F. Battles for technological dominance: An integrative framework [J]. Research Policy, 2004.33(2):271-286. [12] 周黎安.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,2007(7):36-50. ZhouLian. Governing China's local officials: An analysis of promotion tournament model [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2007(7): 36-50. [13] Lundberg, H., Andresen, E. Cooperation among companies, universities and local government in a Swedish context [J].Industrial Marketing Management, 2012.41(3): 429-437. [14] 洪银兴.科技创新与创新型经济[J].管理世界, 2011(7):1-8 HongYinxing. Science innovation and innovative economy [J]. Management World, 2011(7):1-8. [15] 任勇. 政策网络的两种分析途径及其影响[J].公共管理学报, 2005,2 (3):55-59,69. Ren Yong. On the two kinds of analysis approaches of policy network and the influence [J]. Journal of Public Management, 2005,2 (3):55-59,69. [16] 陈玲.制度、精英与共识:寻求中国政策过程的解释框架[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,2005. Chen Ling.Institution, elite and consensus: Looking for the interpretation frame of China's policy process [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press,2005. [17] 王绍光.学习机制与适应能力:中国农村合作医疗体制变迁的启示[J]. 中国社会科学, 2008(6):111-207. WangShaoguang. Learning and adapting: The case of rural health care financing in China [J]. Social Sciences in China, 2008(6): 111-207. [18] Shaffer, B., Quasnery, T., Grimm, C. Firm level performance implications of non-market actions [J]. Business and Society, 2000.39(2):126-143. [19] Tian, Z. L., Hafsi, T. Wei, W. Institutional determinism and political strategies: An empirical investigation [J]. Business and Society, 2009. 48(3): 284-325. [20] Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. R. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23(2):224-253 [21] Child, J., Rodrigues, S, B., Tes, K. K. The dynamics of influence in corporate co-evolution [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 49 (7):1246-1273. [22] Tsui, A. S. Contextualization in Chinese management research [J]. Management and Organization Review, 2006, 2(1):1-13. [23] Yin, R. K. Case study research: Design and methods (3^rd Edition) [M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2002. [24] Patton, M. Q. How to use qualitative methods in evaluation [M]. California: Sage Publications, 1987. [25] 殷华方,潘镇,鲁明泓.中央-地方政府关系和政策执行力:以外资产业政策为例[J]. 管理世界, 2007(7):22-36. YinHuafang, Pan Zhen, Lu Minghong. The central-local government relationship and policy execution: A case of foreign investment industrial policy [J]. Management World, 2007(7):22-36. [26] 罗党论,应千伟.政企关系、官员视察与企业绩效-来自中国制造业上市企业的经验证据[J]. 南开管理评论,2012,15(5):74-83. Luo, Danglun, Ying, Qianwei. Political connection, official inspection and firm performance:The empirical evidence come from Chinese manufacturing listed companies [J]. NanKai Management Review, 2012,15 (5): 74-83. [27] 徐现祥,王贤彬,舒元.地方官员与经济增长[J].经济研究, 2007(9):18-31 Xu Xianxiang, Wang Xianbin, Shu Yuan. Local officials and economic growth [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2007(9):18-31. [28] Watts, R. A., Frick, K. T., Maddison, J. Policy making, incrementalism, and news discourse: Gasoline tax debates in Eight U.S. States [J]. Public Works Management & Policy. 2012, 17(3): 238-255. [29] Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W. Industrial innovation and public policy: Preparing for the 1980s and 1990s [M]. London: Frances Printer. 1981. [30] 金太军,袁建军.政府与企业的交换模式及其演变规律-观察腐败深层机制的微观视角[J].中国社会科学,2011(1):102-118. JinTaijun, Yuan Jianjun. A government enterprise exchange model and its evolutionary laws: A micro perspective for examining the underlying mechanism of corruption [J]. Social Sciences in China, 2011(1):102-118. [31] Edquist, C. Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: Identification of systemic problems (or failures) [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2011, 20 (6): 1725-1753. [32] 朱旭峰. "司长策国论"中国政策决策过程的科层结构与政策专家参与[J].公共管理评论,2002(7):42-62. ZhuXufeng. "Decisions by bureau chiefs": Hierarchical structure of the Chinese decision-making process and participation by policy experts [J]. China Public Administration review, 2002(7):42-62. [33] 朱旭峰, 王倩茹. 政府决策者能力与专家咨询选择:基于天津市政府官员的实证研究[J]. 公共行政评论, 2010,3 (4): 47-67. ZhuXufeng, Wang Qianru. Competency of government decision makers and expert advisory: An empirical study based on Tianjin government cadres [J]. Journal of Public Administration, 2010,3(4):47-67.