Single factor efficiency analysis in different types of technological innovation activities

Abstract

Abstract: In order to obtain contribution of each innovation factor to efficiency of technological innovation, the paper distinguishes basic research, applied research and experimental development, and estimates the single factor efficiency of each innovation factor based on the stochastic frontier production function. The estimation results show that the single factor efficiency of basic research is higher than applied research's and experimental development's, R&D funds' efficiency in basic research and applied research is higher than R&D scientific and technical personnel's efficiency, but R&D scientific and technical personnel's efficiency is higher than R&D funds' efficiency in experimental development. Efficiency of scientific papers and patents as factors input are very low, efficiency of new product development expenditure is low, single efficiency of innovation input has greatly rising space. There are large regional differences in the efficiency of innovation in China, different province has different advantage of innovation efficiency, China should increase innovation investment. What's more, we should raise theefficiency of R&D funds and manpower input, and reverse "number oriented" of scientific papers and "supply oriented" of patent.

Key words: basic research, applied research, experimental development, efficiency of R&D funds, efficiency of R&D personnel

CLC Number:

F062.9

Huang Ping. Single factor efficiency analysis in different types of technological innovation activities[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(11): 64-70.

References

[1]钟祖昌.研发创新SBM效率的国际比较研究——基于OECD国家和中国的实证分析[J].财经研究, 2011,37(9):80-90.Zhong Zuchang.Research on international comparison of innovation SBM efficiency:Empirical analysis based on OECD members and China.[J]Journal of Finance and Economics.2011, 37(9):80-90. [2]郭磊,刘志迎,周志翔.基于DEA交叉效率模型的区域技术创新效率评价研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011, 32(11):138-143.Zhong Zuchang.Research on international comparison of innovation SBM efficiency:Empirical analysis based on OECD members and China.[J]Journal of Finance and Economics.2011, 37(9):80-90. [3]李新春,李胜文,张书军.高技术与非高技术产业创新的单要素效率[J].中国工业经济,2010,266(5):68-77.Li Xinchun,Li Shengwen,Zhang Shujun.Single factor efficiency analysis in high-tech and non-high-tech industryinnovative activities.[J].China Industrial Economics.2010, 266(5):68-77. [4]吴延兵.国有企业双重效率损失研究[J].经济研究, 2012(3):15-27.Wu Yanbin. The dual efficiency lossers in Chinese state-owned enterprises.[J].Economic Research Journal, 2012(3):15-27. [5] Fried,Lovell,Schmidt,Yaisawarng.Accounting for environmental effectsand statistical noisein data envelopment analysis[J].Journal of Productivity Analysis,2002(17):121-136. [6] Castelli L.,Pesenti R.,Ukovich W.,A classification of DEA models whenthe internalstructure of the decision making units is considered[J]. Structure of Operations Research,2010, 1(173):207-235. [7] Reinhard,Stijn, C. A. Knox Lovell,and Geert Thijssen. Econometric estimation of technical and environmental efficiency:An application to dutch dairy farms[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999,81(1):44-60. [8]李鑫,欧名豪.中国省际建设用地单要素效率评价与区域差异研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2012,12(1):80-84.Li Xin, Ou Minghao. An evaluation of China's provincial construction land single factor efficiency and its regional differences.[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Science Edition).2012,12(1):80-84. [9]余泳泽,刘大勇.我国区域创新效率的空间外溢效应与价值链外溢效应-创新价值链视角下的多维空间面板模型研究[J].管理世界,2013(7):6-20.Yu Yongze, Liu Dayong.The effect of the space outflow of China's regional innovation and the effect of the outflowof value chains:A study, from the perspective of the innovative value chain,on the model of the panel of multidimensional space.[J].Management World,2013(7):6-20. [10]黄苹.中国省域R&D溢出与地区经济增长空间面板数据模型分析[J].科学学研究,2008,26(4):749-753.Huang Ping. Spatial panel data models analysis on investment of provincial R&D and regional economical growth in China.[J].Studies in Science of Science, 2008,26(4):749-753. [11]柳卸林,胡志坚.中国区域创新能力的分布与成因[J].科学学研究, 2002.20(5):550-555.Liu Xielin, Hu Zhijian.The pattern of China regional innovation capability and its implication.[J].Studies in Science of Science,2002.20(5):550-555.

[1]	Wang Yu, Xia Junnuo, Wang Xiaona. The research on the impact of financial-industrial on corporate different types of R&D investment [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(2): 118-125.
[2]	Han Fengqin, Li Dan. Promotion of reforms in basic research institutes with a two-tier governance system [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(12): 198-203.
[3]	Wang Fang, Zhao Lanxiang, Dai Xiaoyong. An analysis of the determinants of the preference heterogeneity of basic research of Chinese firms [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(3): 12-22.
[4]	Jiang Shuyang, Zhuang Yaming, Ding Lei. Industry-university-institute basic research cooperation, selection of fiscal and tax incentives and breakthrough innovation of enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(10): 40-47.
[5]	Zhao Jinping, Shan Gu, Liu Qixia. An analysis of the contributing factors to Japan′s successes in winning Nobel Prize in natural sciences [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(10): 125-133.
[6]	Zhang Xun. A research on the effectiveness of basic scientific research of industry-specific universities by taking Beijing Jiaotong University as an example [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(12): 323-326.
[7]	. The investment in basic researches: Policy defects and cognition misunderstanding [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(5): 87-93.
[8]	Huang Ping. Effects of R&D investment structure on growth and optimal intensity of basic research [J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(8): 53-57.
[9]	Song Yinqiu, Lv Ping, Huang Wen. The structure comparison of Sino-US R&D expenditure [J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (4): 102-107.
[10]	WANG Dong-Mei. The evaluation of scientific research on the school funds based on PCA-DEA [J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(4): 102-105.
[11]	Guan Shiping, Zhu Weidong. The variation tendency of regional difference for China's basic research and its decomposition [J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(12): 97-103.
[12]	Wang Dongmei. Analysis on the guidance of science fund system for the cooperation of basic research [J]. Science Research Management, 2010, 31(4): 98-101 .
[13]	Xu Zhi， Zhou Jizhong . “Enigma of Chinese basic research intensity” ——An explanation based on the AH model [J]. Science Research Management, 2008, 29(5): 63-69 .