Alliance networks’ characteristics and change of organizational learning patterns：A longitudinal case study

Abstract

Abstract: Applying a longitudinal case study method based on event history analysis, the paper takes Sony's alliance networks between 1995 and 2012 as the case and investigates the relationship between four characteristics of alliance networks and organizational learning patterns, including the types of alliance networks, the level of resource commitment, duration of interactive relationships, and types of network partner capabilities. The research results show that, compared with 1995~2004, Sony managed to transform from less explorative learning to more exploitive learning during the period of 2005~2012 by concluding relatively more equity agreements, increasing the level of resource commitment, strengthening the tieswith its existing partners, and searching for network partners with homogeneous capabilities.The results of case study imply that managers can achieve the change of organizational learning patterns by deliberately designing the alliance network portfolio and alliance networks' characteristics.

Key words: alliance networks, exploitive learning, explorative learning, longitudinal case study, Sony Corporation

CLC Number:

C935
F273.7

Song Zhihong, He Yang, Li Dongmei. Alliance networks’ characteristics and change of organizational learning patterns：A longitudinal case study[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(8): 126-133.

References

[1] Hagedoorn, J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences[J]. Strategic Management Journal.1993, 14(5): 371-385. [2] Heimeriks, K., Duysters, G. Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance: An empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process[J]. Journal of Management Studies. 2007, 44(1):25-49. [3] Afuah, A. How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change[J]? Strategic Management Journal. 2000, 21(3):387-404. [4] Grant, R. and Baden-Fuller, C. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances[J]. Journal of Management Studies.2004(41): 61-84. [5] 李垣, 陈浩然, 赵文红. 组织间学习、控制方式与自主创新关系研究—基于两种技术差异情景的比较分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2008(2):199-204. [6] Tsai,W. Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal. 2001, 44(5): 996-1004. [7] 潘松挺, 郑亚莉. 网络关系强度与企业技术创新绩效—基于探索式学习和利用式学习的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2011(11): 1736-1743. [8] Lavie, D. and Rosenkopf, L. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation[J]. Academy of Management Journal.2006, 49(4): 797-818. [9] Huber, G.,Organizational learning: The contribution processes and the literatures[J]. Organization Science. 1991, 2(1): 88-115. [10] March,J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J].Organization Science.1991,2(1):71-87. [11] Dittrich,K., Duysters,G., Ard-Pieter de Man. Strategic repositioning by means of alliance networks: the case of IBM[J]. Research Policy. 2007(36): 1496-1511. [12] Gupta,A.K., Smith, K.G., Shalley, C.E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of Management Journal. 2006, 49(4): 693-706 [13] 彭新敏. 企业网络与利用性－探索性学习的关系研究:基于创新视角[J].科研管理, 2011(3):15-22. [14] Granovetter, M.S.The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology. 1973, 78(6):1360-1380. [15] Duysters, G and Ard-Pieter de Man. Collaboration and innovation: A review of the effects of mergers, acquisitions and alliances on innovation[J].Technovation. 2005 (25): 1377-1387. [16] Rowley, T., Behrens, D. and Krackhardt, D. Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 2000(21):369-386. [17] 蔡宁, 潘松挺. 网络关系强度与企业技术创新模式的耦合性及其协同演化: 以海正药业技术创新网络为例[J]. 中国工业经济,2008(4):137-144. [18] Brass, D. J., K. D. Butterfield, and B. C. Skaggs. Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review. 1998, 23 (1): 14-21. [19] Koza MP, Lewin AY. The co-evolution of strategic alliances[J]. Organization Science.1998, 9(3): 255-264. [20] Levitt B, March J.G. Organizational learning[J]. Annual Review of Sociology.1988(14): 319-340. [21] 宋志红, 李常洪, 李冬梅. 技术联盟网络与知识管理动机的匹配性 [J]. 科学学研究,2013(1):104-114.