Team knowledge transfer：The role of diversity and network transitivity

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the social capital theory, this article explored the influencing factors during the process of knowledge transfer in the use of multiple regression models, examined the mediating role of social network transitivity between team diversity and intra-team knowledge transfer within enterprises. Research process undertaken based on the training, a total of 92 teams with 1159 individuals who came from a China bank participated in the survey. The results showed that the transitivity played the fully mediating role between educational diversity and knowledge transfer and the partially mediating role that links age diversity to knowledge transfer. Moreover, age diversity has a significant influence on both transitivity and intra-team knowledge transfer.

Key words: knowledge transfer, social capital, diversity, network transitivity

CLC Number:

F276.6

Wei Jun, Li Miaomiao. Team knowledge transfer：The role of diversity and network transitivity[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(5): 70-76.

References

[1] Faraj, S., Yan. A boundary work in knowledge teams[J].Journal of applied psychology, 2009, 94 (3):604-617. [2] Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., McEvily, B. How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2004, 49 (1): 101-133. [3] Wang, S., Noe, R. A. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2010, 20(2): 115-131. [4] Joshi, K. D., Sarker, S. Knowledge transfer among face-to-face information systems development team members: Examining the role of knowledge, source, and relational context[C]. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004: 1-11. [5] Zarraga, C. and Bonache, J. The impact of team atmosphere on knowledge outcomes in self-managed teams[J]. Organization Studies, 2005, 26(5): 661-681. [6] Levin, D. Z. and Cross, R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(1): 1477-1490. [7] Lawrence, B. S. The black box of organizational demography[J]. Organization Science, 1997, 8(1): 1-22. [8] Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., Erhardt, N. L. Recent research on team and organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implicati-ons[J]. Journal of Management, 2003,29(6): 801-830. [9] Pelled, L. H. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory[J]. Organization Science, 1996, 7(6): 615-631. [10] Joshi, A., Roh, H. The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review[J]. Academy of Mana-gement Journal, 2009, 52(3): 599-627. [11] Dahlin, K. B., Weingart, L. R., Hinds, P. J. Team diversity and information use[J], Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(6): 1107-1123. [12] Kearney, E., Gebert, D. and Voelpel, S. C. When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members'need for cognition[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52 (3): 581-598. [13] Argote, L., Ingram, P. Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2000, 82(1): 150-169. [14] Turner, J. C. Toward a cognitive definition of the group[C]. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social Identity and Inter-group Relations Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982: 15-40. [15] Zenger, T. R., Lawrence, B. S. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32(2): 353-376. [16] Bunderson, J. S., Sutcliffe, K. M. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(6): 875-893. [17] Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. Absorptive Capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152. [18] Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(6-7): 587-613. [19] Scott, J. Social network analysis : A handbook[M], 2nd ed., Sage, London. 2000. [20] Burt, R. S. Models of network structure[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1980, 6: 79-141. [21] Sessa, V. I., Jackson, S. E. Diversity in decision-making teams: All differences are not created equal. In Chemers, M. M., Oskamp, S., Costanzo, M. A. (Eds), Diversity in organizations: new perspectives for a changing workplace[C], Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995, 133-156. [22] Louch, H. Personal network integration: transitivity and homophily in strong-tie relations[J]. Social Networks, 2000,22(1): 45-64. [23] Inkpen, A. C., Tsang, E. W. K. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(1):146-165. [24] Hansen, M. T. The Search-Transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits[J]. Adminis-trative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(1): 82-111. [25] Joshi, K. D., Sarker, S., Sarker, S. Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: Examining the role of knowledge source attributes[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2007, 43(2): 322-335. [26] Wei, J., Zhang, D. Developing and testing a competency model of risk managers in a commercial bank[J]. Management World, 2007, 6: 86-93. [27] James, L. R., Brett, J. M. Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984, 69(2): 307-321. [28] Ibarra, H. Network centrality, power and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36(3): 471-501. [29] Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J. and Kraimer, M. L. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(2): 316-325. [30] Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., Freeman, L. C. Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis[M], Harvard: Analytic Technologies, 2002. [31] Karlberg, M. Testing transitivity in graphs[J]. Social Networks, 1997,19(4): 325-343. [32] Everett, M. G., Borgatti, S. P. Analyzing clique overlap[J]. Connections, 1998,21(1): 49-61. [33] Hermalin, B. E., Weisbach, M. S. The determinants of board composition[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1988,19(4): 589-606. [34] Edwards, J. R., Lambert, L. S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis[J]. Psychological Methods, 2007, 12(1): 1-22. [35] Kossinets, G., Watts, D. Origins of homophily in an evolving social network[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2009, 115(2): 405-450.