The integrated effect of executive incentives on technology innovation—Empirical research based on high-tech listed companies

Xu Ning, Xu Xiangyi

Science Research Management ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9) : 46-53.

PDF(931 KB)
PDF(931 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9) : 46-53.

The integrated effect of executive incentives on technology innovation—Empirical research based on high-tech listed companies

  • Xu Ning, Xu Xiangyi
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Organizational control theory under the framework of the innovation economics motivates the evolution of the core problem of corporate governance from "Value Distribution" to "Value Creation". This paper redefines and estimates the effect of executive incentives from the dimensions of promoting technological innovation, and conducts an empirical research on the relationship between monetary incentive, equity incentive and control rights incentive and their integrated effect on technology innovation by using the balanced Panel Data from 2007~2010 of Chinese high-tech listed companies. The research result shows that the duel moderating effects of monetary incentive and control rights incentive, equity incentive have a positive effect on the technology innovation. Specifically, there is a complementary relationship between monetary incentive and equity incentive and there is a substitutive relationship between control rights incentive and equity incentive. Therefore, orientated by the technological innovation, a Chinese high-tech company should establish an integration system with executive incentives featuring strengthened equity incentive, stable monetary incentive and weakened control rights incentive.

Key words

Executive incentives / technology innovation / integrated effect

Cite this article

Download Citations
Xu Ning, Xu Xiangyi. The integrated effect of executive incentives on technology innovation—Empirical research based on high-tech listed companies[J]. Science Research Management. 2013, 34(9): 46-53

References

[1] 温成玉,刘志新.技术并购对高技术上市公司创新绩效的影响[J].科研管理,2011,33(5):1-7.
[2] Wright, M., Hoskisson, R.E. and Busenitz, L.W. Firm rebirth: buyouts as facilitators of strategic growth and entrepreneurship[J]. Academy of Management Executive, 2001, 15(1): 111–125.
[3] 张治河,周国华,胡锐,谢忠泉.创新学:一个驱动21世纪发展的新兴学科[J].科研管理,2011,33(12):143-156.
[4] O' Sullivan M. The innovation enterprise and corporate governance[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2000, 24: 393-416.
[5] Hemmer, T., O. Kim, and R. Verrecchia. Introducing convexity into optimal compensation contacts[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1999, 28: 307-327.
[6] Chen Ming-yuan. Managerial compensation and R&D investments: the role of the external managerial labour market[J]. International Review of Applied Economics, 2010, 24(5): 553-572.
[7] 唐清泉,徐欣,曹媛.股权激励、研发投入与企业可持续发展——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2009(8):77-84.
[8] 李春涛,宋敏.中国制造业企业的创新活动:所有制和CEO 激励的作用[J].经济研究,2010(5):55-67.
[9] Belloc F. Corporate Governance and Innovation: A survey[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys,2011(1):1-37.
[10] 陈冬华,梁上坤,蒋德权.不同市场化进程下高管激励契约的成本与选择:货币薪酬与在职消费[J].会计研究,2010(11):56-64.
[11] 孙世敏,王昂,贾剑峰.基于价值创造和动态基础薪酬的经营者激励机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2011(5):153-159.
[12] 徐宁,徐向艺.公司治理理论演进趋势研究——基于经济学与法学的整合视角[J].经济与管理研究,2009(12):62-66.
[13] 刘金石,王贵.公司治理理论:异同探源、评介与比较[J].经济学动态,2011(5):80-85.
[14] Jensen, Michael C, and Meckling, William H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4):305-360.
[15] Wu, Jianfeng, and Tu, Runtig. CEO stock option pay and R&D spending:A behavioral agency explanation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2007, 60(5): 482-492.
[16] Lin, C., Lin, P., Song, F., Li, C. Managerial Incentives, CEO Characteristics and Corporate Innovation in China' s Private Sector[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2011, 39(2):176-190.
[17] 张洪辉,夏天,王宗军.公司治理对我国企业创新效率影响实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2010,22(3):44-50.
[18] Dale-Olsen, H. Executive Pay Determination and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from A Compressed Wage Environment[J]. The Manchester School, 2012, 80(3): 355-376.
[19] Algrawal A, Knoeber C. Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1996, 31 (3):377-397.
[20] Ward, A.J., Brown, J. A., Rodriguez, D. Governance bundles, firm performance, and the substitutability and complementarity of governance mechanisms[J]. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2009, 17(5): 646-660.
[21] 黄慧群.控制权作为企业家的激励约束因素:理论分析及现实解释意义[J].经济研究,2000(1):41-47.
[22] 姜付秀,黄继承. 经理激励、负债与企业价值[J]. 经济研究,2011(5):46-60.
[23] 王华,黄之骏.经营者股权激励、董事会组成与企业价值——基于内生性视角的经验分析[J].管理世界,2006(9):102-116.
[24] 任海云.股权结构与企业R&D投入关系的实证研究——基于A股制造业上市公司的数据分析[J].中国软科学,2010(5):126-135.
PDF(931 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/