Research on the validity of policy implementation process of awarded points forminority candidates in national college entrance examination

Wu Cinan

Science Research Management ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11) : 61-68,160.

Wu Cinan

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The policy of awarded points for minority candidates in the national college entrance examination is a policy for the care of the national identityofminority candidates. But due to lack of analysis on the validity of the policy implementation process, the effects of the policy are not obvious to increase higher education opportunities for the minorities. In this paper, by analyzing and comparing the results of scores and awarded points policy between minority candidates and Hancandidates in Guizhou Province, the following findings may be drawn out: (1) Achievement gap between minority candidates and Hancandidates in Guizhouis an objective reality and the disparity is more obvious among ruralcandidates;(2) The gap of minority candidates in examining subjects presents cultural selective features; (3) The awarded points policy and the pre-education policy is very effective to compensate for minority candidates.The future reform on the national college entrance examination should reasonably take different measures for urban and rural minority candidates and assessfully the awarded pints policy for minority candidates. The reform on examining subjects should take full account of the cultural attributes of the curriculum, which means the different candidate groups on the selection of subjects are different.The paper also presents some basic data to achievea relatively faireffortamong different nationalities in the national college entrance examination.

Key words

minority ethnic groups / awarded points inthe national college entrance examination / regionalism / validity / fairness

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Wu Cinan. Research on the validity of policy implementation process of awarded points forminority candidates in national college entrance examination[J]. Science Research Management. 2013, 34(11): 61-68,160

References

[1] 程家福,董美英,李瑛.高考加分政策的异化及治理:资本视角[J].黑龙江高教研究,2011(7):8-11.
[2] 刘晓红.宪政视野下高考加分政策的教育"公平"之辩[J].现代教育管理,2011(2):25-27.
[3] 中华人民共和国教育部. 2012年全国教育事业发展统计公报.教育部门户网站:http://www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_1485/201308/xxgk_155798.html. 2013-08-16.
[4] 李霞,刘家壮,戎晓霞.高等教育最优投资双层规划模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(5):102-106.
[5] Li Chunling,Social and Political Changes and Inequality in Educational Opportunities: On the Impact of Family Background and Institutional Factors on Educational Attainment (1940-2001)[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2003,4:62-79.
[6] Li Yu,Lin Hong,Institutional Change and the Generative Mechanisms of Educational Inequality: Educational Attainment for Urban Children in China (1966-2003)[J]. Social Sciences in China,2007,1:72-81.
[7] 龙耀海.关于我国高考民族加分政策的思考[J].民族论坛,2010(9):I0010-I0011.
[8] 甲任,黄辛建.少数民族高考加分制度的历史合理性——以少数民族科举照顾政策为视角[J].前沿,2011(23):224-226.
[9] 肖伟颜.高考加分政策该不该取消[J].大观周刊,2012(6):278.
[10] 乔一.浅析新时期我国少数民族高考加分政策的公正性[J].时代报告(下半月),2012(6):142.
[11] 宗玉蓉,田园,陈敏华.少数民族学生高考加分政策存在的问题及对策[J].江苏高教,2010(1):152-153.
[12] 何晓知.我国高考加分政策的问题与建言[J].求索,2011(5):174-176.
[13] 崔华华,方美.对我国高考加分政策的理性分析及思考[J].高教探索,2010(3):82-86.
[14] 田恒平.加分:一项让人爱恨交加的高考政策[J].齐鲁学刊,2010(5):100-104.
[15] 颜色盛,李美霞.分省录取模式下高考少数民族加分政策探析[J].中国考试,2012(7):54-59.
[16] 张玲.对少数民族考生高考加分政策的思考——积极的视角[J].中国考试,2012(7):60-64.
[17] 舒海兵,叶五一,李熠熠,缪柏其.非实验数据政策效应评估理论与实证研究方法[J].中国管理科学,2007(6):140-148.
[18] James E. Anderson,Public Policy—Making[M]. OLrlando,Florida:holt,Rinehart and Winston,Inc. 1984:84.
[19] 王巍.基于科学发展观的政府领导绩效评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2006(z1):546-550.
[20] 王国顺,张仕璟.基于问卷调查的企业文化测量模型改进及实证分析[J].中国管理科学,2005(z1):605-610.
[21] 杨文国,黄钧,池宏,祁明亮.信息缺失下的应急方案选择模型及算法研究[J].中国管理科学,2007(z1):729-732.
[22] 黄逸宇.从美国实践看高等教育权利的平等化[J].凤凰周刊,2010(33).
[23] 段拉卡.高考加分:规范胜于取消[J].教育与职业,2012(16):3.
[24] 王升云.坚持和完善高考少数民族加分政策[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012,32(1):22-27.
[25] 冯菊香,郝琦.高考加分政策对西部教育发展的负效应[J].探索与争鸣,2009(8):64-66.
[26] 金东海,王爱兰.关于我国少数民族学生高考优惠招生政策若干问题的思考[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2007,44(1):84-88.
[27] 何龙."高考加分很公平"是一种错位判断.羊城晚报(A2版),2011-9-23.