The integration evaluation between industrialization and informatization in China

Abstract

Abstract: Firstly, the definition of integration degree between industrialization and informatization and the definition of integration efficiency between industrialization and informatization are proposed according to the real situation in China. Secondly, an evaluation model for the integration degree between industrialization and informatization is constructed; based on synergy degree evaluation model, the integration degree in China during the period of 2003-2010 is evaluated. Thirdly, according to the definition of integration efficiency between industrialization and informatization, a total factor evaluation index system for integration efficiency is established from the aspects of input and output, and a benevolent Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model is used to evaluate the integration efficiency between industrialization and informatization in China during the period of 1997-2010. The results show that the integration degree has been increased, however the integration efficiency has been decreased, and the phenomenon that the integration is "big but not strong, more many but not better" is prominent. Finally, some decision-making suggestions for China on the integration development between industrialization and informatization are proposed.

Key words: industrialization and informatization, integration degree, integration efficiency, evaluation

CLC Number:

F423

Zhang Yilong, Cui Qiang. The integration evaluation between industrialization and informatization in China[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, (4): 43-49.

References

[1] Englmaier F, Reisinger M. Information, Coordination and the Industrialization of Countries [J]. CESifo Economic Studies, 2008, 54(3):534-550.
[2] Schroth C. The Internet of Services: Global Industrialization of Information Intensive Services [C]. International Conference on Digital Information Management, 2007, 2:635-642.
[3] 夏波涌,张克平. 信息化与工业化融合内容初探 [J]. 制造业自动化,2009, 31(5):1-4.
[4] 徐盈之,孙剑. 信息产业与制造业的融合—基于绩效分析的研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2009(7):56-66.
[5] 张新, 马建华, 刘培德, 刘强, 徐峰. 区域两化融合水平的评价方法及应用[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2012, 47(3):71-76.
[6] 谢康, 李礼, 潭艾婷. 信息化与工业化融合、技术效率与趋同[J]. 管理评论, 2009, 21(10):3-12.
[7] 谢康, 肖静华, 周先波, 乌家培. 中国工业化与信息化融合质量: 理论与实证[J]. 经济研究, 2012(1):4-16.
[8] 王晰巍, 靖继鹏, 刘铎, 马思思. 信息化与工业化融合的关键要素及实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(8):68-72.
[9] 俞立平, 潘云涛, 武夷山. 工业化与信息化互动关系的实证研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2009(1):34-40.
[10] 卢巧玲. 新型工业化道路:工业化与信息化的互动发展[J]. 学术交流, 2004(12):50-53.
[11] 孟庆松, 韩文秀.复合系统协调度模型研究[J]. 天津大学学报, 2000(7):444-446.
[12] 杨锋,夏琼,梁樑.同时考虑决策单元竞争和合作关系的DEA交叉效率评价方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2011(31):92-98
[13] Cooper W W, Seiford L M, Zhu J. Data Envelopment Analysis: History, Models, and Interpretations [J].Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, 2011, 164:1-39.
[14] Hsieh M H, Yu C M, Yu V L, Chow J W. Synergy assessed by checkboard a critical analysis[J]. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1993, 16(4):343-349.
[15] Rothman K J. Synergy and Antagonism in Cause-Effect Relationship[J]. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1974, 99(6):385-388.
[16] 侯光文. 陕西信息化与工业化融合发展路径探讨[J]. 西安邮电学院学报, 2010, 15(6):19-21.
[17] 陶长琪, 齐亚伟. 融合背景下信息产业技术创新与产业系统成长的协同机制[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2009(11):86-93.
[18] 乌家培. 正确处理信息化与工业化的关系[J]. 经济研究, 1993(12):70-71.
[19] 谢康, 肖静华, 乌家培.中国工业化与信息化融合的环境、基础和道路[J]. 经济学动态, 2009(2):28-31.
[20] 张鸿, 许心. 我国信息化与工业化融合的发展战略研究[J]. 西安邮电学院学报, 2010, 15(6):8-13.