The evolution of spatial polarization between strongnational hi-tech zones and weak national hi-tech zones

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the data of national hi-tech zones between the years of 2000 and 2008, the comprehensive strength index of national hi-tech zones is constructed, and then their polarization level and spatial direction are measured by the polarization index. The study results show that the overall polarization tendency of national hi-tech zone presents characteristics of "M" style in the past six years, and the level strengthens in south-north dimension, weakens in developed cities-less developed cities dimension and in coastal-inland dimension; and the average polarization level in developed cities-less developed cities dimension is strongest, however, the average polarization level in south-north dimension is the weakest. According to the empirical results, cities of Beijing, Xian, Tianjin, Wuhan, Chengdu, Dalian, Changchun, and Shenyang are deduced as the selective regions of balanced policy from national hi-tech zones, at last, some suggestions are put forward accordingly.

Key words: national hi-tech zone, spatial polarization, balanced policy

CLC Number:

F207

Wang Song, Hu Shuhua. The evolution of spatial polarization between strongnational hi-tech zones and weak national hi-tech zones[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(3): 121-127.

References

[1] 李永周,姚婳,桂彬.网络组织的知识流动结构与高新区集聚创新机理[J].中国软科学,2009(5):89-95. [2] 安士伟,贾学锋.我国高新区空间布局研究[J].科技进步与对策,2004(7):144-145. [3] shujie yao, liwei zhu. Understanding Income Inequality in China: A Multi-Angle Perspective[J].Economics of Planning,1998(31):133-150. [4] Jinjun Xue. Urban-Rural Income Disparity and Its Significance in China[J].Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics,1997(38):45-59. [5] Ottaviano G, Puga D. Agglomeration in the Global Economy a Survey of the New Economic Geography[J].Word Economy, 1998,21(6):707-731. [6] Puga D. The Rise and Fall of Regional Inequality[J].European Economic Review, 1999(43):303-334. [7] 韩伯棠,李强,朱美光等.基于熵理论的高新区发展不均衡度评价[J].科学学研究,2005,23(3):342-346. [8] 黄宁燕,梁战平.我国高新技术产业开发区的发展状况及趋势[J].科学学研究,1999,17(2):79-87. [9] 刘荣增.我国高新技术产业开发区发展态势评价[J].科技进步与对策,2002(11):27-29. [10] 何坤.中国高新技术产业开发区发展布局研究[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,24(3):28-31. [11] 黄春玲,余颖,黄卓.国家高新区产出效率的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005, 26(2):100-103. [12] 韩伯棠.我国高新技术产业园区的现状及二次创业研究[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2007. [13] 徐陈生.基于DEA我国高新区相对效率评价[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(8):117-119. [14] 权进民,姚兰,史本山.基于DEA 的国家级高新区可持续发展能力评价[J].软科学,2008,22(1):75-77. [15] 张芮,赵丽,杨洪焦.区域经济差异测量方法述评[J].统计与决策,2008(4):50-53. [16] ESTEBAN J, RAY D. On the Measurement of Polarization[J].Econo-metrica,1994, 62:819-851. [17] WOLFSON M C. When Inequalities Diverge[J].American Economic Review,1994, 84:353-358. [18] ZHANG X, KANBUR R. What Difference Do Polarization measures Make? An Application to China[J].Journal of Development Studies,2001,37:85-98. [19] TSUI K, WANG Y. Polarization Ordering and New Classes of Polarization Indices .Memo: The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1998.