The effectiveness improving mechanism for the management innovation:From the perspective of organizational ambidexterity

PDF(1528 KB)

Science Research Management ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2) : 1-10.

Lin Haifen, Su Jingqin

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The coexisting mechanism of the two major learning styles, i.e., exploration leaning and exploitation leaning in management innovation process from both time and space dimensions, namely, ambidexterity is attempted to explore. And the result indicates that the phenomenon of ambidexterity exists in both dimensions: time ambidexterity is characterized by alternative existence of the two learning styles, while space ambidexterity means exploration and exploitation might exist simultaneously. The case involving efficiency management in Jiangxi China Mobile has been adopted to explain and examine the rationality and reliability of these two kinds of ambidexterity. Therefore, the establishment of ambidextrous organization by creating organization context and improving effectiveness of top management team based on dual structures would be an essential way for improving management innovation effectiveness, with the aim of deep study on the promotion of effectiveness mechanism based on organization learning.

Key words

management innovation / exploration learning / exploitation learning / ambidextrous organization

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Lin Haifen, Su Jingqin. The effectiveness improving mechanism for the management innovation:From the perspective of organizational ambidexterity[J]. Science Research Management. 2012, 33(2): 1-10

References

[1] Birkinshaw, J., Hamel Cary, & Mol. Management Innovation[J]. Academy of Management Review 2008, 33(4): 825-845. [2] Stata, R. Organizational Learning-The Key to Management Innovation[J]. Sloan Management Review,1989 ,63(1):63-73. [3] Hamel G. The why, what and how of management innovation[J]. Harvard Business Review 2006,84 (2): 72-84. [4] Guillen M.F. Models of management: work, authority, and organization in a comparative perspective[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1994. [5] Birkinshaw, J., & Mol, M. How management innovation happens[J]. Sloan Management Review, 2006,47(4): 81-88. [6] Armbruster H., A. Bikfalvi, S. Kinkel, G. Lay. Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys[J]. Technovation, 2008,28(10): 644-657. [7] Naveh E., Meilich O., Marcus A. The effects of administrative innovation implementation on performance: an organizational learning approach[J]. Strategic Organization, 2006,4(3): 275-302. [8] Barker, J. The discipline of teamwork: Participation and concertive control[M]. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage, 1999. [9] 李燚.管理创新中的组织学习[M].北京:经济管理出版社, 2007. [10] March J.G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87. [11] Baum, J. A. C., Li, S. X., & Usher, J. M. Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains' acquisitions[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000,45(4): 766-801. [12] Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(3): 238-256. [13] He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science, 2004,15(4): 481-494. [14] Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. Learning through acquisitions[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001,44(3): 457-476. [15] Duncan, R. B. Duncan, R. 1976. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation . In R. H. Killman, L. R. Pondy, & D. Sleven (Eds.), The management of organization, 1976,1: 167-188. New York: North Holland. [16] Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal[M]. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press,1997. [17] O'Reilly,C A,and Tushman,M L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma[J]. Research on Organizational Behavior, 2008,28(1):185-206. [18] Brady, T, & Davies, A. Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning[J]. Organization Studies, 2004, 25(9): 1601-1621. [19] Zahra, S., G. George. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad[J]. Management Review, 2002,27(2):185-203. [20] 林海芬,苏敬勤.管理创新过程效力提升机理探析:基于知识治理视角[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(8):1-6. [21] Nickerson, J. A., T. R. Zenger. Being efficiently fickle:A dynamic theory of organizational choice[J]. Organization Science, 2002, 13(5) 547-566. [22] Siggelkow, N., D. A. Levinthal. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation[J]. Organization Science,2003 14(6):650-669. [23] Zollo, M. and S. G. Winterm. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities[J], Organization Science, 2002,13( 3):339-353. [24] Meyer, A. D. and J. B. Goes. Organizational Assimilation of Innovation: A Multilevel Contextual Analysis[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1988,31(4): 897-923. [25] 苏敬勤,林海芬. 引进型管理创新过程机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010, 31(1): 34-41. [26] Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: effects of environment, organization and top managers[J]. British Journal of Management, 2006,17(3):215-236. [27] Gibson, C. B. and Birkinshaw, J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004,47(2):209-226. [28] Levinthal, D. A. and March, J. G. The myopia of learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993,14(8):95-112. [29] Tushman, M. L. and O'Reilly, C. A. Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change[J]. California Management Review, 1996,38(4):8-29. [30] 周俊,薛求知. 双元型组织构建研究前沿探析[J]. 外国经济与管理,2009,31(1):50-57. [31] Gilbert, C. G. Unbundling the structure of inertia: resource versus routine rigidity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005,48(5):741-763. [32] Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994,15(5): 91-112. [33] Mackie, D. M. and Goethals, G. R. Individual and group goals . In Hendrick, C. (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1987:144-166. [34] Simons, T., Hope Pelled, L. and Smith, K. A. Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1999,42(6): 662-673. [35] Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O'Bannon, D. P. and Scully, J. A. Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994,39(3):412-438. [36] Michel, J. G. and Hambrick, D. C. Diversification posture and top management team characteristics[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1992,35(1): 9-37. [37] Siegel, P. A. and Hambrick, D. C. Pay disparities within top management groups: evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms[J]. Organization Science, 2005,16(3):259-274. [38] Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, & Tushman, M. Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance[J], Organization Science, 2009,20(4): 685-695.