PDF(1166 KB)
Research on the impact of foreign institutional investors' shareholding on the ESG performance of firms
Li Xiaochong, Wang Jing, Huang Yin, Zhang Na
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3) : 156-165.
PDF(1166 KB)
PDF(1166 KB)
Research on the impact of foreign institutional investors' shareholding on the ESG performance of firms
As the capital market is gradually opening up,foreign institutional investors will impose higher requirements for the ESG performance of firms based on the international ESG standards and shareholding preferences. However,it is still not clear whether it can be a beneficial complementary mechanism for non-rigid ESG institutional environment in China. Therefore,this paper selected Chinese A-share listed firms of Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange from 2009 to 2022 as the sample and examined the influence mechanism of foreign institutional investors' shareholding on the ESG performance of firms with the panel OLS regression with fixed-effects. The paper comprised four conclusions. Firstly,foreign institutional investors' shareholding improves the ESG performance of firms. This conclusion remains robust after the endogeneity and robustness tests. Secondly,foreign institutional investors' shareholding improves the ESG performance through reducing managerial myopia,alleviating financing constraints,and enhancing risk-taking. Thirdly,analyst following,media supervision,and government constraint further enhance the positive effect of foreign institutional investors' shareholding on the ESG performance of firms. Finally,foreign institutional investors' shareholding further promotes exploratory innovation through improving the ESG performance of firms. Considering China's non-rigid ESG institutional environment,the departments concerned should improve the mechanism of China capital market opening and fully play the collaborative promotion effect of external stakeholders including analysts,media,and government,in order to increase the positive governance effect of foreign institutional investors' shareholding on the ESG performance of firms.
foreign institutional investor / ESG performance of firms / exploratory innovation / capital market opening
| [1] |
谢红军, 吕雪. 负责任的国际投资:ESG与中国OFDI[J]. 经济研究, 2022, 57(3):83-99.
|
| [2] |
连立帅, 朱松, 陈关亭. 资本市场开放、非财务信息定价与企业投资:基于沪深港通交易制度的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(8):136-154.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
庄明明, 梁权熙. 境外机构投资者能促进企业投资效率提升吗?[J]. 世界经济研究, 2021(2):102-117.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
沈坤荣, 林剑威, 傅元海. 网络基础设施建设、信息可得性与企业创新边界[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(1):57-75.
|
| [13] |
赵健宇, 廖文琦, 袭希. 创业导向与探索式创新的关系:一个双中介效应模型[J]. 管理科学, 2019, 32(2):33-49.
|
| [14] |
刘柏, 卢家锐, 琚涛. 形式主义还是实质主义:ESG评级软监管下的绿色创新研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(5):16-28.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
万源星, 王怡舒, 刘云. 股票市场开放与企业研发国际化:来自沪深港通的证据[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(5):96-104.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
李沁洋, 何银莹, 刘向强, 等. 资本市场开放对企业融资约束的影响机制研究:基于“沪深港通”的经验证据[J]. 世界经济研究, 2023(4):87-102.
|
| [22] |
庞家任, 张鹤, 张梦洁. 资本市场开放与股权资本成本:基于沪港通、深港通的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020(12):169-188.
|
| [23] |
许志勇, 韩炳. 资产结构错配与企业高质量发展:技术创新与融资约束的中介效应[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2023, 43(10):2881-2907.
|
| [24] |
方先明, 胡丁. 企业ESG表现与创新:来自A股上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(2):13-24.
|
| [25] |
王建玲, 李玥婷, 吴璇. 企业社会责任与风险承担:基于资源依赖理论视角[J]. 预测, 2019, 38(3):45-51.
|
| [26] |
朱炳昇, 田增瑞, 王浩宇, 等. 创业投资对企业可持续发展的影响路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(1):132-142.
|
| [27] |
吕晓军, 胡华夏, 王红建. 资本市场开放与企业创新质量:基于中国企业重数量轻质量的“创新陷阱”视角[J]. 系统管理学报, 2022, 31(5):1018-1027.
|
| [28] |
叶志伟, 张新民, 胡聪慧. 企业为何短贷长投:基于企业战略视角的解释[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(1):29-44.
|
| [29] |
虞义华, 赵奇锋, 鞠晓生. 发明家高管与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(3):136-154.
|
| [30] |
雷雷, 张大永, 姬强. 共同机构持股与企业ESG表现[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(4):133-151.
|
| [31] |
江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5):100-120.
|
| [32] |
刘贝贝, 李春涛. 合格境外机构投资者与公司盈余管理[J]. 管理科学, 2022, 35(2):97-110.
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
杜勇, 娄靖, 胡红燕. 供应链共同股权网络下企业数字化转型同群效应研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(4):136-155.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |