Research on the impact of data factor supply on urban entrepreneurial activeness: A quasi-natural experiment based on open government data

Liu Minghui, Zhang Mengyao, Wei Tianbing

Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3) : 24-33.

PDF(1201 KB)
PDF(1201 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3) : 24-33. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.03.003  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2026.03.003

Research on the impact of data factor supply on urban entrepreneurial activeness: A quasi-natural experiment based on open government data

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Government data opening is a necessary measure for the supply of data factors,and using government data opening to enhance urban entrepreneurial activeness is an important path and embodiment of releasing data dividends. In this paper,government data opening was used as a quasi-natural experiment,and the progressive double-difference method was used to test the impact of data factors supply on urban entrepreneurial activeness. It was found that the supply of data factors represented by government data opening can significantly improve the entrepreneurial activeness in cities. The mechanism analysis showed that government data opening enhances urban entrepreneurial activeness by promoting technological innovation,strengthening talent gathering and improving government administrative efficiency. The heterogeneity analysis showed that the promotion effect of government data opening on urban entrepreneurial activeness is more obvious in cities with higher financial development level,digital economy development level and economic development level,as well as producer services. Further analyses showed that there is a positive correlation between the open quality of government data and the entrepreneurial activeness in cities,and the open government data improves the entrepreneurial quality in cities. This paper will enrich the research on the economic effect of data factor supply and clarify the logical mechanism of government data opening to enhance urban entrepreneurial activeness,and provide theoretical basis and decision-making reference for enhancing the positive effect of government data opening on urban entrepreneurship.

Key words

data factor / open government data / entrepreneurial activeness

Cite this article

Download Citations
Liu Minghui , Zhang Mengyao , Wei Tianbing. Research on the impact of data factor supply on urban entrepreneurial activeness: A quasi-natural experiment based on open government data[J]. Science Research Management. 2026, 47(3): 24-33 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.03.003

References

[1]
叶文平, 李新春, 陈强远. 流动人口对城市创业活跃度的影响:机制与证据[J]. 经济研究, 2018(6):157-170.
YE Wenping, LI Xinchun, CHEN Qiangyuan. How immigrant populations affect city entrepreneurship activity: Mechanism and evidence[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2018(6):157-170.
[2]
黄永春, 姚远虎, 徐军海, 等. 规模扩张还是产品研发?:创业资助对新生企业家创业导向的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(2):296-305.
HUANG Yongchun, YAO Yuanhu, XU Junhai, et al. Scale expansion or product development? The impact of entrepreneurial funding on entrepreneurial orientation of new entrepreneurs[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 38(2):296-305.
[3]
赵涛, 张智, 梁上坤. 数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展:来自中国城市的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(10):65-76.
ZHAO Tao, ZHANG Zhi, LIANG Shangkun. Digital economy, entrepreneurship, and high-quality economic development: Empirical evidence from urban China[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(10):65-76.
[4]
刘翠花. 数字经济对产业结构升级和创业增长的影响[J]. 中国人口科学, 2022(2):112-125+128.
LIU Cuihua. The impact of digital economy on upgrading of industrial structure and entrepreneurial growth[J]. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2022(2):112-125+128.
[5]
谢绚丽, 沈艳, 张皓星, 等. 数字金融能促进创业吗?:来自中国的证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2018, 17(4):1557-1580.
XIE Xuanli, SHEN Yan, ZHANG Haoxing, et al. Can digital finance promote entrepreneurship? Evidence from China[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2018, 17(4):1557-1580.
[6]
韩亮亮, 彭伊, 孟庆娜. 数字普惠金融、创业活跃度与共同富裕:基于我国省际面板数据的经验研究[J]. 软科学, 2023, 37(3):18-24.
HAN Liangliang, PENG Yi, MENG Qingna. Digital inclusive finance, entrepreneurial activity and common wealth: An empirical study based on inter-provincial panel data in China[J]. Soft Science, 2023, 37(3):18-24.
[7]
ROSS P K, BLUMENSTEIN M. Cloud computing as a facilitator of SME entrepreneurship[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2015, 27(1):87-101.
[8]
NAMBISAN S. Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2017, 41(6):1029-1055.
[9]
何雨可, 牛耕, 逯建, 等. 数字治理与城市创业活力:来自“信息惠民国家试点”政策的证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(1):47-66.
HE Yuke, NIU Geng, LU Jian, et al. Digital governance and urban entrepreneurial vitality: Evidence from the “national pilot policy of information benefiting the people” in China[J].Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2024, 41(1):47-66.
[10]
方锦程, 刘颖, 高昊宇, 等. 公共数据开放能否促进区域协调发展?:来自政府数据平台上线的准自然实验[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(9):124-142.
FANG Jincheng, LIU Ying, GAO Haoyu, et al. Does public data access promote regional harmonious development? On a quasi-natural experiment of government data platform access[J]. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(9):124-142.
[11]
陈艳利, 蒋琪. 数据生产要素视角下开放公共数据与企业创新:基于建立公共数据开放平台的准自然实验[J]. 经济管理, 2024, 46(1):25-46.
CHEN Yanli, JIANG Qi. Open public data and enterprise innovation from the perspective of data production factors: A quasi-natural experiment of establishing an open platform for public data[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2024, 46(1):25-46.
[12]
彭远怀. 政府数据开放的价值创造作用:企业全要素生产率视角[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(9):50-70.
PENG Yuanhuai. The value creation role of open government data: The perspective of firm's total factor productivity[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2023, 40(9):50-70.
[13]
吴武清, 李祁恒, 章柳漪, 等. 公共数据资源与企业全要素生产率:基于地方政府数据开放的准自然实验[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2024, 44(6):1815-1833.
WU Wuqing, LI Qiheng, ZHANG Liuyi, et al. Public data resources and total factor productivity of enterprises: A quasi-natural experiment based on local government data opening[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2024, 44(6):1815-1833.
[14]
欧阳伊玲, 王愉靖, 李平, 等. 数据要素与城投债定价:基于公共数据开放的准自然实验[J]. 世界经济, 2024, 47(2):174-203.
OUYANG Yiling, WANG Yujing, LI Ping, et al. Data factors and pricing chengtou bonds: A quasi-natural experiment based on open government data[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2024, 47(2):174-203.
[15]
SHANE S, VENKATARAMAN S. Guest editors' introduction to the special issue on technology entrepreneurship[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(2):181-184.
[16]
RIPPA P, SECUNDO G. Digital academic entrepreneurship: The potential of digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 146:900-911.
[17]
李涛, 朱俊兵, 伏霖. 聪明人更愿意创业吗?:来自中国的经验发现[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(3):91-105.
LI Tao, ZHU Junbing, FU Lin. Are the smart more willing to be entrepreneurs? Empirical evidence from China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2017, 52(3):91-105.
[18]
周文义, 陶一桃. 智慧城市建设能提升创业水平吗?:基于双重差分模型的检验[J]. 统计研究, 2023, 40(8):122-134.
ZHOU Wenyi, TAO Yitao. Can the construction of smart cities improve the level of entrepreneurship: A test based on difference-in-difference model[J]. Statistical Research, 2023, 40(8):122-134.
[19]
白俊红, 张艺璇, 卞元超. 创新驱动政策是否提升城市创业活跃度:来自国家创新型城市试点政策的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(6):61-78.
BAI Junhong, ZHANG Yixuan, BIAN Yuanchao. Does innovation-driven policy increase entrepreneurial activity in cities: Evidence from the national innovative city pilot policy[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(6):61-78.
[20]
何凌云, 马青山. 智慧城市试点能否提升城市创新水平?:基于多期DID的经验证据[J]. 财贸研究, 2021, 32(3):28-40.
HE Lingyun, MA Qingshan. Can smart city pilots promote level of urban innovation? Empirical evidence based on multi-period DID[J].Finance and Trade Research, 2021, 32(3):28-40.
[21]
黄亮雄, 孙湘湘, 王贤彬. 反腐败与地区创业:效应与影响机制[J]. 经济管理, 2019, 41(9):5-19.
HUANG Liangxiong, SUN Xiangxiang, WANG Xianbin. Anti-corruption and regional entrepreneurship: Effects and mechanisms of influence[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2019, 41(9):5-19.
[22]
赖敏, 余泳泽, 刘大勇, 等. 制度环境、政府效能与“大众创业万众创新”:来自跨国经验证据[J]. 南开经济研究, 2018(1):19-33.
LAI Min, YU Yongze, LIU Dayong, et al. Institutional environment, government efficiency and activity of entrepreneurship and innovation: Evidence from cross-border experience[J]. Nankai Economic Studies, 2018(1):19-33.
[23]
张柳钦, 李建生, 孙伟增. 制度创新、营商环境与城市创业活力:来自中国自由贸易试验区的证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(10):93-114.
ZHANG Liuqin, LI Jiansheng, SUN Weizeng. Institutional innovation, business environment and entrepreneurial vitality: Evidence from the China pilot free trade zone[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2023, 40(10):93-114.
[24]
BECK T, LEVINE R, LEVKOV A. Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(5): 1637-1667.
[25]
GOODMAN-BACON A. Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2021, 225(2): 254-277.
[26]
GARDNER J. Two-stage differences in differences[J]. arxiv preprint arxiv:2207.05943, 2022.
[27]
江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5):100-120.
JIANG Ting. Mediating effects and moderating effects in causal inference[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(5):100-120.
[28]
张所地, 闫昱洁, 李斌. 城市基础设施、人才集聚与创新[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(2):7-13.
ZHANG Suodi, YAN Minjie, LI Bin. Urban infrastructure, talent agglomeration and innovation[J]. Soft Science, 2021, 35(2):7-13.
[29]
刘军, 杨渊鋆, 张三峰. 中国数字经济测度与驱动因素研究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2020(6):81-96.
LIU Jun, YANG Yuanyun, ZHANG Sanfeng. Research on the measurement and driving factors of China's digital economy[J]. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2020(6):81-96.
PDF(1201 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/