Research on the configurations for the development of new quality productive forces driven by technological innovation in strategic emerging industries

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.05.003

Abstract

Abstract: Cultivating new quality productive forces serves as an inherent requirement and central focus in driving premium-grade societal progress. Technological innovation in strategic emerging industries plays a significant role in driving the development of new quality productive forces. However, existing literature remains insufficient in exploring the specific driving mechanisms. Based on the TOE (Technology-Organization-Environment) framework, this study employed the NCA (Necessary Condition Analysis) and dynamic QCA (Qualitative Comparative Analysis) methods to analyze the panel data from 30 provincial-level regions in China from 2011 to 2021, investigating the configurational pathways of new quality productive forces formed through the interaction of technological, organizational and environmental factors of technological innovation in strategic emerging industries. The research findings revealed that: First, the single factor of technological innovation is insufficient to constitute necessary conditions for driving the development of new quality productive forces; Second, there are three configurational pathways have been identified for realizing high-level development of new quality productive forces: the technology-intellectual property protection synergy model, the technology-organization dual synergy model, and the technology-organization-environment multiple synergy model, with technological elements consistently serving as core conditions across all pathways; Third, the configurational pathways driving the development of new quality productive forces exhibit certain spatiotemporal variation patterns. Temporally, multiple pathways demonstrate sequential stability with gradually increasing explanatory power; Spatially, the within-group coverage of some pathways shows regional variations. The conclusions of this study will contribute to deepening the understanding of the complex mechanisms underlying the formation pathways of new quality productive forces in China, and provide theoretical foundations and practical guidance for developing new quality productive forces tailored to local conditions.

Key words: new quality productive force, strategic emerging industry, technological innovation, TOE theory, dynamic QCA

Tian Qingfeng, Yi Lei. Research on the configurations for the development of new quality productive forces driven by technological innovation in strategic emerging industries[J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(5): 23-34.

References

[1]周文, 许凌云.再论新质生产力:认识误区、形成条件与实现路径[J].改革, 2024, 无(无):1-12
[2]习近平主持召开新时代推动东北全面振兴座谈会强调牢牢把握东北的重要使命奋力谱写东北全面振兴新篇章[N].人民日报, 2023-09-10(1).
[3]王飞, 韩晓媛, 陈瑞华.新质生产力赋能现代化产业体系：内在逻辑与实现路径[J].当代经济管理, 2024, 无(无):1-9
[4]张林, 蒲清平.新质生产力的内涵特征、理论创新与价值意蕴[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版, 2023, 29(6):137-148
[5]蒋永穆, 乔张媛.新质生产力：逻辑、内涵及路径[J].社会科学研究, 2024, 211(1):10-18
[6]谭志雄, 穆思颖, 韩经纬, 等.新质生产力推动全球价值链攀升：理论逻辑与现实路径[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版, 2024, 无(无):1-12
[7]ROMER P M.Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization[J].The American Economic Review, 1987, 77(2):56-62
[8]何兴邦.技术创新与经济增长质量——基于省际面板数据的实证分析[J].中国科技论坛, 2019, 58(10):24-32
[9]宋洋.数字经济、技术创新与经济高质量发展:基于省级面板数据[J].贵州社会科学, 2020, 无(12):105-112
[10]SOETE L, FREEMAN C.The economics of industrial innovation[M]. routledge, 2012.
[11]PENEDER M.Structural change and aggregate growth[J].Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2002, 14(4):427-448
[12]焦方义, 张东超.发展战略性新兴产业与未来产业加快形成新质生产力的机理研究[J].湖南科技大学学报社会科学版, 2024, 27(1):110-116
[13]杜传忠, 李钰葳.强化科技创新能力加快形成新质生产力的机理研究[J].湖南科技大学学报社会科学版, 2024, 27(1):100-109
[14]钟茂初.新质生产力”发展演进及其增长路径的理论阐释[J].河北学刊, 2024, 44(2):151-157
[15]李晓华.新质生产力发展的全新赛道——兼论颠覆性创新的推动作用[J].国家治理, 2024, 无(1):34-38
[16]邬金鸣, 胡智杰, 姚茹, 等.面向技术创新过程表征和描述的技术要素关联概念模型[J].图书情报工作, 2024, 无(无):1-15
[17]TORNATZKY L G, FLEISCHER M.The Process of Technological Innovation[M]. United States: Lexington Books, 1990.
[18]王雪原, 李雪琪.技术-组织-环境框架下数字化政策组合研究[J].科学学研究, 2022, 40(5):841-851
[19]DOSI G.Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change[J].Research policy, 1982, 11(3):147-162
[20]BUSH V.Science, the endless frontier[M]. Princeton University Press, 2020.
[21]战略性新兴技术研究导论[M].北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
[22]周文, 许凌云.论新质生产力：内涵特征与重要着力点[J].改革, 2023, 无(10):1-13
[23]郭彦彦, 吴福象.基于TRIZ的中国关键技术突破路径研究——一个系统框架[J].科技进步与对策, 2024, 无(无):1-10
[24]王欣.框架下高技术产业科技成果转化组态研究[J].科研管理, 2023, 无(无):1-10
[25]赵晓旻.新兴技术向战略性新兴产业演化的模式与路径研究——以初创企业为例[D]. 电子科技大学, 2023.
[26]王珏, 祝继高.劳动保护能促进企业高学历员工的创新吗?——基于股上市公司的实证研究[J].管理世界, 2018, 34(3):139-152
[27]肖峰, 赫军营.新质生产力：智能时代生产力发展的新向度[J].南昌大学学报人文社会科学版, 2023, 54(6):37-44
[28]黄送钦, 禹心郭, 吕鹏.平台的力量：设立研发平台能促进企业创新吗[J].经济管理, 2023, 45(2):80-97
[29]谷静.知识产权保护、数字经济与企业颠覆性技术创新[J].技术经济与管理研究, 2023, 无(9):12-17
[30]李黎明, 刘海波.知识产权保护是否影响了我国高技术产业的发展转型[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2014, 35(9):3-13
[31]杜运周, 贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析:管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界, 2017, 无(6):155-167
[32]LUCAS S R, SZATROWSKI A.Qualitative comparative analysis in critical perspective[J].Sociological Methodology, 2014, 44(1):1-79
[33]GARCIA-CASTRO R, ARI?O M A.A general approach to panel data set-theoretic research[J].Journal of Advances in Management Sciences & Information Systems, 2016, 526(2):63-76
[34]杜运周, 李佳馨, 刘秋辰, 等.复杂动态视角下的组态理论与方法：研究进展与未来方向[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(3):180-197
[35]王珏, 王荣基.新质生产力：指标构建与时空演进[J].西安财经大学学报, 2024, 37(1):31-47
[36]袁小钦.基于TOE理论的我国高技术产业高质量发展组态路径研究[D]. 哈尔滨理工大学, 2024.
[37]李佳, 王丽丽, 王欢明.产业持续创新发展水平评价研究——以新一代信息技术产业为例[J].科学决策, 2021, 无(3):62-82
[38]李佳, 王丽丽, 王欢明.不同经济发展水平下创新要素对产业创新绩效的影响及政策启示[J].科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(7):52-58
[39]陈鲁夫, 邵云飞.钻石模型”视角下战略性新兴产业创新绩效影响因素的实证研究——以新一代信息产业为例[J].技术经济, 2017, 36(2):1-7
[40]等.UK evidence for the determinants of R&D intensity from a panel fsQCA[J].Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(11):5431-5436
[41]杜运周, 刘秋辰, 程建青.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度？——基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(9):141-155
[42]FISS P C.Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of management journal, 2011, 54(2):393-420
[43]SCHNEIDER C Q, WAGEMANN C.Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
[44]RAGIN C C.Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond[M]. University of Chicago Press, 2009.
[45]王海南, 王礼恒, 周志成, 等.四链”深度融合下战略性新兴产业高质量发展战略研究[J].中国工程科学, 2024, 26(1):1-12
[46]蒙克, 魏必.反思QCA方法的“时间盲区”：为公共管理研究找回“时间”[J].中国行政管理, 2023, 无(1):96-104
[47]张放.影响地方政府信息公开的因素——基于省域面板数据的动态分析[J].情报杂志, 2023, 42(1):133-141
[48]KRAUS S, RIBEIRO-SORIANO D, SCHüSSLER M.Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research–the rise of a method[J].International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2018, 14(无):15-33

Research on the configurations for the development of new quality productive forces driven by technological innovation in strategic emerging industries

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Wu Dong, Li Jingwen, Wu Xiaobo. A study on the impacts of strategic deviation on firms′ new quality productive forces [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(4): 11-20.
[2]	Zeng Xianju, Shi Qing. The generation mechanism of new quality productive forces: A case study of Shenzhen′s new energy vehicle industry [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(4): 63-71.
[3]	Chen Kaiming, Huang Qinghua, Shi Peihao. The emergence of enterprises′ new quality productive forces driven by artificial intelligence applications: The micro-evidence from Chinese-listed companies [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(4): 34-43.
[4]	Wu Bao, Chen Feng. Research on the impact of ESG activism on green total factor productivity: A study from the perspective of new quality productive forces [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(3): 150-159.
[5]	Chen Yufen, Yang Shuangshuang, Hu Sihui. Construction and measurement of the evaluation index system of new quality productive forces: A study based on the perspective of ‘input-process-output’ [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 1-11.
[6]	Liang Xiaocheng, Lyu Kangyin, Chen Si. Research on the influence of marketization of data elements on the level of new quality productive forces of enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 12-21.
[7]	Guo Yuanyuan, Chen Yilang, Chi Renyong. Research on the system structure for development of new quality productive forces in traditional industry clusters empowered by industrial platforms [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 22-31.
[8]	Yin Ximing, Wu Peiqi, Qian Yating, Liu Xielin. The empowerment of new quality productive forces by the human-machine-context collaboration: Its paradigm logic and practical approaches [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 43-52.
[9]	Chen Yan, Hou Yuqi, Ma Xin, Xu Bin. Research on the path and mechanism for the high-quality development of enterprises empowered by intelligent transformation: A study based on the perspective of developing new quality productive forces [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 32-42.
[10]	Zhou Jianping, Xu Weixiang, Guo Jiaxin. Research on the impact of urban knowledge innovation network on the formation of new quality productive forces [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 53-63.
[11]	Ge Jing, Zhao Liyi, Ge Baoshan. Research on the impact of R&D intensity on the technological Research on the impact of R&D intensity on the technological innovation capability of SRDI enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(1): 134-144.
[12]	Zhang Yi, Jiao Feifei, Wang Xianjia. Research on evaluation of the technological innovation efficiency of the semiconductor industry in China:Some empirical evidence from A-share listed companies [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(9): 11-20.
[13]	Deng Yue, Jiang Wanyi, Cao Guoxian. Research on technological innovation and catch-up from exogeneity to endogeneity:Based on the analysis of the development of waste-to-energy(WTE) technology in China [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(8): 164-171.
[14]	Lin Yan, Li Menghan, Zhang Zenan. A study on the effect and mechanism of the strategic investors on enterprises′ green technology innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(7): 79-89.
[15]	Wu Qun, Han Tianran, Jiang Nan. Research on the technological innovation collaboration of digitalization with patent-intensive industries [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(7): 101-109.