Research on the path and mechanism for the high-quality development of enterprises empowered by intelligent transformation: A study based on the perspective of developing new quality productive forces

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.02.004

Abstract

Abstract: The proposal of the new quality productive force theory provides significant guidance for transforming traditional economic growth models and promoting high-quality development. Accelerating the intelligent transformation of enterprises is not only the main driving force for creation of new quality productive forces, but also the only way to achieve high-quality development. Based on this, this paper studied the empowering path of intelligent transformation from the perspective of developing new quality productive forces, and selected the data of A-share listed manufacturing enterprises from 2012 to 2022 as samples to analyze the impact of intelligent transformation on new quality productive forces and high-quality development. The study revealed the following findings: (1) Intelligent transformation significantly promotes high-quality development, exhibiting a clear linear relationship. (2) The mechanism tests showed that new quality productive forces serve as a mediating mechanism between intelligent transformation and high-quality development. (3) The threshold effect analysis identified a double-threshold effect of R&D investment on intelligent transformation and high-quality development. (4) The regional heterogeneity test demonstrated that intelligent transformation in central cities significantly enhances labor skill improvement, while its impact in non-central cities is limited. (5) The heterogeneity analysis of enterprises found that intelligent transformation in the technology-intensive firms significantly enhances tangible labor resources, whereas its impact is negligible in the asset-intensive and labor-intensive firms. This paper has combined the Marxist productivity theory with the theory of production factors under the category of economics, and it will provide scientific basis for promoting new quality productive forces and achieving high-quality development.

Key words: intelligent transformation, new quality productive force, innovative allocation of production factors, high-quality development

Chen Yan, Hou Yuqi, Ma Xin, Xu Bin. Research on the path and mechanism for the high-quality development of enterprises empowered by intelligent transformation: A study based on the perspective of developing new quality productive forces[J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 32-42.

References

[1]Zhou Y, Zang J, Miao Z, et al.Upgrading pathways of intelligent manufacturing in China: Transitioning across technological paradigms[J].Engineering, 2019, 5(4):691-701
[2]杜传忠, 疏爽, 李泽浩.新质生产力促进经济高质量发展的机制分析与实现路径[J].经济纵横, 2023, (12):20-28
[3]张树山, 董旭达.智能化转型、组织韧性与制造业企业高质量发展[J].中国流通经济, 2024, 38(01):104-114
[4]韩永辉, 刘洋.少子老龄化、工业智能化与宏观经济波动——基于内生经济增长理论的模型分析[J].管理世界, 2024, 40(01):20-37
[5]张万里, 宣旸, 张澄等.智能化能否提升企业全要素生产率和技术创新[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(12):107-116
[6]蔡跃洲, 陈楠.新技术革命下人工智能与高质量增长、高质量就业[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(05):3-22
[7]刘建丽, 李娇.智能制造：概念演化、体系解构与高质量发展[J].改革, 2024, (02):75-88
[8]Kogan L, Papanikolaou D.Growth opportunities,technology shocks,and asset prices[J].The journal of finance, 2014, 69(2):675-718
[9]OLSEN T L, TOMLIN B.Industry 40:opportunities and challenges for operationsmanagement[J].Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2020, 22(1):113-122
[10]Min H.Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: theory and applications[J].International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 2010, 13(1):13-39
[11]Ilmudeen A, Bao Y, Alharbi I M.How does business-IT strategic alignment dimension impact on organizational performance measures: Conjecture and empirical analysis[J].Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 2019, 32(3):457-476
[12]陈岩, 徐玢.智能服务、生产要素替代机制与绿色转型——基于中国制造业上市公司的实证研究[J].暨南学报哲学社会科学版, 2023, 45(04):89-103
[13]Santos D B O M, Carlos A B, Souza D T P N.Robotic process automation and artificial intelligence capabilities driving digital strategy: a resource-based view[J].Business Process Management Journal, 2024, 30(1):105-134
[14]李雪松, 党琳, 赵宸宇.数字化转型、融入全球创新网络与创新绩效[J].中国工业经济, 2022, (10):43-61
[15]韩峰, 姜竹青.集聚网络视角下企业数字化的生产率提升效应研究[J].管理世界, 2023, 39(11):54-77
[16]翟绪权, 夏鑫雨.数字经济加快形成新质生产力的机制构成与实践路径[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(01):44-55+168-169.
[17]习近平经济思想研究中心.新质生产力的内涵特征和发展重点[N]. 人民日报, 2024-03-01(009).
[18]Park H J, Choi S O.Digital innovation adoption and its economic impact focused on path analysis at national level[J].Journal of open innovation: Technology, market, and complexity, 2019, 5(3):56-
[19]袁淳, 肖土盛, 耿春晓等.数字化转型与企业分工：专业化还是纵向一体化[J].中国工业经济, 2021, (09):137-155
[20]黄勃, 李海彤, 刘俊岐等.数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展——来自企业数字专利的证据[J].经济研究, 2023, 58(03):97-115
[21]Porter M E, Heppelmann J E.How Smart,Connected Products Are Transforming Companies[J].Harvard Business Review, 2015, 93(10):96-114
[22]周文, 许凌云.论新质生产力：内涵特征与重要着力点[J].改革, 2023, (10):1-13
[23]曾晶, 余泳泽, 缪言.数据要素对劳动和资本的配置效应：机理分析与实证检验[J].中南财经政法大学学报, 2024, (01):148-160
[24]孟凡生, 赵艳.智能化发展与颠覆性创新[J].科学学研究, 2022, 40(11):2077-2092
[25]江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济, 2022, (5):100-120
[26]李万利, 刘虎春, 龙志能等.企业数字化转型与供应链地理分布[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(08):90-110
[27]李婉红, 李娜.绿色技术创新、智能化转型与制造企业环境绩效--基于门槛效应的实证研究[J].管理评论, 2023, (5):1-11
[28]吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍，等.企业数字化转型与资本市场表现---来自股票流动性的经验证据[J].管理世界, 2021, (7):130-144
[29]史青春, 牛悦, 徐慧.企业数据要素利用水平影响投资效率机理研究——利用数据要素激活冗余资源的中介作用[J].中央财经大学学报, 2023, (11):105-115
[30]陶长琪, 丁煜.数据要素何以成为创新红利?——源于人力资本匹配的证据[J].中国软科学, 2022, (05):45-56
[31]尹美群, 盛磊, 李文博.高管激励、创新投入与公司绩效——基于内生性视角的分行业实证研究[J].南开管理评论, 2018, 21(01):109-117

Research on the path and mechanism for the high-quality development of enterprises empowered by intelligent transformation: A study based on the perspective of developing new quality productive forces

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Wu Bao, Chen Feng. Research on the impact of ESG activism on green total factor productivity: A study from the perspective of new quality productive forces [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(3): 150-159.
[2]	Chen Yufen, Yang Shuangshuang, Hu Sihui. Construction and measurement of the evaluation index system of new quality productive forces: A study based on the perspective of ‘input-process-output’ [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 1-11.
[3]	Liang Xiaocheng, Lyu Kangyin, Chen Si. Research on the influence of marketization of data elements on the level of new quality productive forces of enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 12-21.
[4]	Guo Yuanyuan, Chen Yilang, Chi Renyong. Research on the system structure for development of new quality productive forces in traditional industry clusters empowered by industrial platforms [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 22-31.
[5]	Yin Ximing, Wu Peiqi, Qian Yating, Liu Xielin. The empowerment of new quality productive forces by the human-machine-context collaboration: Its paradigm logic and practical approaches [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 43-52.
[6]	Zhou Jianping, Xu Weixiang, Guo Jiaxin. Research on the impact of urban knowledge innovation network on the formation of new quality productive forces [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 53-63.
[7]	Jiang Shan, Sun Guangguo. Selective industrial policy, corporate innovation and high-quality development of manufacturing enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(1): 24-33.
[8]	Chen Jinyong, Wang Xiaochi, Chang Haodong, Tian Jie. "Specialized, refined, characteristic and innovative" qualification accreditation policies and technological innovation of small and medium-sized enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(3): 20-30.
[9]	Kang Yanling, Wang Man, Chen Kejing. Can science and technology finance promote high-quality development of enterprises? [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(7): 83-96.
[10]	Xu Zhiyong, Han Bing, Peng Yun, Song Ze. Enterprise financialization, technological innovation and high-quality development of enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(6): 74-84.
[11]	Yao Shanshan, Duan Haiyan. Persistent innovation and high-quality development of financially distressed enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(5): 44-53.
[12]	Xia Ming, Zhou Wenyong, Xie Zhimin. Synergy path of the high-quality development of urban digital economy: A qualitative comparative analysis based on the techno-economic paradigm [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(3): 65-74.
[13]	Wang Weinan, Wang Kai, Yan Zichun. Research on the influence mechanism of regional high-quality development on innovation performance of "SRDI" small-and medium-sized enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(2): 32-44.
[14]	. Research on the impact of entrepreneurship and innovation demonstration base on high-quality economic development [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(10): 35-42.
[15]	Deng Jie, Pan Shuang, Ye Dezhu. Officials′ tenure, policy preferences and urban innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(1): 114-124.