Research on the construction path of IUR innovation consortium in the context of Chinese modernization

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.02.008

Abstract

Abstract: Industry-university-research (IUR) innovation consortium represents the latest endeavor to establish Chinese IUR deep integrated technological innovation system. However, current efforts in constructing IUR innovation consortia confront considerable challenges, including unclear organizational models, outdated institutional mechanisms, and unknown construction paths. In view of the prevailing circumstances, this paper employed a multi-case study methodology, selected four representative cases of government-led IUR innovation consortium, university-led IUR innovation consortium, research-institute-led IUR innovation consortium, and enterprise-led IUR innovation consortium as research subjects, and analyzed thoroughly the organizational mode innovation and institutional mechanism innovation within four IUR innovation consortia, finally deriving a comprehensive construction path model for IUR innovation consortia. The research findings revealed that constructing IUR innovation consortia should be led by leading organizations with active participation of upstream and downstream enterprises, universities and research institutes, guided by government strategic requirements, motivated by market demands, and bound together by common interests. Constructing IUR innovation consortia also needs to implement a series of organizational mode innovations to overcome innovation barriers, undertake a series of institutional mechanism innovations to break innovation bottlenecks, and effectively integrate diverse innovation entities and elements within the innovation chain and industrial chain, ultimately enhancing overall innovation efficiency. This paper has concluded comprehensive theoretical explanations from "what to build" to "how to build" and then to "how to manage" IUR innovation consortia, thereby developing Chinese localized research IUR and innovation consortia and offering valuable insights into practices of constructing IUR innovation consortia in the context of Chinese modernization.

Key words: IUR innovation consortium, construction path, organizational mode innovation, institutional mechanism innovation, multi-case study

Zhang Yufei, Liu Bing, Yuan Changhong, Zhang Shuman. Research on the construction path of IUR innovation consortium in the context of Chinese modernization[J]. Science Research Management, 2025, 46(2): 73-85.

References

[1] 张羽飞, 原长弘, 张树满. 共建产学研创新联合体对科技中小企业创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2023, 20(01):76-85.
[2] 张羽飞, 原长弘, 张树满. 产学研融合程度对科技型中小企业创新绩效的影响[J].科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(09):64-74.
[3] 王巍, 陈劲, 尹西明等. 高水平研究型大学驱动创新联合体建设的探索：以中国西部科技创新港为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2022, 43(04):21-39.
[4] 邵进. 产学研深度融合的探索与思考——基于三重螺旋模型的分析[J]. 中国高校科技, 2015(8):7-9.
[5] 王钰莹, 原长弘, 张树满. 从合作迈向融合：民营企业产学研联盟组合多样性[J]. 科学学研究, 2021, 39(07):1257-1266.
[6] 熊鸿儒. 我国产学研深度融合的短板和挑战在哪里?[J]. 学习与探索, 2021(05):126-133+192.
[7] 沙其富, 任媛媛. 环巢湖科技创新走廊产学研融合机制研究[J]. 中国高校科技, 2019(07):75-78.
[8] 张羽飞, 原长弘, 王涛, 等. 产学研深度融合演化路径分析——基于浙江清华长三角研究院的纵向案例研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(07):87-98.
[9] 章芬, 原长弘, 郭建路. 新型研发机构中产学研深度融合——体制机制创新的密码[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(11):43-53.
[10] 张赤东, 彭晓艺. 创新联合体的概念界定与政策内涵[J]. 科技中国, 2021, 285(06):5-9.
[11] 郭菊娥, 王梦迪, 冷奥琳. 企业布局搭建创新联合体重塑创新生态的机理与路径研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 42(01):76-84.
[12] 白京羽, 刘中全, 王颖婕. 基于博弈论的创新联合体动力机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(10):105-113.
[13] 尹西明, 陈泰伦, 陈劲等. 面向科技自立自强的高能级创新联合体建设[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 51(02):51-60.
[14] 李亚兵, 游肖迪, 赵振. 创新联合体关系嵌入对中小企业创新能力的影响[J]. 华东经济管理, 2022, 36(10):120-128.
[15] 马宗国, 范学爱. 基于研究联合体的国家自主创新示范区企业转型升级评价——2016—2020年1827家上市公司的实证分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(14):23-33.
[16] 王欣,宋燕平,王艳荣.联合体内部互动对家庭农场价值共创意愿的影响研究——基于安徽省农业产业化联合体的实证分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2023,44(03):143-154.
[17] 王峥, 龚轶. 创新共同体:概念、框架与模式[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(01):140-148+175.
[18] 王章豹, 韩依洲, 洪天求. 产学研协同创新组织模式及其优劣势分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015, (2):24-29.
[19] 陈劲, 阳镇. 融通创新视角下关键核心技术的突破: 理论框架与实现路径[J]. 社会科学, 2021(05): 58-69.
[20] 董睿, 张海涛. 产学研协同创新模式演进中知识转移机制设计[J]. 软科学, 2018, 32(11):6-10.
[21] Zhang Y, Yuan C, Zhang S. Influences of university-industry alliance portfolio depth and breadth on growth of new technology-based firms: Evidence from China[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2022, 102:190-204.
[22] Lioukas C S, Reuer J J. Choosing between safeguards: Scope and governance decisions in R&D alliances[J]. Journal of Management, 2020, 46(3):359-384.
[23] 袁伟, 高继平, 于薇, 等. 融通创新模式及其支撑体系构建——荷兰人工智能创新中心对我国人工智能领域发展的启示[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(17):1-8.
[24] Miller K, McAdam R, McAdam M. A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: Toward a research agenda [J]. R&D Management, 2018, 48(1):7-24.
[25] 朱国军,王修齐,张宏远.智能制造核心企业如何牵头组建创新联合体——来自华为智能汽车业务的探索性案例研究[J].科技进步与对策,2022,39(19):12-19.
[26] 邵汉华, 王瑶, 罗俊. 技术市场发展促进了产学研深度融合吗? [J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(11):99-108.
[27] 张嘉毅, 原长弘. 产学研融合的组织模式特征——基于不同主体主导的典型案例研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022, 313(05):71-80+98.
[28] 杨静, 文家春. “目标-结构-行动”框架下创新共同体知识产权集群管理机制建构[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(04):153-162.
[29] Yin R K. Case study research: Design and methods[M]. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage publications, 2013.
[30] Eisenhardt K M, Graebner M E. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1): 25-32.

Research on the construction path of IUR innovation consortium in the context of Chinese modernization

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 9

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	. The upgrading paths of the innovation ecosystem of industry alliances [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(9): 20-31.
[2]	Huang Hao, Wang Guohong. Research on the social defense mechanism of innovative SMEs from the perspective of institutional logics [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(3): 108-116.
[3]	Zhang Fen, Yuan Changhong, Guo Jianlu. Deep integration of industry, university and research in new R&D institutions: The password of institutional mechanism innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(11): 43-53.
[4]	Guo Runping, Cai Li, Wang Ling. Strategic integration modes of knowledge and competitive advantage: A multi-case study of high-tech entrepreneurial firms [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(2): 97-105.
[5]	Zhang Xinxiang, Hu Lijun. Dynamic evolution mechanism of business models：A multi-case content analysis based on the Internet industry [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(3): 110-121.
[6]	Gao Luan, Liu Luning, Feng Yuqiang, Jia Chunmei. Research on ERP Assimilation-Oriented User Learning and Growing Path [J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(2): 112-124.
[7]	Wang Gang, Li Xianjun, Zhang Bowen, Meng Donghui, Gao Ge. Innovation policies and mechanisms: Evidences from four industries in China [J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(4): 1-10.
[8]	Li Jinghua, Ma Xin. Knowledge transfer mechanism between front - and back - offices in the launch stage of new service development [J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(3): 43-50.
[9]	Zhu Fangwei, Yu Miao, Sun Xiuxia. The independent innovation pattern of automobile joint ventures in China [J]. Science Research Management, 2013, (6): 152-160.