科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 164-173.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.10.017

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

资源组合与企业绿色创新的组态研究

胡应得1，易甜甜1，韩洪云2   

  1. 1.浙江工业大学管理学院，浙江 杭州310014;
    2.浙江大学公共管理学院，浙江 杭州310015
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-27 修回日期:2024-12-28 接受日期:2024-12-30 出版日期:2025-10-20 发布日期:2025-10-14
  • 通讯作者: 韩洪云
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目：“‘三重压力’下制造业数字化转型的新困境、新路径与政策优化研究”(22AGL003,2022—2025）；国家社会科学基金一般项目：“污染防治攻坚战中环保政策的不确定性对企业环保行为的影响机理及应对策略研究”（20BJY087,2020—2024)。 

Configuration research on resource combination and enterprise green innovation

Hu Yingde1, Yi Tiantian1, Han Hongyun2   

  1. 1. School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, China; 
    2. School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310015, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2023-10-27 Revised:2024-12-28 Accepted:2024-12-30 Online:2025-10-20 Published:2025-10-14

摘要：    资源组合是解决企业绿色创新资源约束问题的有效方式，但现有文献对此却鲜有关注。本文基于资源基础观和社会网络理论，选取浙江嘉兴市139家排污企业作为研究样本，采用fsQCA方法，从组态视角分析了企业外部的社会网络（组织型网络、商务型网络、行政型网络）和内部冗余资源（人力冗余、财务冗余和技术冗余）两个层面六类资源因素对企业绿色创新的组合效应。研究发现：组织型网络、商务型网络、行政型网络、人力冗余、财务冗余和技术冗余均不是促进企业绿色创新的必要条件；有3种资源组合能促进企业绿色创新，包括内部挖潜为主的人力资源驱动型、内部挖潜与组织型网络并行驱动型和外部借力为主的行政型网络驱动型。但异质性分析结果表明：不同类型的企业偏好不同类型的资源组合模式。大型企业以借力为主，更偏好于组织与商务型网络驱动模式；中小型企业以内部挖潜为主，偏好于内部提升式资源组合。高新技术企业和一般企业均偏好于内部挖潜。本文为解释企业绿色创新的权变关系提供了新视角，研究结论揭示了企业在绿色创新决策中的多元化资源组合路径，为公共事务部门设计更精准化的政策提供了理论支撑。

关键词: 绿色创新, 资源组合, 社会网络, 冗余资源, 模糊集定性比较分析

Abstract:    Resource combination is an effective way to alleviate resource constraints of enterprise green innovation, but little literature has paid attention to it. Based on the resource-based view and social network theory, this paper selected 139 pollutant discharge enterprises in Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province as research samples, adopted the fsQCA method, and analyzed the combined effect of 6 resources factors, including organizational networks, business networks, administrative networks, human redundancy, financial redundancy and technical redundancy on enterprise green innovations from the perspective of configuration. The results showed that: (1) organizational networks, business networks, administrative networks, human redundancy, financial redundancy and technical redundancy are not the necessary conditions to stimulate enterprise green innovations. (2) There are three resource combinations that can stimulate enterprises to adopt green innovations, including human resource driven mainly by internal exploitation, organizational networks driven by internal and external parallel, and administrative networks driven mainly by leveraging outside strength. (3) Different types of enterprises prefer different types of resource combinations through heterogeneity analysis: Large enterprises mainly leverage outside strength, and prefer organizational and business networks driven resource combination; SME mainly focus on internal potential exploration and prefer internal promotion resource combination; both hightech enterprises and general enterprises prefer exploration of their internal potentials. This paper will provide a new perspective to explain the contingency relationship of enterprises adopting green innovations, and those results will provide practical implications for revealing the multiple resource paths of enterprises in decisionmaking on green innovations, which are important for the public affairs department to design more precise environmental policy combinations to motivate enterprises adopting green innovations. 

Key words: green innovation, resource combination, social network, redundant resource, fsQCA