碳税政策下基于供应链视角的最优减排与定价策略及协调

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6): 81-91.

碳税政策下基于供应链视角的最优减排与定价策略及协调

程永宏, 熊中楷

重庆大学经济与工商管理学院, 重庆 400030

收稿日期:2013-05-09 修回日期:2015-01-09 出版日期:2015-06-25 发布日期:2015-06-23
通讯作者: 程永宏
作者简介:程永宏(1983-),男(汉),甘肃平凉人,博士研究生,研究方向:物流与供应链管理。
熊中楷(1948-),男(汉),江西南昌人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:运作管理,物流与供应链管理,决策优化。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目"碳排放约束下再制造闭环供应链协调机制及绩效评价研究"(71271225, 2013.01－2016.12);重庆市研究生科研创新项目"碳排放政策和消费者环保意识下企业库存与碳减排投资研究"(CYB14001, 2015.01－2016.12)。

The optimal emission reduction and pricing strategies and coordination based on the perspective of supply chain under carbon tax policy

Cheng Yonghong, Xiong Zhongkai

School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China

Received:2013-05-09 Revised:2015-01-09 Online:2015-06-25 Published:2015-06-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 鉴于众多学者从宏观和微观层面研究了碳税对二氧化碳减排效果和企业生产决策的影响, 本文首次从供应链的视角建立了集中式和分散式决策模型, 分别讨论了碳税政策下制造商和零售商的最优二氧化碳减排和定价策略, 以及税率对单位产品二氧化碳减排量和销售价格的影响。研究表明:碳税政策下单位产品的二氧化碳减排量和销售价格不仅依赖于碳税税率, 还与其初始二氧化碳排放量以及供应链的决策方式有关。此外, 碳税政策下分散式决策存在"双重边际效应"问题, 于是通过两部定价合同实现了供应链的完美协调。最后通过数值仿真进一步验证了相应的结论, 并就如何提高供应链的减排效率给出了一些建议和对策。

关键词: 供应链, 碳税, 减排成本, 两部定价合同, 博弈论

Abstract: In view of the fact that many scholars have studied the effect of carbon tax on emission reduction and firm's production decision from the macroscopic and microcosmic aspects, this paper initially establishes the centralized and decentralized decision-making models from the perspective of supply chain, then discusses respectively the optimal carbon dioxide emission reductions and pricing strategies for the manufacturer and retailer, and the impact of carbon tax rate on carbon dioxide emission reductions and product sale price. Some results show that the carbon dioxide emission reductions of per-unit product not only depend on the government's carbon tax rate, but also relate to its initial carbon dioxide emissions and the choices of decision-making in supply chain. In addition, there is the problem of "double marginalization" under the decentralized decision-making with carbon tax policy, so we coordinate supply chain with the two-part tariff contract. Finally, we further verify the conclusions by using numerical simulations, and give a number of suggestions and strategies for improving the efficiency of emission reduction for the supply chain.

Key words: supply chain, carbon tax, abatement costs, two-part tariff contract, game theory

中图分类号:

F272.3

程永宏, 熊中楷. 碳税政策下基于供应链视角的最优减排与定价策略及协调[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(6): 81-91.

Cheng Yonghong, Xiong Zhongkai. The optimal emission reduction and pricing strategies and coordination based on the perspective of supply chain under carbon tax policy[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(6): 81-91.

参考文献

[1] 国务院发展研究中心课题组.全球温室气体减排:理论框架和解决方案[J].经济研究, 2009(3):4-13.Project Team of Development Research Center of the State Council of China.Greenhouse gas emissions reduction:A theoretical framework and global solution[J].Economic Research Journal, 2009(3):4-13.(in Chinese) [2] Bernard P H, Jose T R.An international carbon tax to combat global warming:An economic and political analysis of the European Union proposal [J].American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1995, 54(3):257-267. [3] European Environment Agency (EEA).Environmental taxes implementation and environmental effectiveness [M].Copenhagen:EEA, 1996. [4] Pearce D.The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming [J].Economic Journal, 1991, 101(407):938-948. [5] 高鹏飞, 陈文颖.碳税与碳排放[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 42(10):1335-1338.Gao Pengfei, Chen Wenying.Carbon tax and carbon emission[J].Journal of Tsinghua University (Sci & Tech), 2002, 42(10):1335-1338.(in Chinese) [6] Floros N, Vlachou A.Energy demand and energy-related CO₂ emissions in Greek manufacturing:Assessing the impact of a carbon tax [J].Energy Economics, 2005, 27(3):387-413. [7] Cheng F L, Sue J L, Charles, Chang Y F.Effects of carbon taxes on different industries by fuzzy goal programming:A case study of the petrochemical-related industries, Taiwan [J].Energy Policy, 2007, (35):4051-4058. [8] 王金南, 严刚, 姜克隽等.应对气候变化的中国碳税政策研究[J].中国环境科学, 2009, 29(1):101-105.Wang Jinnan, Yan Gang, Jiang Kejun et al.The study on China's carbon tax policy to mitigate climate change[J].China Environmental Science, 2009, 29(1):101-105.(in Chinese) [9] Lu C Y, Tong Q, Liu X M.The impacts of carbon tax and complementary policies on Chinese economy [J].Energy Policy, 2010, 38, 7278-7285. [10] 朱永彬, 刘晓, 王铮.碳税政策的减排效应及其对我国经济的影响分析[J].中国软科学, 2010(4):1-9.Zhu Yongbin, Liu Xiao, Wang Zheng.Abatement effect of carbon tax and its impacts on economy in China[J].China Soft Science Magazine, 2010(4):1-9.(in Chinese) [11] 姚昕, 刘希颖.基于增长视角的中国最优碳税研究[J].经济研究, 2011(11):48-58.Yao Xin, Liu Xiying.Optimal carbon tax in China with the perspective of economic growth[J].Economic Research Journal, 2011(11):48-58.(in Chinese) [12] 刘洁, 李文.征收碳税对中国经济影响的实证[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(9):99-104.Liu Jie, Li Wen.Effects of introduction carbon tax on China's economy[J].China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(9):99-104.(in Chinese) [13] Baranzni A, Goldemberg J, Speck S.A future for carbon taxes [J].Ecological Economics, 2000, 32(3):395-412. [14] Baker E, Shittu E.Profit-maximizing R&D in response to a random carbon tax[J].Resource and Energy Economics, 2006, 28(2):160-180. [15] Wissema W, Dellink R.AGE analysis of the impact of a carbon energy tax on the Irish economy [J].Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(4):671-683. [16] 聂华林, 周建鹏, 张华.基于减排效应的能源类企业碳税政策的优化选择研究[J].资源科学, 2011, 33 (10):1906-1913.Nie Hualin, Zhou Jianpeng, Zhang Hua.Optimization choices of carbon tax policies for energy enterprises based on effects of carbon emissions reduction[J].Resources Science, 2011, 33 (10):1906-1913.(in Chinese) [17] Yalabik B, Fairchild R J.Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation [J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 131(2):519-527. [18] 李长胜, 范英, 朱磊.基于两阶段博弈模型的钢铁行业碳强度减排机制研究[J].中国管理科学, 2012, 20(2):93-101.Li Changsheng, Fan Ying, Zhu Lei.The study of carbon dioxide emission intensity abatement mechanism of iron and steel industry based on two-stage game model[J].Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012, 20(2):93-101.(in Chinese) [19] 宋之杰, 孙其龙.减排视角下企业的最优研发与补贴 [J].科研管理, 2012, 33(10):80-89.Song Zhijie, Sun Qilong.The optimal R&D investment and subsidy under the perspective of emission reduction[J].Science Research Management, 2012, 33(10):80-89.(in Chinese) [20] 付丽苹, 刘爱东.征收碳税对高碳企业转型的激励模型 [J].系统工程, 2012, 30(7):94-98.Fu Liping, Liu Aidong.Modeling the incentive effect of carbon tax policy on the transformation of high carbon-emission enterprises[J].Systems Engineering, 2012, 30(7):94-98.(in Chinese) [21] 李媛, 赵道致, 祝晓光.基于碳税的政府与企业行为博弈模型研究 [J].资源科学, 2013, 35(1):125-131.Li Yuan, Zhao Daozhi, Zhu Xiaoguang.A game model for government and enterprise behavior based on a carbon tax [J].Resources Science, 2013, 35(1):125-131.(in Chinese) [22] Cui T H, Raju J S, Zhang Z J.Fairness and channel coordination [J].Management Science, 2007, 53(8):1303-1314. [23] Raju J S, Zhang Z J.Channel coordination in the presence of a dominant retailer [J].Marketing Science, 2005, 24 (2):254-2621. [24] Cachon G P, Kok A G.Competing manufacturers in a retail supply chain:On contractual form and coordination [J].Management Science, 2010, 56(3):571-589.