Research on the impact of R&D resource mismatch on the efficiency of industrial green technology innovation:Based on the threshold effect of digital economy

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.06.010

Abstract

Abstract: Industrial green technology innovation is an important link to promote green development and harmonious coexistence between man and nature, and it plays a vital role in promoting the development of real economy and promoting new industrialization. However, the unreasonable allocation of R&D resources restricts the improvement of the innovation efficiency of industrial green technology and seriously hinders the process of China′s green development. With the rapid development of digital technology, digital economy has achieved unprecedented development, and it has a profound impact on the mode of production and production factors. Based on the panel data of 30 provincial-level regions in China from 2011 to 2020, this paper studied and measured the impact of R&D resource mismatch on innovation efficiency of industrial green technology, as well as the impact mechanism of digital economy development on R&D resource mismatch and innovation efficiency of industrial green technology.Introducing the harmless rate of industrial solid waste representing environmental benefits into the measurement index system of the innovation efficiency of industrial green technology, this paper used the super efficiency SBM model to estimate the innovation efficiency of China′s industrial green technology, and calculate the degree of mismatch of R&D resources by modeling. A two-way fixed effect model of time and individual was established to analyze the influence of R&D resource mismatch on innovation efficiency of industrial green technology. A threshold effect model was built to regress and analyze the threshold effect that digital economy plays a coordinating role in R&D resource mismatch and innovation efficiency of industrial green technology. The results show that: (1) The industrial R&D resources in 30 provincial-level administrative regions in China have shown a shortage of allocation, and the efficiency of industrial green technology innovation shows strong regional heterogeneity; (2) The mismatch of R&D personnel and capital will significantly inhibit the improvement of China′s innovation efficiency of industrial green technology. The regression results showed that compared with R&D personnel, R&D capital mismatch has a stronger and more significant inhibitory effect on the efficiency of industrial green technology innovation; (3) Under the moderating effect of digital economy, R&D resource mismatch has a U-shaped influence mechanism on the efficiency of industrial green technology innovation. When the digital economy reaches the threshold value, R&D personnel and capital will change from inhibiting the improvement of efficiency to promoting the improvement of efficiency. The threshold value of R&D personnel is higher than that of R&D capital, but the positive promotion coefficient after reaching the threshold is much larger than that of R&D capital. This paper will enrich the research ideas on the innovation efficiency of industrial green technology, and provide empirical basis and policy recommendations for accelerating the development of the digital economy, optimizing resource allocation, and promoting the efficiency of industrial green technology innovation.

Key words: R&D resource mismatch, innovation efficiency of industrial green technology, digital economy, fixed effect, threshold effect

Fan Decheng, Jia Mingzhe. Research on the impact of R&D resource mismatch on the efficiency of industrial green technology innovation:Based on the threshold effect of digital economy[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(6): 95-104.

References

[1]杨浩昌, 李廉水, 张发明.高技术产业集聚与绿色技术创新绩效[J].科研管理, 2020, 41(09):99-112 [2]钱丽, 王文平, 肖仁桥.技术异质下中国企业绿色创新效率及损失来源分析[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(09):127-138 [3]柏培文, 张云.数字经济、人口红利下降与中低技能劳动者权益[J].经济研究, 2021, 56(05):91-108 [4]孙燕铭, 谌思邈.长三角区域绿色技术创新效率的时空演化格局及驱动因素[J].地理研究, 2021, 40(10):2743-2759 [5]Sueyoshi T, Wang D.Radial and non-radial approaches for environmental assessment by data envelopment analysis: Corporate sustainability and effective investment for technology innovation[J].Energy Economics, 2014, 45:537-551 [6]Yang Y, Wu D, Xu M, et al.Capital misallocation, technological innovation, and green development efficiency: Empirical analysis based on China provincial panel data[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, :1-14 [7]Deng Q, Zhou S, Peng F.Measuring green innovation efficiency for China’s high-tech manufacturing industry: a network DEA approach[J].Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, :- [8]Chen W, Wang X, Peng N, et al.Evaluation of the green innovation efficiency of Chinese industrial enterprises: research based on the three-stage chain network SBM model[J].Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, :- [9]陈宇科, 刘蓝天, 董景荣.环境规制工具、区域差异与企业绿色技术创新——基于系统和动态门槛的中国省级数据分析[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(04):111-118 [10]王珍愚, 曹瑜, 林善浪.环境规制对企业绿色技术创新的影响特征与异质性——基于中国上市公司绿色专利数据[J].科学学研究, 2021, 39(05):909-919 [11]王洪庆, 郝雯雯.高新技术产业集聚对我国绿色创新效率的影响研究[J].中国软科学, 2022, 37(08):172-183 [12]钱丽, 王文平, 肖仁桥.高质量发展视域下中国企业绿色创新效率及其技术差距[J].管理工程学报, 2021, 35(06):97-114 [13]唐晓华, 迟子茗.工业智能化提升工业绿色发展效率的实证研究[J].经济学家, 2022, 34(02):43-52 [14]Hsieh C T, Klenow P J.Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009, 124(4):1403-1448 [15]戴小勇.中国高创新投入与低生产率之谜:资源错配视角的解释[J].世界经济, 2021, 44(03):86-109 [16]杭静, 郭凯明, 牛梦琦.资源错配、产能利用与生产率[J].经济学季刊, 2021, 21(01):93-112 [17]王永进, 李宁宁.中间品贸易自由化与要素市场扭曲[J].中国工业经济, 2021, 39(09):43-61 [18]吕承超, 王志阁.要素资源错配对企业创新的作用机制及实证检验——基于制造业上市公司的经验分析[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(05):1137-1153 [19]杨慧梅, 江璐.数字经济、空间效应与全要素生产率[J].统计研究, 2021, 38(04):3-15 [20]田鸽, 张勋.数字经济、非农就业与社会分工[J].管理世界, 2022, 38(05):72-84 [21]柏培文, 喻理.数字经济发展与企业价格加成：理论机制与经验事实[J].中国工业经济, 2021, 39(11):59-77 [22]韦庄禹.数字经济发展对制造业企业资源配置效率的影响研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39(03):66-85 [23]Tone K.A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J].European journal of operational research, 2001, 130(3):498-509 [24]Tone K.A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J].European journal of operational research, 2002, 143(1):32-41 [25]易明, 吴婷.资源配置扭曲、与人力资本的纠偏作用[J].科学学研究, 2021, 39(01):42-52 [26]白俊红, 刘宇英.对外直接投资能否改善中国的资源错配[J].中国工业经济, 2018, 36(01):60-78 [27]崔书会, 李光勤, 豆建民.产业协同集聚的资源错配效应研究[J].统计研究, 2019, 36(02):76-87 [28]谷军健, 赵玉林.中国如何走出科技创新困境?——基于科技创新与人力资本协同发展的新视角[J].科学学研究, 2021, 39(01):129-138 [29]李振洋, 白雪洁.产业政策如何促进制造业绿色全要素生产率提升?——基于鼓励型政策和限制型政策协同的视角[J].产业经济研究, 2020, 19(06):28-42 [30]宋炜, 张彩红, 周勇, 董明放.数据要素与研发决策对工业全要素生产率的影响——来自-年中国工业的经验证据[J].科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(02):40-48 [31]范德成, 谷晓梅.高技术产业技术创新效率关键影响因素分析——基于-和方法的实证研究[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(01):70-78 [32]赵涛, 张智, 梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(10):65-76 [33]刘军, 杨渊鋆, 张三峰.中国数字经济测度与驱动因素研究[J].上海经济研究, 2020, (06):81-96 [34]郭峰, 王靖一, 王芳, 孔涛, 张勋, 程志云.测度中国数字普惠金融发展:指数编制与空间特征[J].经济学季刊, 2020, 19(04):1401-1418

Research on the impact of R&D resource mismatch on the efficiency of industrial green technology innovation:Based on the threshold effect of digital economy

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Wu Haizhen, Han Zhaoan, Yun Lexin. Research on the paths and characteristics of the regional innovation quality enabled by digital economy [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(7): 59-67.
[2]	Gao Lintong, Meng Fei, Tian Qibo. Impact of digital finance on enterprise technological innovation and its spatial effect [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(6): 72-82.
[3]	Xu Zhiyong, Zhang Na. Research on the impact of asset structure allocation on the high-quality development of enterprises: An analysis based on the moderating effect of digital economy [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(6): 116-125.
[4]	Yu Changlin, Shen Bing. Research on the impact of digital economy development on China′s factor market distortion [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(6): 62-71.
[5]	He Zhengchu, Cai Xiangjie, Pan Weihua. The synergistic development of digital economy and technology service industry and their synergistic effects on regional economy [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(3): 133-142.
[6]	Chen Wei, Deng Yao, Li Yushan, Zhang Shuo. Research on the impact of Internet development on technological innovation from the perspective of intellectual property protection [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(3): 151-160.
[7]	Wei Dongming, Xu Yang, Gu Naihua. Digital economy promote the high-quality economic development [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(9): 10-19.
[8]	Su Yi, Zhi Pengfei, Guo Xiufang. Measurement of the scale of regional digital economy and its impact on regional innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(9): 29-38.
[9]	Li Zhendong, Chen Jin, Wang Weinan. Research on the strategic path, theoretical framework and logic of China′s digital development [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(7): 1-10.
[10]	Wang Qian, Liu Xielin. Research on value co-creation in cross-border innovation of enterprises: A study based on the perspective of ecosystem [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(4): 11-18.
[11]	Yuan Hang, Zhu Chengliang. Digital economy, transaction cost and regional innovation and entrepreneurship in China [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(4): 19-28.
[12]	Xia Ming, Zhou Wenyong, Xie Zhimin. Synergy path of the high-quality development of urban digital economy: A qualitative comparative analysis based on the techno-economic paradigm [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(3): 65-74.
[13]	Li Guangqin, Jin Yuping. A study on the environmental effect in the opening of digital economy based on the ICT import and export data [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(12): 31-41.
[14]	Wang Fang, Shi Xin. The relationship among the Internet, industry competition intensity and innovation efficiency [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(9): 119-126.
[15]	. An analysis of the trend of digital economy in foreign countries and China′s countermeasures from the perspective of think tank [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(8): 32-39.