Research on the micro mechanism of innovation leading the breakthroughs of modern engineering technology: An exploratory case of CNPC

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.06.003

Abstract

Abstract: Modern engineering technology is an essential support for the development of new quality productive forces. Under the new nationwide system tackling mode, exploring how enterprises can lead breakthroughs in modern engineering technology has become urgent and crucial. In this regard, this study conducts an exploratory case study on how CNPC has achieved breakthroughs in modern engineering technology, combining the theory of leading innovation paradigm. The study found that: (1) The centralized technological innovation decision-making mechanism, consisting of gathering together to identify technological paradigms, unifying core resource configuration, and effectively sharing innovative knowledge, offers the optimal decisions for modern engineering technology breakthroughs. (2) The organizational structure of differential sequence technology innovation, centered around R&D organizations targeting innovation chains, innovation diffusion organizations targeting application scenarios, and technology commercialization ecosystems, provides the organizational foundation for modern engineering technology breakthroughs. (3) The Long-Tail technology innovation strategic framework, centered around long-term foundational innovation, short-term incremental innovation, and complementary asset accumulation and configuration, provides the strategic guarantee for modern engineering technology breakthroughs. This study identifies three core mechanisms that lead modern engineering technology breakthroughs within enterprises, which are decision-making mechanisms, organizational patterns, and strategic frameworks. It expands the theoretical system of key core technological breakthroughs at the enterprise level and provides management insights for related enterprises′ technological breakthrough practices.

Key words: innovation leading, modern engineering technology, key core technology breakthrough, case study

Yang Lei, Liu Haibing, Jiang Chunyan. Research on the micro mechanism of innovation leading the breakthroughs of modern engineering technology: An exploratory case of CNPC[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(6): 22-32.

References

[1]习近平：高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[N]. 新华社, 2022-10-25. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm
[2]盛昭瀚，游庆仲，陈国华，等.大型工程综合集成管理:苏通大桥工程管理理论的探索与思考[M]．北京:科学出版社,2009:163－181.
[3]汪涛,韩淑慧.重大工程中国有企业主导整合实现产业技术追赶机制[J].技术经济,2021,(09):56-64.
[4]苏楠,吴贵生.用户主导创新理论探源[J].技术经济,2016,(5):1-5+68.
[5]王福涛,周丹丹,张振刚.国家工程技术研究中心民营化绩效研究[J].管理学报,2016,(06):829-835.
[6]刘慧敏,盛昭瀚,夏国星,阮静.重大工程技术创新定位与战略选择——以泰州大桥技术创新为例[J].科学技术哲学研究,2014,(06):105-109.
[7]陈劲,阳银娟.协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J].科学学研究,2012,(02):161-164.
[8]Mathews,John A.Dragon multinationals powered by linkage,leverage and learning: A review and development[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2017,34(4):769-775.
[9]Awate S.,Larsen M.M.,Mudambi R.EMNE Catch-up Strategies in the Wind Turbine Industry:Is there a Trade-ofzzf between Output and Innovation Capabilities[J].Journal of Global,2012,2(3):205-223.
[10]吴晓波,付亚男,吴东,雷李楠.后发企业如何从追赶到超越?——基于机会窗口视角的双案例纵向对比分析[J].管理世界,2019,35(02):151-167+200..
[11]贾玉树：从工程技术走向工程科学[J].建设机械技术与管理,2020,(03):16-17.
[12]蒋学东,邓履翔,涂鹏,阳丽霞.中国科技期刊卓越行动计划引领下的工程技术类期刊角色功能重塑途径探析[J].科技与出版,2021,(01):145-150.
[13]张爱琴,侯光明.工程技术项目创新机理研究——兼论创新方法的驱动作用[J].科技管理研究,2015,(24):13-18.
[14]闫娜,叶海超,邸伟娜.石油工程技术商业化模式选择策略研究[J].科技管理研究,2013,(16):119-123.
[15]洪巍,周晶.基于演化博弈的大型工程技术创新过程中业主与供应商的合作机制研究[J].工业技术经济,2013,(05):106-112.
[16]张爱琴,侯光明,李存金.面向工程技术项目的群体创新方法集成研究[J].科学学研究,2014,(02):297-304.
[17]林宽海,丁慧平,刘倩.基于能力构建的石油企业工程技术服务一体化模式[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2015,(01):70-80+136.
[18]林宽海,丁慧平,刘倩.基于顾客价值创造的服务型企业关键能力构建——以石油工程技术服务企业为例[J].经济管理,2013,(09):63-72.
[19]刘红勇,陈逸奇,杨毅.川西气田油气绿色开采工程技术创新与实践[J].科技管理研究,2014,(23):46-48+52.
[20]Boyer,K.K.,Mcdermott,C.Strategic consensus in operations strategy.Journal of Operations Management,1999,17(3),289-305.
[21]Ketokivi,M.&Castaner,X., Strategic Planning As an Integrative Device,Administrative Science Quarterly,2004,49,pp.337-365。
[22]谢宗晓,林润辉,李康宏,丘东.协同对象、协同模式与创新绩效——基于国家工程技术研究中心的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,(01):63-74.
[23]陈劲,谢芳,贾丽娜.企业集团内部协同创新机理研究[J].管理学报,2006,(06):733-740.
[24]lansiti M,Levien R.Strategy as ecology[J].Harvard Business Review,2004.82(3):68-81.
[25]万勇,冯瑞华,王桂芳.美欧材料基因工程技术政策对比及其启示[J].科技管理研究,2014,(23):69-72.
[26]王健,柳春,屈明剑,高健,庞宇.国家工程技术研究中心建设布局分析和建议[J].科技管理研究,2014,(23):64-68+72.
[27]周琼琼.国家工程技术研究中心技术创新能力指数研究与实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2015,(01):23-28.
[28]蔡建新,田文颖.科技创新平台产学研合作对企业双元创新绩效的影响：基于广东省工程技术中心动态评估数据的研究[J].科技管理研究,2022,(11):102-107.
[29] LEE K，GAO X，LI X， Industrial catch?up in China：A sectoral systems of innovation perspective［J］. Cambridge Journal of Regions，Economy and Society，2017.10(1): 59-76.
[30]乐云,李永奎,胡毅,何清华.“政府—市场”二元作用下我国重大工程组织模式及基本演进规律[J].管理世界,2019,(04):17-27.
[31]刘海兵,许庆瑞. 引领性创新:一种创新管理新范式:基于海尔集团洗衣机产业线的案例研究(2013—2020年)[J].中国科技论坛, 2020. 9:39-48.
[32]刘海兵. 引领性创新:理论脉络?基本内涵与结构构件[J/OL]. 2022.科学学研究:1-15.
[33]刘海兵,许庆瑞,吕佩师. 从驱动到引领“:创新引领”的概念和过程:基于海尔集团的纵向案例研究(1984—2019)[J]. 广西财经学院学报,2020.33(1):127-142.
[34]黄天蔚, 刘海兵, 杨磊, 陈劲. 创新引领产业关键共性技术突破的机制研究——基于方大炭素的案例研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2022, 43(08): 99-116.
[35]王凤彬,张雪.用纵向案例研究讲好中国故事：过程研究范式、过程理论化与中西对话前景[J].管理世界,2022,(06):191-213.
[36]Eisenhardt K. Building theories from case study research[J]. Academy of Management Review,1989.14(3):532-550.
[37]Edmondson,A.C.&Mcmanus,S.E.,Method-ological Fit in Management Field Research",Academy of Management Review,2007,32(4):1155-1179.
[38]冯艳成.科研院所科技创新治理体系与能力构建及实践[J].石油科技论坛,2021,(01):46-52.
[39]闫娜,王敏生,张大军.世界石油工程技术研发管理动向及启示[J].石油科技论坛,2018,(02):56-63.
[40]潘绵臻,毛基业. 再探案例研究的规范性问题:中国企业管理案例论坛(2008)综述与范文分析[J]. 管理世界,2009. 2:99-107+176.
[41]张慧玉,李华晶.创业直觉判断可靠吗——基于自然决策理论与启发式偏见理论的评析[J].科学学研究,2016,(4):574-581.
[42]Kahneman D, Klein G. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree[J]. American psychologist, 2009, 64(6): 515-526.
[43]罗小芳,卢现祥.高质量发展中的创新组织方式转型研究[J].经济纵横,2018,(12):34-41+2.
[44]蔡渊渊,綦良群,张毅,王成东.自主技术创新还是技术引进：范式选择与资源优化配置[J].中国科技论坛,2021,(08):22-32.
[45]张馨,彭纪生,涂海银.企业创新资源配置结构对创新绩效的影响：基于不同产权性质视角[J].科技进步与对策,2021,(08):126-135.
[46]Teece,D.J.Dynamic Capabilities:Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action [J].Journal of Management Studies.2012,49(8):1395-1401.
[47]刘娟,曹杰,张建宇.独占还是共享?研发国际化与企业创新价值获取——来自上市企业专利引用数据的证据[J].国际贸易问题,2022,(09):157-174.
[48]代明,梁意敏,戴毅.创新链解构研究[J].科技进步与对策,2009,(03):157-160.
[49]孙晓华,戴进,王昀.技术创新的演化经济学研究述评[J].科学管理研究,2010,(02):15-19.
[50]杨武,陈培,Gad David.光刻机产业技术扩散与技术动态演化——对“卡脖子”技术的启示[J].中国科技论坛,2022,(09):73-84.
[51]Donald Stokes.Pasteur 's Quadrant Basic Science and Technological Innovation [M].Washington,D.C. Brookings Instit ution Press,1997.
[52]Saxenian A L.The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley[J].Research Policy,1991,20(5):423-437.
[53]Covin J G, Slevin D P. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments[J]. Strategic management journal, 1989, 10(1): 75-87.
[54]Covin J G, Wales W J. Crafting high-impact entrepreneurial orientation research: Some suggested guidelines[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2019, 43(1): 3-18.
[55]焦豪,李倩,杨季枫.企业技术创新管理：研究现状与关键科学问题[J].管理学报,2022,(07):947-955.
[56]Ge, B. S. and Dong, B. B., Resource Integration Process and Venture Performance: Based On The Contingency Model Of Resource Integration Capability[C]. 2008 International Conference On Management Science and Engineering At Long Beach, Usa, 2008,10:281-288.
[57]马鸿佳,董保宝,葛宝山.资源整合过程、能力与企业绩效关系研究[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2011,51(04):71-78.
[58]郑刚,莫康,王颂,邹腾剑,邓宛如.吸收速度、互补资产链接与关键核心技术突破[J].科学学研究2022:1-18.
[59]陈劲.引领性创新：突破关键核心技术的重要范式——评《引领性创新：一种创新管理新范式》系列研究成果[J].创新科技,2022,22(02):93.

Research on the micro mechanism of innovation leading the breakthroughs of modern engineering technology: An exploratory case of CNPC

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	Zhou Quan, Cheng Mengting, Wu Shaobo, Zeng Li. Research on the collaborative construction of the innovation ecosystem of new energy vehicle enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(4): 32-41.
[2]	Lin Haifen, Hai Miao. Mechanism and path to achieve high-end strategic change through non-scale free resource reconfiguration [J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(2): 117-126.
[3]	Lin Haifen, Qu Tingchen. Research on the formation process of strategic change directions from the perspective of organizational paradox [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(6): 40-50.
[4]	Jia Yibo, Su Jingqin. Research on the governance role of hidden champions under global value chains: A case study based on the perspective of knowledge power [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(3): 122-132.
[5]	Li Yuhua, Zhang Jingyi. A study of the integration mechanism with multiple interactions in the service ecosystem [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(11): 94-103.
[6]	Hu Xiao, Yang Delin, Ma Qian. Research on the domestic substitution path of China′s integrated circuit industry driven by the co-evolution of government and markets [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(11): 9-21.
[7]	Guo Xiaochao, Jiang Yuting, Zhang Qiang, Zhang Shengtai, Cui Minjie. Research on the construction and renewal path of enterprise dominant logic under complex situations [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(1): 100-113.
[8]	. The upgrading paths of the innovation ecosystem of industry alliances [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(9): 20-31.
[9]	Wang Xuedong. Research on the mutual eating process between corporate social responsibility and business model innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(7): 106-114.
[10]	Chen Hansong, Tian Zhen. The construction of service ecosystem for incubating enterprises in the context of corporate entrepreneurship——A study based on the resource orchestration theory [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(5): 11-22.
[11]	Huang Hao, Wang Guohong. Research on the social defense mechanism of innovative SMEs from the perspective of institutional logics [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(3): 108-116.
[12]	Liu Haibing, Yang Lei. The evolution law and promotion mechanism of the innovation capability of latecomer high-tech enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(11): 111-123.
[13]	Cui Miao, Zhou Xiaoxue. Overcoming organizational inertia: A study of the realization and evolution path of strategic renewal towards digitalization [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(10): 89-98.
[14]	Xie Maohua, Wang Jiao, Liu Tiexin. Research on the path of improving strategic performance of state-owned enterprises through "mixed reform" and integration: A comparative analysis of two cases from the perspective of dual innovation theory [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(10): 99-115.
[15]	Guo Pibin, Zhang Aiqin. Green transformation and upgrading of enterprises in respect of responsible innovation and dynamic capability [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(7): 31-39.