Innovation essential factor cluster and the spatial spillover oftechnological innovation efficiency in China

Abstract

Abstract: The relationship between innovation essential factor cluster and the technological innovation efficiency in China is analyzed by spatial econometrics of panel data, and main bodies are divided into scientific research institutions, universities, and enterprises. The result of empirical study shows that there is an obvious spatial autocorrelation in the efficiency of China's technological innovation. Innovation essential factor cluster has a negative impact on research institutions' innovation efficiency, an insignificant effect on universities; however the affect is positive for the enterprises. Research institutions and universities innovation essential factor agglomeration is indistinct for the innovation efficiency of spatial spillover effect, and enterprise innovation essential factor agglomeration is obvious for the innovation efficiency of the spatial spillover effect, however the effect is significantly decreased when the distance more than 800 km; government support for the innovative efficiency effect of each innovation main body is indistinct, and even has a side effect.

Key words: innovation essential factor cluster, spatial spillover, innovation efficiency

CLC Number:

F062.4

Yu Yongzen, Liu Dayong. Innovation essential factor cluster and the spatial spillover oftechnological innovation efficiency in China[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(1): 46-54.

References

[1] 邬滋. 集聚结构、知识溢出与区域创新绩效—基于空间计量的分析[J].山西财经大学学报,2010(3):15-22.
[2] 万坤扬,陆文聪.中国技术创新区域变化及其成因分析—基于面板数据的空间计量经济学模型[J].科学学研究,2010(10):1582-1591.
[3] 王锐淇,张宗益. 区域创新能力影响因素的空间面板数据分析[J].科研管理,2010(3):17-21.
[4] 符淼. 地理距离和技术外溢效应—对技术和经济集聚现象的空间计量学解释[J].经济学(季刊),2009(4):1549-1558.
[5] Griliches,Z. Issues in Assessing the Contributions of Research and Development to Productivity Growth[J], Bell Journal of Economics, 1979,10:92-116.
[6] Griliches,Z. The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators When Output Prices Are Unobserved and Endogenous[J], Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1996,11 (4):89-95.
[7] 朱有为,徐康宁. 中国高技术产业研发效率的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(11):38-44.
[8] Battese, G.E., and Coelli, T.J. A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data [J], Empirical Economics, 1995,89(20):325-332.
[9] Kumbhakar, S.C. and Lovell C., .Stochastic Frontier Analysis[M], New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[10] Porter, Clusters and the New Economics of Competition[J], Harvard Business Review,1998, 76 (6):77-90.
[11] 赵建吉,曾刚. 创新的空间测度:数据与指标[J]. 经济地理, 2009(8):1250-1255.
[12] Henderson, J.V. Will Homeowners Impose Property Taxes[J], Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1995(25):153-181.
[13] Moran, P.A.P. Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena[J], Biometrika,1950 , 37(17):445-462.
[14] Anselin, L.The Moran Scatterplot as an ESDA Tool to Assess Local Instability in Spatial Association in Fischer, M., H. Scholten, and D. Unwin(eds.)Spatial Analytical Perspectives on GIS. London[M], UK: Taylor and Francis, 1996.
[15] Anselin, L., Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models[M], Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic,1988.
[16] Lesage,J.P. The Theory and Practice of Spatial Econometrics , http://www.spatial-econometrics.com, 1999.
[17] Elhorst, J.P. Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models[J], International Regional Science Review, 2003, 26(3):244-267.
[18] 李伟红,陈燕. 基于DEA模型的区域创新系统中政府作用的评价研究[J].价值工程,2007(8):33-35.
[19] 曹利民. 政府组织促进区域创新体系构建的体制机制研究 ,复旦大学博士论文,2008.
[20] 樊纲,王小鲁等. 中国市场化指数—中国各地区市场化相对进程报告[M],经济科学出版社,2001-2006.
[21] Lucas, R. E. On the Mechanics of Economic Development[J], Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988, 22(1).284-343.
[22] 陈钊,陆铭,金煜. 中国人力资本和教育发展的区域差异:对于面板数据的估算[J].世界经济, 2004(12):25-31.