The policy correlativity for the development of innovative talents and teams

Abstract

Abstract: By using the approaches for policy analysis and questionnaires methods, the correlativity of human resource policies among the National Outline of Medium and Long-term Plan for Science and Technology Development (2006-2020), the supporting policies, and implementation details are systemically analyzed. The results show that there is a preliminary policy system for developing innovative talents and teams in China. However, there are some inconsistent between the supporting policies and implementation details, and some of the implementation details are unable to effectively support the supporting policies. In order to build a large-scaled and effective innovative talents and teams, the four issues, including regulating related concepts and standards in supporting policies and implementation details,cultivating and guiding talents into enterprises and rural areas, setting up the incentive mechanism focusing on innovation, and improving the flexibility of talents allocation and flow systems, should be concerned.

Key words: indigenous innovation, innovative talent and team, policy correlativity analysis

CLC Number:

G301

Qu Wan, Mu Rongping, Shong Hefa. The policy correlativity for the development of innovative talents and teams[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(2): 40-47.

References

[1] Charles E. Lindblom. Policy Analysis [J]. The American Economic Review, 1958 (3): 298-312. [2] Richard Schwindt, Aidan R. Vining, David Weimer, A Policy Analysis of the BC Salmon Fishery[J], Canadian Public Policy. 2003, 29 (1): 73-93. [3] Vining, A. R., A. E. Boardman, et al. The choice of formal policy analysis methods in Canada. In Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett M., et al. Policy analysis in Canada: the state of the art [M]. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. [4] Carl Patton, David S. Sawicki, Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and Planning (2 edition) [M]. NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003. [5] 张守文.经济法的政策分析初探[J]. 法商研究,2003(5):94-102. [6] David L. Weimer, Aidan R. Vining. Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice (4th Edition) [M]. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2005 [7] Howlett, M. Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada [J]. Canadian Public Administration, 2009 (2): 153-175. [8] Sanderson, I. Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy Making [J]. Public administration, 2002 (1): 1-22. [9] Frank Fischer, Gerald Miller, Mara S. Sidney. Handbook of public policy analysis: theory, politics, and methods [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2007. [10] Davies, H. T. O., S. M. Nutley, et al. What works?: Evidence-based policy and practice in public services [M]. Bristol: Policy Press, 2007. [11] Colombo, A., K. S. Sultan, et al. Policy Research in a Complex Context [J]. Intelligent Information Management, 2010 (2): 619-630. [12] Blomquist, N. S. A General Equilibrium Model for Tax Policy Evaluation [J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1987(95): 1117-1119. [13] Willem Gunning, J. and M. A. Keyzer. Applied general equilibrium models for policy analysis1. In Chenery, H. B., T. N. Srinivasan, et al. Handbook of development economics [M]. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1995. [14] Agarwal, C., G. M. Green. A review and assessment of land-use change models: Dynamics of space, time and human choice . UFS Technicla Report NE-297, 2002. [15] Partridge, M. D. and D. S. Rickman. Computable general equilibrium (CGE) modelling for regional economic development analysis [J]. Regional Studies, 2010 (10): 1311-1328. [16] Narayanan, B. G., T. W. Hertel, et al. Disaggregated data and trade policy analysis: The value of linking partial and general equilibrium models [J]. Economic Modelling, 2010 (3): 755-766.