Business environment, financing structures and investment in innovation of family enterprises

Xin Jinguo, Cai Jingliang, Yang Chen, Guan Xiaoyong

Science Research Management ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 56-65.

PDF(1390 KB)
PDF(1390 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1) : 56-65.

Business environment, financing structures and investment in innovation of family enterprises

  • Xin Jinguo1, Cai Jingliang2, Yang Chen3, Guan Xiaoyong4
Author information +
History +

Abstract

     The current economy is at a critical point in the transformation from factor-driven pattern to innovation-driven pattern, and innovation capability has become a new standard to measure the level of economic development of a country. In recent years, China′s innovation capacity has continued to grow. And as an important carrier for implementing innovation activities, enterprises have been widely concerned about the improvement of their innovation capacity and the growth of investment in innovation. As an important player in China′s economic activities, the investment in innovation of private enterprises is directly related to whether China can fully realize industrial upgrading and high-quality development. However, according to the research and analysis report of China′s top 500 private enterprises, among the top 500 private enterprises in 2020, 62 enterprises have the R&D intensity of more than 3%, and 7 enterprises have that of more than 10%. It can be seen that China′s private enterprises lack a strong sense of innovation. And 80% of China′s private enterprises are family enterprises, an important part of private enterprises. They are of indispensable importance in the development of the national economy. It can be further inferred that the innovation problem of private enterprises is to a large extent the innovation problem of family enterprises. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find the crux of inhibiting the investment in innovation of family enterprises. Due to China′s credit market condition, the size of enterprises and the different financial institutions chosen can lead to different costs and efficiency of financial services. This will undoubtedly reduce the scope and amount of financing, affecting the investment in innovation of family enterprises. Therefore, financing is very important for family companies to invest in innovation. In addition, the business environment has received wide attention in recent years. It is closely related to enhancing the core competitiveness of regional development and stimulating regional innovation vitality. Therefore, the business environment and financing structure are important factors affecting the investment in innovation of family enterprises. 

      This paper takes 506 family enterprises during 2015-2018 as the research sample and uses panel regression models to explore the impact of different financing structures on family enterprises′ investment in innovation. The moderating role of business environment in the relationship between financing structure and family enterprises′ investment in innovation is also explored. The threshold model is also introduced to further discuss the differences in the impact of equity financing and debt financing on the investment in innovation of family enterprises under different business environment. It provides a reasonable reference for the innovation development of family enterprises for decision making.

      The main findings of this study are as follows: first, the impact of different financing methods on family enterprises′ investment in innovation is different. Equity financing is beneficial to the increase of family enterprises′ investment in innovation, while debt financing plays the opposite effect. For family enterprises, equity financing is more consistent than debt financing for firms to enhance their investment in innovation. Second, after adding the business environment factor, we find that there is a significant positive moderating effect of business environment in the relationship. On firms′ investment in innovation, a good business environment is conducive to enhancing the promotion effect of equity financing, and weakening the inhibiting effect of debt financing. Third, further analysis of the threshold effect reveals that the moderating effect is not significant when the level of business environment is low. When the business environment is relatively perfect, the business environment can play its positive moderating role in the relationship between equity financing, debt financing and investment in innovation.

        Finally, by combining the findings of this study, the author of this paper makes the following policy recommendations: first, the government needs to switch its functions. An orderly competition and perfect business environment is needed to alleviate the problem of difficult and high cost of enterprise financing, and guide more capital into the innovation field, such as improving the financing guarantee system; providing risk compensation and rule of law protection for financial institutions and stakeholders; building an all-round financial support system and a multi-level banking service system, and creating an effective risk identification and sharing mechanism as well as an information sharing mechanism among financial institutions. Second, family enterprises can moderately increase external financing, actively develop financing channels, adopt various financing methods to obtain funds for innovation projects and support investment in the innovation of enterprises.

Key words

family enterprises / business environment / financing structure / investment in innovation

Cite this article

Download Citations
Xin Jinguo, Cai Jingliang, Yang Chen, Guan Xiaoyong. Business environment, financing structures and investment in innovation of family enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2023, 44(1): 56-65

References

[1]林毅夫, 李永军. 中小金融机构发展与中小企业融资[J]. 经济研究, 2001(01): 10-18+53-93.
[2]徐浩, 张美莎. 营商环境、关系型融资与技术创新[J]. 当代财经, 2019(12): 73-83.
[3]Del Canto, Jesus Galende, Gonzalez, Isabel Suarez. A resource-based analysis of the factors determining a firm's R&D activities[J]. Research Policy, 1999, 28(08): 891-905.
[4]Bougheas S. Internal vs External Financing of R&D[J]. Small Business Economics, 2004, 22(01): 11-17.
[5]张璇, 刘贝贝, 汪婷, 李春涛. 信贷寻租、融资约束与企业创新[J]. 经济研究, 2017(05): 161-174.
[6]钱雪松, 康瑾, 唐英伦, 曹夏平. 产业政策、资本配置效率与企业全要素生产率—基于中国2009年十大产业振兴规划自然实验的经验研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(08): 42-59.
[7]张一林, 林毅夫, 龚 强. 企业规模、银行规模与最优银行业结构—基于新结构经济学的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2019(03): 31-47+206.
[8]Ughetto E. Does internal finance matter for R&D? New evidence from a panel of Italian firms[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2008, 32(06): 907-925.
[9]Magri, Silvia. The financing of small innovative firms: the Italian case[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2009, 18(02): 181-204.
[10]Li D, Ferreira M P. Is the 'international business environment' the actual context for IB research?[J]. Working Papers, 2009, 49(3):282-294.
[11]杨云峰, 樊丰. 我国科技型中小企业融资困境及其对策研究[J]. 科学管理研究, 2013, (02): 96-99.
[12]魏志华, 曾爱民, 李博. 金融生态环境与企业融资约束—基于中国上市公司的实证研究[J]. 会计研究, 2014, (05): 73-80.
[13]王怀明, 王钰. 金融生态环境、内部资本市场与融资约束[J]. 南京审计学院学报, 2018, 15(03): 11-20.
[14]Rainer Haselmann, Paul Wachtel. Institutions and Bank Behavior: Legal Environment, Legal Perception, and the Composition of Bank Lending[J]. Journal of Money Credit & Banking, 2010, 42(5): 965-984.
[15]Dtling F T, Kaufmann A. Innovation systems in regions of Europe - a comparative perspective[J]. European Planning Studies, 1999, 7(06): 699-717.
[16]Wang H, Qian C. Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: the roles of stakeholder response and political access[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(6): 1159-1181.
[17]吴炳德, 陈凌. 社会情感财富与研发投资组合:家族治理的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2014(8): 1233-1241.
[18]Sudheer Chava, Vikram K. Nanda, Steven Chong Xiao. Lending to Innovative Firms: The Role of Lender Expertise and Control Rights[J]. Ssrn Electronic Journal, 2013.
[19]任曙明, 王艳玲. 制度环境、政治关联与家族企业研发投入[J]. 软科学, 2017, (6): 91-95.
[20]夏杰长, 刘诚. 行政审批改革、交易费用与中国经济增长[J]. 管理世界, 2017(4): 47-59.
[21]夏后学, 谭清美, 白俊红. 营商环境、企业寻租与市场创新—来自中国企业营商环境调查的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(04): 84-98.
[22]何潇潇.河南省上市公司融资结构分析与优化对策[J].财务管理研究,2022(01):104-110.
[23]郭桂花, 王乃娣. 制度环境、融资结构与公司治理效率—基于我国上市家族企业的实证研究[J]. 财会月刊, 2015(08): 51-55.
[24]曹德骏. 家族企业研究的几个理论问题[J]. 财经科学, 2002(06): 55-60.
[25]黄玲, 林振兴. 从公司治理的角度看家族企业的竞争优势[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2010(11): 11-13.
[26]李新春,贺小刚,邹立凯.家族企业研究:理论进展与未来展望[J].管理世界,2020,36(11):207-229.DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2020.0178.
[27]Fermando. Business Environment[M]. Darling Kindersley Publications, 2011.
[28]杨学宁.优化营商环境 激发外资活力[J].中国外资,2021(23):48-50.
[29]姚曦.外部治理环境、公司特征与财务信息质量的实证分析[J].商业会计,2016(15):22-25.
[30]李汇东, 唐跃军, 左晶晶. 用自己的钱还是用别人的钱创新?—基于中国上市公司融资结构与公司创新的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2013, (2): 170-183.
[31]Chen Y M, Puttitanum T. Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation in Developing Countries[J]. Journal or Development Economics, 2005, 78(2): 474-493.
[32]俞红海, 徐龙炳, 陈百助. 终极控股股东控制权与自由现金流过度投资[J]. 经济研究, 2010, 45(08): 103-114.
[33]孙早, 肖利平. 融资结构与企业自主创新—来自中国战略性新兴产业A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2016(03): 45-58.
[34]李冲, 钟昌标, 徐旭, 龙帼琼. 基于 SGMM 模型的融资结构与公司创新关系: 理论分析与实证检验[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016, (15): 25-31.
[35]GRIFFITHS W, WEBSTER E. What governs firm-level R&D: Internal or external factors? [J]. Technology Innovation, 2010(30): 471-481.
[36]何晓斌, 柳建坤, 张云亮. 行政审批制度改革与企业创新投入[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(07): 40-49.
[37]吴延兵. 市场结构、产权结构与R&D—中国制造业的实证分析[J]. 统计研究, 2007(05): 67-75.
[38]徐侠, 陈圻, 郑兵云. 高技术产业R&D支出的影响因素研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2008(02): 304-310.
[39]JF Weston, EF Brigham. Managerial Finance[M]. NewYork: Drydenpress, 1970.
[40]李格非, 李卉. 金融环境论略[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2002(02): 147-150.
[41]龚兴军. 我国营商环境对企业创新的影响研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2019(02): 125-128.
[42]刘家树, 张娟. 股权融资对创新模式选择的影响效应研究—基于创新投入的中介作用[J]. 科学管理研究, 2019, 37(06): 105-112.
[43]李延喜, 陈克兢, 姚宏, 刘伶. 基于地区差异视角的外部治理环境与盈余管理关系研究—兼论公司治理的替代保护作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2012, 15(04): 89-100.
[44]姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017 (11): 128-142.
PDF(1390 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/