Does social trust help enterprises fulfill their social responsibilities?

Does social trust help enterprises fulfill their social responsibilities?

Yang Zhen, Ling Hongcheng, Chen Jin

Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 143-152.

PDF(388 KB)

PDF(388 KB)

Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 143-152.

Does social trust help enterprises fulfill their social responsibilities?

Yang Zhen^1,2, Ling Hongcheng³, Chen Jin^1,2

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The evolution process of corporate social responsibility has been nearly 100 years. It has gradually evolved from the necessity and legitimacy of social responsibility behavior whether or not to perform social responsibility to the rationality and social desirability of how to perform social responsibility better and sustainably, the concept of corporate social responsibility has also changed from the concept of moral charity based on businessmen, the concept of social response based on the pressure of stakeholders to the concept of tool competition based on strategic competition and the concept of social responsibility based on platform value co creation and sharing. In this sense, how to better drive enterprises to fulfill social responsibility and more sustainable performance of social responsibility has become a major practical topic of concern and research in academia and industry. From the existing research, although there are multiple perspectives to drive corporate social responsibility, including "from the outside to the inside" external institutional drive and external stakeholders drive, as well as "from the inside out" internal entrepreneurship and managers′ social responsibility cognition to drive corporate social responsibility.
However, from the perspective of institution theory, studies have neglected that informal institutional environment, as a "lubricant" in macroeconomic operation and micro enterprise market and social activities, plays an irreplaceable role in regulating enterprise market and social behavior. Although the existing research has focused on the important role of social trust in the market-oriented economic behaviors, such as financing constraints, risk-taking, M&A performance and enterprise innovation, there is a lack of attention on the corporate social responsibility behavior in the sense of corporate social attributes.
Based on A-share listed companies in China from 2009 to 2017, this paper empirically examines the impact of social trust on corporate social responsibility, and examines the regulatory effects of external formal system and internal executive incentive institution on social trust (informal system) and corporate social responsibility, and further verifies the corporate social responsibility under the guidance of tool competition logic in society the instrumental value effect between trust and enterprise innovation.
The results show that: (1) social trust has a significant positive impact on corporate social responsibility. Heterogeneity analysis shows that there are heterogeneity in property rights, disclosure environment and industry follow-up; (2) The external formal system (market-oriented environment) has a positive regulatory role between social trust and corporate social responsibility, showing a synergistic multiplier effect of formal system and informal system on corporate social responsibility; (3) The equity incentive system of executives in enterprises has a negative regulatory role between social trust and corporate social responsibility, showing the substitution effect of incentive system in enterprises and informal system outside enterprises on corporate social responsibility; (4) corporate social responsibility has a partial intermediary role between social trust and corporate innovation, that is, corporate social responsibility proposed by Porter and Kramer (2006). The effect of strategic competition tools is supported by empirical results.
This paper finds that the informal institutional environment plays an important role in driving corporate social responsibility, and confirms that the formal institutional environment and the internal incentive institutional environment play an important moderating role between the informal institutional environment and corporate social responsibility, and reveals that social trust is not only a "lubricant" of enterprise market behavior, but also a kind of "lubricant" to standard, incentive and governance corporate social responsibility, which is conducive to the formation of value reciprocal network relationship between enterprises and external stakeholders, and then drives the "moral orientation" and "social self-discipline" of enterprises.
Therefore, this paper enriches the research on the driving factors of corporate social responsibility at the theoretical level, especially bridging the shortcomings of the traditional "from outside to inside" external system driven and external stakeholders driven, as well as the "inside out" internal entrepreneurship and managers′ social responsibility awareness drive, and finally verifies the corporate social responsibility as a strategy competition tools can help enterprises obtain innovation resources and promote their innovation performance.

Key words

social trust / corporate social responsibility (CSR) / formal system / informal system / executive incentive / corporate innovation

Cite this article

Download Citations

Yang Zhen, Ling Hongcheng, Chen Jin. Does social trust help enterprises fulfill their social responsibilities?[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(5): 143-152

References

[1] 李伟阳,肖红军.基于社会资源优化配置视角的企业社会责任研究——兼对新古典经济学企业社会责任观的批判[J].中国工业经济,2009(4):116-126.

LI Weiyang, XIAO HongJun. CSR Research based on the perspective from Better Allocation of Social Resources——Criticizing Neoclassical Economics' Views on CSR[J].China Industrial Economics, 2009(4):116-126.

[2] 肖红军,阳镇.共益企业:社会责任实践的合意性组织范式[J].中国工业经济,2018(7):174-192.

XIAO Hongjun, YANG Zhen. Benefit Corporation:A Desirable Organizational Paradigm for CSR Practice[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(7):174-192.

[3]包英群,张慧玉,眭文娟.新创企业的制度嵌入与企业社会责任前移[J].科研管理,2017,38(06):100-107.

BAO Yingqun, ZHANG Huiyu,SUI Wenjuan. New firms' institutional embeddedness and forward movement of corporate social responsibilities [J]. Science Research Management, 2017,38(06):100-107.

[4] 阳镇,许英杰.企业社会责任治理:成因、模式与机制[J].南大商学评论,2017,14(4):145-174.

Yang Zhen, Xu Yingjie.Corporate social responsibility Governance: causes, models and mechanisms[J]. Nanjing Business Review,2017,14(4):145-174.

[5] 陈贵梧,胡辉华,陈林.行业协会提高了企业社会责任表现吗?——来自中国民营企业调查的微观证据[J].公共管理学报,2017,14(4):102-117+158.

Chen Guiwu, Hu Huihua, Chen Lin. Do Industrial Associations Improve Corporate Social Performance?——Evidence from China's Private Enterprises Survey[J]. Journal of Public Management, 2017,14(4):102-117+158.

[6] Stelios C., Zyglidopoulos S C, Georgiadis A P, Carroll C E, et al. Does media attention drive corporate social responsibility?[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2012, 65(11): 1622-1627.

[7] Xue-Lian C, Xia-Yang W, Hong-Hui C. Do managers really care about social responsibility??[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Social Science Edition),2018,58(1):196-208.

[8] 许年行,李哲.高管贫困经历与企业慈善捐赠[J].经济研究,2016,51(12):133-146.

Xu Nianxing, Li Zhe. CEOs’ Poverty Experience and Corporate Philanthropy. Economic Research Journal[J]. 2016,51(12):133-146.

[9] 陈冬华,胡晓莉,梁上坤,新夫.宗教传统与公司治理[J].经济研究,2013,48(9):71-84.

Chen Donghua, Hu Xiaoli, Liang Shangkun, Xin Fu. Religious Tradition and Corporate Governance[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2013,48(9):71-84..

[10] Porter M E, Kramer M R. Strategy and society:the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility[J].Harvard Business Review, 2006, 84 (12) :78-92.

[11] 张维迎，柯荣住．信任及其解释: 来自中国的跨省调查分析［J］．经济研究，2002，(10) : 59 -70+96.

Zhang Weiying, Ke Rongzhu. Trust in China: A Cross-Regional Analysis[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2002, 10(10) : 59 -70+96.

[12]王雪冬,匡海波,董大海.企业社会责任嵌入商业模式创新机理研究[J].科研管理,2019,40(05):47-56.

Wang Xuedong, Kuang Haibo, Dong Dahai. A research on the business model innovation through embedding corporate social responsibility [J]. Science Research Management, 2019,40(05):47-56.

[13] 辛杰.企业社会责任自律与型构:非正式制度的嵌入[J].当代财经,2014(5):81-90.

Xin Jie. Self-Discipline and Establishment of Corporate Social Responsibility: Embedding of Informal Institutions[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2014(5):81-90..

[14] 李维安,李汉军.股权结构、高管持股与公司绩效——来自民营上市公司的证据[J].南开管理评论,2006(05):4-10.

Li Wei'an, Li Hanjun. Ownership Structure, Executive Ownership and Performance: Evidence from Private Listed Firms in China[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2006, 9(5):4-10.

[15]李四海,陈旋,宋献中.穷则思“变”抑或穷则思“骗”?——基于业绩下滑企业业绩改善行为研究[J].研究与发展管理,2018,30(1):22-33.

Li Sihai, Chen Xuan, Song Xianzhong. Performance Decline Makes Firms Change or Cheat?——Research on Performance Improvement Behaviors of Performance Decline Enterprises[J]. R&D Management, 2018,30(1):22-33.

[16] Geletkanycz M A, Hambrick D C. The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997,42(4): 654-681.

[17] LI Z F, LI T, MINOR D. CEO Power, Corporate social responsibility, and Firm Value: A Test of Agency Theory[J].International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2015, 12(5): 611-628.

[18] Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L. Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009, 124(3) : 1095-1131．

[19] 申丹琳.社会信任与企业风险承担[J].经济管理,2019,41(8):147-161.

SHEN DanLin. Social Trust and Corporate Risk-Taking[J]. Business Management Journal,2019,41(8):147-161.

[20] Chen D, Li L, Liu X, et al. Social trust and auditor reporting conservatism[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 153(4): 1083-1108.

[21] Wu, W, M. Firth, and O．M. Rui. Trust and the Provision of Trade Credit[J].Journal of Banking & Finance, 2014, (39) :146-159．

[22] 权小锋,吴世农,尹洪英.企业社会责任与股价崩盘风险:“价值利器”或“自利工具”?[J].经济研究,2015,50(11):49-64.

Quan Xiaofeng, Wu Shinong, Yin Hongying. Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Price Crash Risk:Self-interest Tool or Value Strategy?[J].Economic Research Journal, 201550(11):49-64.

[23]刘宝华,罗宏,周微,杨行.社会信任与股价崩盘风险[J].财贸经济,2016(9):53-66.

Liu Baohua, Luo Hong, Zhou Wei, Yang Xing. Social Trust and Stock Crash Risk[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2016(9):53-66.

[24] 钱先航,曹春方.信用环境影响银行贷款组合吗——基于城市商业银行的实证研究[J].金融研究,2013(4):57-70.

Qian Xianhang, Cao Chunfang. Does credit environment affect bank loan portfolio -- An Empirical Study Based on City Commercial Banks[J]. Journal of Financial Research,2013(4):57-70.

[25] 王小鲁，樊纲，余静文.中国分省份市场化指数报告（2016）[M]. 北京：社会科学文献出版社，2017.

Wang Xiaolu, Fan Gang, Yu Jingwen. NERI INDEX of Marketization of China’s Provinces 2016 Report. Social Sciences Academic Press (China) ,2017.

[26] 朱德胜,周晓珮.股权制衡、高管持股与企业创新效率[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(3):136-144.

Zhu Desheng, Zhou Xiaopei. Equity Restriction, Managerial Ownership and Enterprise Innovation Efﬁciency[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2016,19(3):136-144.

[27] 凌鸿程,孙怡龙.社会信任提高了企业创新能力吗?[J].科学学研究,2019,37(10):1912-1920.

Ling Hongcheng, Sun Yilong. Can social trust improve corporate innovation ability? [J].Studies in Science of Science,2019,37(10):1912-1920.

[28] 潘越, 戴亦一, 吴超鹏, 等. 社会资本, 政治关系与公司投资决策[J].经济研究,2009,(11):82-94.

Pan Yue, Dai Yiyi, Wu Chaopeng,et al. Follow the Trend or the Opportunism: A Study on the Contagion Mechanism of Corporate Social Responsibility[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2009,(11):82-94.

[29] 刘柏,卢家锐.“顺应潮流”还是“投机取巧”:企业社会责任的传染机制研究[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(4):182-194.

Liu Bai, Lu Jiarui. Follow the Trend or the Opportunism: A Study on the Contagion Mechanism of Corporate Social Responsibility[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2018,21(4):182-194.

[30] Scott, W. R. Institutions and organizations[M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage ,2001.

[31] 肖红军,阳镇.多重制度逻辑下共益企业的成长:制度融合与响应战略[J].当代经济科学,2019,41(3):1-12.

Xiao Hongjun, Yang Zhen. Study on the Growth of the Benefit Corporation under Multiple Institutional Logics: Institutional Integration and Response Strategy[J]. Modern Economic Science,2019,41(3):1-12.

[32] 肖红军,阳镇.中国企业社会责任40年:历史演进、逻辑演化与未来展望[J].经济学家,2018(11):22-31.

Xiao Hongjun, Yang Zhen. 40 Years of Corporate Social Responsibility in China: Historical Evolution, Logical Evolution and Future Prospect[J]. Economist, 2018(11):22-31.

PDF(388 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections

Recommended

/

〈

〉