Science Research Management ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 100-111.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Wu Chong, Bo Siyi, Huang Caihong
Received:
2018-10-10
Revised:
2019-07-09
Online:
2021-02-20
Published:
2021-02-23
Wu Chong, Bo Siyi, Huang Caihong. The influence of joint ventures under institutional isomorphism on enterprises innovation performance#br#[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(2): 100-111.
[1] 盛伟忠, 陈劲. 企业互动学习与创新能力提升机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(9):4-13. Sheng Weizhong, Chen Jin. A research on mechanism of interactive learning and innovation capability upgrading[J]. Science research Management, 2018, 39(9):4-13. [1] Nell P C, Puck J, Heidenreich S. Strictly limited choice or agency? Institutional duality, legitimacy, and subsidiaries’ political strategies[J]. Journal of World Business, 2015, 50(2):302-311. [1] Hennart J F, Slangen A H L. Yes, we really do need more entry mode studies! A commentary on Shaver[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2015, 46(1): 114-122. [2] 魏江, 王诗翔, 杨洋. 向谁同构?中国跨国企业海外子公司对制度双元的响应[J]. 管理世界, 2016(10):134-149. Wei Jiang, Wang Shixiang, Yang Yang. Which environment to be isomorphism with? Responses of Sino-MNCs' foreign xubsidiaries to institutional duality [J]. Management World, 2016 (10):134-149. [3] Souitaris V, Zerbinati S, Liu G. Which iron cage? Endo-and exoisomorphism in corporate venture capital programs[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(2): 477-505. [4] 葛顺奇, 罗伟. 中国制造业企业对外直接投资和母公司竞争优势[J]. 管理世界, 2013(6):28-42. Ge Shunqi, Luo Wei. Foreign direct investment of Chinese manufacturing enterprises and competitive advantage of their parent companies[J]. Management World, 2013(6):28-42. [1] 陈立敏, 刘静雅, 张世蕾.模仿同构对企业国际化一绩效关系的影响:基于制度理论正当性视角的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经 济,2016(9):127-143. Chen Limin, Liu Jingya, Zhang Shilei. Influence of mimetic isomorphism on firms’ internationalization—performance relationship:An empirical study based on legitimacy perspective in institutional theory [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2016(9):127-143. [1] Davis P S, Desai A B, Francis J D. Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2000, 31(2):239-258. [1] Brouthers K D, Brouthers L E, Werner S. Transaction cost enhanced entry mode choices and firm Performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(12): 1239-1248. [1] Eriksson K, Johanson J, Majkgård A, et al. Experiential knowledge and costs in the internationalization process[J]. Journal of international business studies, 1997, 28(2): 337-360. [1] Tallman S, Fladmoe-Lindquist K. Internationalization, globalization, and capability-based strategy[J]. California Management Review, 2002, 45(1): 116. [2] Allen L, Pantzalis C. Valuation of the operating flexibility of multinational corporations[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1996, 27(4):633-653. [3] Deng P. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A critical review and future research[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2012, 14(4):408-427. [4] Singh J V, Tucker D J, House R J. Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31(2):171-193. [5] Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J A, et al. Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: volatility, crises and growth[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2002, 50(1):49-123. [6] Folta T B, Miller K D. Real options in equity partnerships[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 23(1):77-88. [7] Meyer, Klaus E. Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2001, 32(2):357-367. [8] Kostova T. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(2):308-324. [9] Estrin S, Baghdasaryan D, Meyer K E. The impact of institutional and human resource distance on international entry strategies[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2009, 46(7): 1171-1196. [1] Casillas J C, Moreno-Menéndez A M. Speed of the internationalization process: The role of diversity and depth in experiential learning[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2014, 45(1):85-101. [10] Kostova T, Zaheer S. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(1):64-81. [2] Brouthers, K D., Brouthers, L, Werner, S. Real options, international entry mode choice and performance[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45(5):936-960. [1] Dyer J H. Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 18(7):535-556. [2] 吴崇, 黄彩虹. 制度同构、创新区位与OFDI企业创新绩效[J].亚太经济, 2019(1):87-97. Wu Chong, Huang Caihong. Institutional isomorphism, innovative location and innovation performance of OFDI enterprises[J]. Asia-Pacific Economic Review, 2019 (1):87-97. [1] Prange C, Verdier S. Dynamic capabilities, internationalization processes and performance[J]. Journal of World Business, 2011, 46(1):126-133. [1] 高太山, 柳卸林. 企业国际研发联盟是否有助于突破性创新?[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(1):48-57. Gao Taishan, Liu Xielin. Do international R&D alliances really promote radical innovation?[J]. Science research Management, 2016, 37(1):48-57. [1] Wu J, Wang C, Hong J, et al. Internationalization and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: The role of host-country institutional development[J]. Journal of World Business, 2016, 51(2):251-263. [1] 徐娜娜, 徐雨森. 资源、创新网络与后发企业逆向创新的协同演化:基于海尔集团的纵向案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016, 28(6):216-228. Xu Nana, Xu Yusen. The co-evolutional mechanism on resource, innovation network and reverse innovation of latecomer enterprise: A research on Haier group [J]. Management Review, 2016, 28(6):216-228. [2] Shaver J M. Accounting for endogeneity when sssessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? [J]. Management Science, 1998, 44(4):571-585. [3] Hitt M A, Hoskisson R E, Kim H. International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversifiedFirms[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1997, 40(4):767-798. [4] Tihanyi L, GrifFith D A, Russell C J. The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2005, 36(3): 270-283. [5] 周铭山, 张倩倩. “面子工程”还是“真才实干”?:基于政治晋升激励下的国有企业创新研究[J]. 管理世界, 2016(12):116-132. Zhou Mingshan, Zhang Qianqian.“Face project ”or“ True talent” ? A research based on the relationship between political promotion incentive and innovation activity in state-owned listed companies [J]. Management World, 2016(12):116-132. [6] Child J, Rodrigues S B.The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension?[J]. Management & Organization Review, 2005, 1(3):381-410. [7] 温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰,刘红云. 中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报, 2004, 36(5): 614-620. Wen Zhonglin, Zhang Lei, Hou Jietai and Liu Hongyun. Testing and application of the mediating effects [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2004, 36(5):614-620. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||