A study of complementarities between internal R&D and external R&D in enterprises' innovation management: A data analysisbased on China's large and medium-sized enterprises data

Liu Keyin, Xuan Yong, Chi Renyong

Science Research Management ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4) : 11-21.

PDF(1 KB)
PDF(1 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4) : 11-21.

A study of complementarities between internal R&D and external R&D in enterprises' innovation management: A data analysisbased on China's large and medium-sized enterprises data

  • Liu Keyin1,2, Xuan Yong3, Chi Renyong1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Although many management consultants suggest that enterprises can outsource some technology developing activities, but the nature of effects and the conditions between internal R&D and external technology acquisitions are poorly understood. This paper constructs an innovation production translog function, and we apply the innovation input-output data of large and medium-sized industrial enterprises in China's 31 provinces to test the complementarities between internal R&D and external R&D. The research results show that, when the enterprise has stronger ability to absorb technology, large economies of scale and the technology transfer experiences, the degree of complementarities between internal and external R&D is strong. The results also show that enterprise's R&D investment (technology development) and external technology purchasing are substitutability. It shows that the substitution and complementarities of external technology are different at enterprise's different stages and different forms of technical activities.

Key words

internal R&D / external R&D / substitutability / complementarities

Cite this article

Download Citations
Liu Keyin, Xuan Yong, Chi Renyong. A study of complementarities between internal R&D and external R&D in enterprises' innovation management: A data analysisbased on China's large and medium-sized enterprises data[J]. Science Research Management. 2015, 36(4): 11-21

References

[1] Chesbrough H.W. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003:7-9. [2] Cassiman B., Veugelers R. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external technology acquisition[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(1):68–82. [3] Lokshin B., Belderbos R., Carree M. The productivity effects of internal and external R&D: evidence from a dynamic panel data model[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2008, 70(3):399–413. [4] Vega-Jurado J., Gutiérrez-Gracia A., Fernández-de-Lucio I. Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2009, 18(4):637–670. [5] Hagedoorna, John, Wang, Ning.Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies?[J].Research Policy, 2012, 41(6):1072–1083. [6] 樊霞,何悦,朱桂龙.产学研合作与企业内部研发的互补性关系研究——基于广东省部产学研合作的实证[J].科学学研究,2011,29(5):764-770.Fan Xia,He Yue,Zhu Guilong. Research on complementarity between university-industry cooperation and enterprise internal R&D:Based on the empirical research of cooperation in Guangdong province and department[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2011,29(5):764-770. [7] Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization[J]. American Economic Review, 1990,80(3):511-528. [8] Hoang H., Rothaermel F.T. Leveraging internal and external experience: Exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31 (7): 734-758. [9] Ceccagnoli M., Graham M., Higginsy M., Lee J. Productivity and the role of complementary assets in firms' demand for technology innovations[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2010,19(3):839-869.
PDF(1 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/