研发费用加计扣除政策对中小企业高质量创新的影响

田红云, 李永友, 李忠正

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 53-63.

PDF(1106 KB)
PDF(1106 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 53-63. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.03.006

研发费用加计扣除政策对中小企业高质量创新的影响

作者信息 +

Impact of pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure on high quality innovation of SMEs

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

探讨研发费用加计扣除政策对中小企业创新绩效影响的文献较为缺乏,且忽视了企业内部因素。基于A股上市公司的数据,以中小企业为研究对象,将创新绩效划分为数量和质量两个维度,构建企业创业导向调节研发费用加计扣除政策与创新绩效关系的概念模型。运用门限回归法探究不同创业导向区间内研发费用加计扣除受惠强度对企业创新绩效的激励效应。实证结果表明:中小企业研发费用加计扣除受惠强度对创新数量和创新质量具有显著正向影响;创业导向对研发费用加计扣除政策的实施效果具有调节作用,且创业导向的调节作用存在门限效应;当创业导向处于较低区间时,研发费用加计扣除政策受惠强度的提高反而会降低创新质量;当创业导向处于较高区间时,研发费用加计扣除政策受惠强度对企业创新质量的激励效果最优;创业导向的调节效应存在行业异质性。基于上述研究结论,建议进一步提升研发费用加计扣除的比例并与鼓励创业导向的政策配套实施;根据不同的创业导向水平和不同行业制定差异化的优惠政策。本文从企业内在因素这一新视角探讨了研发费用加计扣除政策的实施效果,揭示了政策实施过程中企业产生机会主义行为的深层原因,并为提升研发费用加计扣除政策实施的有效性和精准性提供了思路和借鉴。

Abstract

The existing literature on the impact of the pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure on enterprise innovation performance has often overlooked the SMEs, and the impact of internal factors has been ignored. Based on the data from A-share listed companies, this study focused on SMEs as the research object, divided innovation performance into two dimensions: quantity and quality, and constructed a conceptual model of the relationship between the pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure and innovation performance which is moderated by entrepreneurial orientation. Then the threshold regression method was used to test the incentive effects of the pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure on enterprise innovation performance during the different intervals of entrepreneurial orientation.
The empirical results indicated that: first, the benefits intensity of the pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure has a significant positive effect on the SMEs' innovation quantity and quality. Second, entrepreneurial orientation significantly moderates the incentive effect of the pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure on SMEs' innovation quality. Notably, there exist threshold effects in this moderation of the entrepreneurial orientation. When the value of entrepreneurial orientation lies in the lower range, the increase of the benefits intensity of the pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure will lead to a decrease in innovation quality. However, when the value of entrepreneurial orientation lies in the higher range, the incentive effect of pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure on enterprise innovation quality is optimal. Third, there exists an industrial discrepancy in the moderating effect of entrepreneurial orientation. Based on the above research conclusions, this paper proposed to increase the proportion of the pretax additional deduction for R&D expenditure in conjunction with the policies of encouraging entrepreneurial orientation, establish a screening mechanism for the entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs and formulate differentiated preferential policies according to different entrepreneurial orientation levels and different industries.
This paper explored the practical effect of the pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure from a new perspective of internal factors, and revealed the underlying reasons for opportunistic behavior of enterprises during the policy implementation process. The research results will provide insights and references for improving the effectiveness and precision of the pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure.

关键词

创业导向 / 创新质量 / 研发费用加计扣除 / 中小企业

Key words

innovation orientation / innovation quality / pretax additional deduction of R&D expenditure / small and medium-sized enterprise (SME)

引用本文

导出引用
田红云, 李永友, 李忠正. 研发费用加计扣除政策对中小企业高质量创新的影响[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(3): 53-63 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.03.006
Tian Hongyun, Li Yongyou, Li Zhongzheng. Impact of pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure on high quality innovation of SMEs[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(3): 53-63 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.03.006
中图分类号: F273.1   

参考文献

[1]
傅俊英, 彭喆, 郑佳, 等. 基于专利异构网络的中小企业潜在合作伙伴研究:以石墨烯领域为例[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(04):391-401.
FU Junying, PENG Zhe, ZHENG Jia, et al. Exploring potential collaboration partners of middle and small-sized enterprises based on heterogeneous information networks of patent: Graphene as example[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2019, 38(4): 391-401.
[2]
李刚, 牛冲槐. 研发费用加计扣除新政激励效应研究:基于创业板上市公司的经验数据[J]. 税务研究, 2018(3):81-85.
LI Gang, NIU Chonghuai. Research on the incentive effect of new policies for the pretax additional deduction for R&D expenditure: Based on empirical data of the GEM listed companies[J]. Taxation Research, 2018(3):81-85.
[3]
冯泽, 陈凯华, 戴小勇. 研发费用加计扣除是否提升了企业创新能力?:创新链全视角[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(10):73-86.
FENG Ze, CHEN Kaihua, DAI Xiaoyong. Does the weighted tax deduction for R&D costs promote firms' innovative capability? The full perspective of innovation chain[J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(10):73-86.
[4]
万源星, 许永斌, 许文瀚. 加计扣除政策、研发操纵与民营企业自主创新[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(2):83-93.
WAN Yuanxing, XU Yongbin, XU Wenhan. Additional deduction policy, R&D manipulation and independent innovation of private firms[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(2): 83-93.
[5]
黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?:宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4):60-73.
LI Wenjing, ZHENG Manni. Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation? Impact of macroeconomic policies on micro-enterprises' innovation[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, 51(4):60-73.
[6]
杨国超, 芮萌. 高新技术企业税收减免政策的激励效应与迎合效应[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(9):174-191.
YANG Guochao, RUI Meng. The incentive effect and catering effect of tax-reducing policy for high-tech enterprises[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2020, 55(9):174-191.
[7]
王登礼, 赖先进, 郭京京. 研发费加计扣除政策的税收激励效应:以战略性新兴产业为例[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(10):3-12.
WANG Dengli, LAI Xianjin, GUO Jingjing. Tax incentive effect of R&D expense super deduction policy: Empirical evidence from listed companies in strategic emerging industries[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 2018, 39(10): 3-12.
[8]
贺康, 王运陈, 张立光, 等. 税收优惠、创新产出与创新效率:基于研发费用加计扣除政策的实证检验[J]. 华东经济管理, 2020, 34(1):37-48.
HE Kang, WANG Yunchen, ZHANG Liguang, et al. Tax preferences, innovation output and innovation efficiency: Based on R&D expense super deduction policy[J]. East China Economic Management, 2020, 34(1):37-48.
[9]
IVUSA O, JOSEB M, SHARMA R. R&D tax credit and innovation: Evidence from private firms in India[J]. Research Policy, 2021, 51(2):1-7.
[10]
CHEN L, YANG W. R&D tax credits and firm innovation: Evidence from China[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2019 (146):233-246.
[11]
王玺, 刘萌. 研发费用加计扣除政策对企业绩效的影响研究:基于我国上市公司的实证分析[J]. 财政研究, 2020(11):101-114.
WANG Xi, LIU Meng. Research on the impact of R&D expense additional deduction policy on firm performance: An empirical analysis based on listed companies in China[J]. Public Finance Research, 2020(11):101-114.
[12]
朱浩, 李林, 魏琪. 繁荣的专利申请能否改善企业绩效?:基于不同创业导向的门限实证研究[J]. 软科学, 2020, 34(7):121-129.
ZHU Hao, LI Lin, WEI Qi. The more patent applications, the better financial performance of enterprises? An empirical study of threshold model based on innovation strategic orientation differences[J]. Soft Science, 2020, 34(7):121-129.
[13]
WALES W J, GUPTA V K, MOUSA F T. Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: An assessment and suggestions for future research[J]. International Small Business Journal, 2013, 31(4):357-383.
Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) is one of the most widely accepted firm-level constructs in the literature. The present study provides a comprehensive qualitative review and evaluation of the empirical EO literature. It finds that EO research has made considerable strides in recent years and is accelerating and broadening, although notable biases and inconsistencies in variable choice and model specification remain. The article sheds light on the popularity of Miller’s unidimensional conceptualization of EO, as well as the rise in multidimensional explorations of the phenomenon. It concludes with a discussion of the implications of the study’s findings for EO-related research and practice.
[14]
王遂昆, 郝继伟. 政府补贴、税收与企业研发创新绩效关系研究:基于深圳中小板上市企业的经验证据[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2014, 31(9):92-96.
摘要
在市场机制不完善的新兴市场经济国家,中小企业研发创新中政府的引导作用十分必要。选取2007-2012年深市进行研发创新的中小企业作为分析对象,利用多元回归模型研究了政府科技政策对中小企业研发创新的影响。实证结果表明:政府创新补贴和税收支持在促进中小企业研发创新方面起到了积极作用;与国有企业相比,政府补贴对中小企业研发创新的促进效应更大。最后,针对这些问题,进一步分析了原因并提出了相应的对策。
WANG Suikun, HAO Jiwei. Research on the relationship of government funding, tax policy and technological innovation-based on growth enterprise market empirical evidence[J]. Science &Technology Progress and Policy, 2014, 31(9):92-96.
[15]
包月红, 赵芝俊. 专利保护和加计扣除能促进私人农业研发么?[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(12):163-171.
BAO Yuehong, ZHAO Zhijun. Can patent and tax deduction inspire private agricultural R&D?[J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(12):163-171.
[16]
李新, 汤恒运, 陶东杰, 等. 研发费用加计扣除政策对企业研发投入的影响研究:来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2019(8):81-93+169.
LI Xin, TANG Hengyun, TAO Dongjie, et al. Research on the impact of R&D expenses additional deduction policy on enterprises R&D investment: Evidence from Chinese listed company[J]. Macroeconomics, 2019(08):81-93+169.
[17]
杜千卉, 张玉臣. 政府支持对工业企业技术获取策略的差异性影响:基于不同类型创新激励政策的比较研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020(5):15-23.
DU Qianhui, ZHANG Yuchen. The differential effects of governmental support policies on technology acquisition strategies of industrial enterprises: A comparative analysis based on different types of innovation incentive policies[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2020(5):15-23.
[18]
李子彪, 孙可远, 吕鲲鹏. 三类政府财政激励政策对高新技术企业创新绩效的激励机制:基于企业所有权性质的调节效应[J]. 技术经济, 2018, 37(12):14-25+75.
LI Zibiao, SUN Keyuan, LYU Kunpeng. Incentive mechanism of three types of government financial incentive to innovation performance of high-tech enterprises: Based on moderating effect of firm's ownership[J]. Technology Economic, 2018, 37(12):14-25+75.
[19]
贾明琪, 张宇璐. 软件信息业研发投入、研发费用加计扣除与企业绩效实证研发[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2017, 34(18):51-58.
摘要
选取上海、深圳证券市场软件信息业171家高新技术企业2012-2015年的相关数据,针对研发投入、研发费用加计扣除与企业绩效三者间的关系进行研究。结果表明,研发费用加计扣除与研发投入和企业绩效显著正相关,加计扣除政策实施效果较好,政府应给予企业更多的加计扣除优惠;根据面板数据模型估计结果,研发投入与企业绩效存在非线性关系,研发投入对当期绩效的抑制作用不明显,对滞后一期绩效有显著抑制作用,对滞后两期绩效正向作用不明显。研发投入经济效益回收存在一定的滞后性,根据分位数回归结果,处于50%分位点的企业研发投入对企业绩效的正向作用最大;分组回归结果显示,研发费用加计扣除优惠对研发投入与企业绩效的关系具有正向调节作用。
JIA Mingqi, ZHANG Yulu. An empirical study on relationships among R&D investment, the preferential policy of R&D costs deduction and firm performance in software information industry[J]. Science &Technology Progress and Policy, 2017, 34(18):51-58.
[20]
李丽青. 我国现行R&D税收优惠政策的有效性研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2007(7):115-120.
LI Liqing. The effectiveness of current tax incentives on enterprise' R&D investment in China[J]. China Soft Science, 2007(7): 115-120.
[21]
宋清, 魏雪. 融资约束、加计扣除优惠强度与研发投入实证研究:基于创业板上市公司数据[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018(11):106-115+157.
SONG Qing, WEI Xue. An empirical study on financing constraints,R&D deduction intensity and R&D investment: Based on the data of the GEM listed companies[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2018(11): 106-115+157.
[22]
JIA Junxue, MA Guangrong. Do R&D tax incentives work? Firm-level evidence from China[J]. China Economic Review, 2017, 46(C):50-66.
[23]
刘诗源, 林志帆, 冷志鹏. 税收激励提高企业创新水平了吗?:基于企业生命周期理论的检验[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(6):105-121.
LIU Shiyuan, LIN Zhifan, LENG Zhipeng. Whether tax incentives stimulate corporate innovation: Empirical evidence based on corporate life cycle theory[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2020, 55(6):105-121.
[24]
FERREIRA J, COELHO A, MOUTINHO L. Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation[J]. Technovation, 2018(92-93):1-18.
[25]
ALJANABI A, QADIR A, NOR R, et al. The mediating role of market orientation on entrepreneurial orientation, absorptive capacity and technological innovation capabilities[J]. Asian Social Science, 2015, 11(5):219-234.
<p>The main purpose of the study is to investigate if there is any significant relationship between Strategic Leadership Characteristics of Maldivian school leaders and their Leadership Self-efficacy. The study employed a survey approach and the data were collected using an adapted seven point Likert scale survey questionnaire. Data were collected from 23 schools in the capital city Male’, Republic of Maldives. A total of 200 school leaders (45 males and 155 females) participated in the study. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation and Structural Equation Modeling. The findings of the study revealed that the school leaders in Male’ possessed all nine characteristics of strategic leadership. It also indicated that school leaders’ in Male’ have quite a bit of control in their roles as school leaders, revealing a high perception level of self-efficacy. Moreover, the results of the correlation analysis and examination of path analysis indicated that there was statistically significant and positive relationship between Strategic Leadership Characteristics of Maldivian school leaders and their Leadership Self-efficacy. The present study provides a starting-point for further exploring the strategic leadership qualities and self-efficacy of school leaders which are vital to bring a positive reform in schools. This study highlights that executing strategic leadership is essential to deal with both the need for sustainable change. It further indicates that both self-efficacy and strategic leadership are important to school leaders’ as they affect performance of the leaders through different mechanisms.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Strategic leadership; leadership self efficacy; Maldives school leaders; structural equation modeling.</p>
[26]
李悦. 组织创业导向的内涵及其对组织创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2012(12):5-10.
LI Yue. Conceptualization of organizational innovation orientation and its impacts on organizational innovation performance[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2012(12):5-10.
[27]
韩晨, 谢言, 高山行. 多重战略导向与企业创新绩效:一个被调节的中介效应模型[J]. 管理工程学报, 2020, 34(06):29-37.
HAN Chen, XIE Yan, GAO Shanxing. Multiple strategic orientations and firm innovative performance: A moderated mediation model[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2020, 34(06):29-37.
[28]
ZORTEA-Johnston E, DARROCH J, MATEAR S. Business orientations and innovation in small and medium sized enterprises[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2012, 8(2):145-164.
[29]
郑玉. 政府补贴的创新效应:兼论不同类型创新的最适补贴区间[J]. 经济经纬, 2020, 37(4):142-149.
ZHENG Yu. The innovation effect of government subsidy: A discussion on the optimal subsidy interval of different types of innovation[J]. Economic Survey, 2020, 37(4):142-149.
[30]
SHORT J C, BROBERG J C, COGLISER C C, et al. Construct validation using computer aided text analysis (CATA) an illustration using entrepreneurial orientation[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2010, 13(2):320-347.
Construct validity continues to pose challenges in the organizational sciences. To capture difficult-to-measure constructs of interest, researchers have often relied on content analysis. One content analysis technique, computer-aided text analysis (CATA), is particularly attractive because of the ability to process large samples with high speeds and reliabilities. Unfortunately, inconsistent guidance exists to guide researchers through the use of this tool in a manner compatible with accepted methods used to validate constructs in a rigorous manner. The authors review research using content analysis to examine the extent to which such studies integrate methods for assessing content, external, discriminant, and predictive validity. To provide direction for organizational researchers interested in using CATA to measure theoretically based constructs relevant to the management field, they suggest a number of possible procedures to enhance construct validity. They illustrate these procedures using the construct of entrepreneurial orientation.
[31]
王业静, 刘勇, 单鹏. 创业导向对企业战略重心的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(7):1263-1273.
摘要
研究基于期望价值理论,从创业导向视角探索企业战略重心的形成机理,并结合权力理论和高阶理论,从高管权力与高管团队异质性方面挖掘创业导向对企业战略重心影响的边际价值。研究通过理论推演提出假设及研究模型,以生物医药制造业上市公司为样本构建多源、多年数据集,采用多层回归模型分析及稳健性测试对假设进行检验。研究结果显示,(1)创业导向能够有效促使企业战略重心向价值创造偏移。(2)高管权力与高管团队年龄队异质性均对创业导向与企业战略重心之间的正向关系具有强化作用。(3)高管权力具有二次调节作用,当高管权力较大时,高管团队年龄异质性对创业导向与企业战略重心关系的积极调节效应更加强烈。研究揭示了创业导向对企业战略重心形成影响的内在机理与动态过程,为创业导向在企业层面的应用和战略重心决策管理实践提供参考依据。
WANG Yejing, LIU Yong, SHAN Peng. Research on the influence of entrepreneurial orientation on firm's strategic emphasis[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2022, 40(07): 1263-1273.
[32]
FERRERAS-Méndez J L, OLMOS-Peñuela J, SALAS-Vallina A, et al. Entrepreneurial orientation and new product development performance in SMEs: The mediating role of business model innovation[J]. Technovation, 2021,102325.
[33]
葛宝山, 赵丽仪. 创业导向如何影响专精特新企业绩效?:创业拼凑和组织韧性的多重中介作用[J/OL]. 科学学研究,https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20230316.001
GE Baoshan, ZHAO Liyi. How does entrepreneurial orientation affect the performance of SRDI enterprises? The chain mediating effect of entrepreneurial bricolage and organizational resilience[J/OL]. Studies in Science of Science, https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20230316.001
[34]
王芸, 陈蕾. 研发费用加计扣除优惠强度、研发投入强度与企业价值[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016, 36(5):18-22+29.
WANG Yun, CHEN Lei. R&D deduction intensity, R&D intensity and firm value[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2016, 36(5):18-22+29.
[35]
任海云, 宋伟宸. 企业异质性因素、研发费用加计扣除与 R&D 投入[J]. 科学学研究, 2017(8):1232-1239.
摘要
以中国制造业上市公司为样本,实证检验了研发费用加计扣除政策对企业R&D投入的激励效果,并考察了激励效果是否与企业所处竞争环境、企业规模、企业所处生命周期阶段及行业特征等企业异质性因素有关。结果表明:(1)加计扣除政策起到了预期效果,整体上促进了上市公司研发投入;(2)加计扣除政策的激励效果与企业所处生命周期、企业行业特征及企业所处外部市场环境有关,对成熟期企业的激励效果最好,对高技术行业的企业激励效果不及低技术行业的企业明显,市场化程度越高,加计扣除政策激励效果越差。
REN Haiyun, SONG Weichen. Firm heterogeneity, additional deduction policy and R&D investment[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2017(8):1232-1239.
Using Chinese listed manufacturing firms' data, this paper empirically examines the incentive effect of R&D additional deduction policy on firm&rsquo;s R&D investments and verifies whether the incentive effect is related with firm heterogeneity such as market competition environment, firm size, firm life cycle stage and industry characteristics. The results are as follows: (1) Additional deduction policy has a positive effect on firm R&D input. (2)The incentive effect doses vary across firm life cycles, industry characteristics and. It&rsquo;s better for mature firms and low-tech enterprises and the higher for the marketization degree, the worse is the inventive effect.
[36]
薛薇, 魏世杰, 李峰. 由国际经验我国研发费用加计扣除政策的完善[J]. 国际税收, 2014(11):14-18.
XUE Wei, WEI Shijie, LI Feng. Improving China's additional deduction policy of R&D expenditure: From the perspective of international experience[J]. International Taxation in China, 2014(11):14-18.
[37]
戴维奇, 赵慢. 企业家新政感知、制度与创业导向[J]. 科研管理, 2022(9):187-196.
DAI Weiqi, ZHAO Man. A research on the relationship among private entrepreneurs' perceptions of new policies,institutions and entrepreneurial orientation[J]. Science Research Management, 2022(9): 187-196.

基金

国家社会科学基金一般项目:“大数据驱动的平台型企业跨界颠覆性创新机理及对策研究”(21BGL069)
国家社会科学基金一般项目:“大数据驱动的平台型企业跨界颠覆性创新机理及对策研究”(2021.09—2024.12)
国家社会科学基金重大招标项目:“三期叠加下统筹稳增长、促转型和防风险的积极财政政策提质增效研究”(20&ZD080)
国家社会科学基金重大招标项目:“三期叠加下统筹稳增长、促转型和防风险的积极财政政策提质增效研究”(2020.01—2023.11)

PDF(1106 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/