PDF(1199 KB)
PDF(1199 KB)
PDF(1199 KB)
数量或质量:环境信息披露对绿色创新的影响
Quantity or quality: The impact of environmental information disclosure on green innovation
绿色创新是“实现经济发展、减少污染”双赢目标的关键。本文以沪深A股重污染上市公司为样本,从“数量”和“质量”两个视角出发,并结合中介效应模型和调节效应模型,考察环境信息披露对绿色创新的影响。研究发现:环境信息披露在推动绿色创新数量提高的同时,对绿色创新质量产生了抑制效应。作用机制方面,环境信息披露对数量和质量的不同影响是通过诱发企业短期化行为传递的。进一步分析显示,提高管理层能力和加大长期机构投资者持股比例能够对企业绿色创新短期化行为进行纠偏。本文的研究有助于更为全面地理解环境信息披露与绿色创新之间的逻辑关系,并为政府环境治理机制的进一步优化以及提升企业核心竞争力提供实践证据。
Green innovation is the key to achieving the win-win goal of fostering economic development and reducing environmental pollution. This paper innovatively took the "green innovation quantity" and "green innovation quality" as different representations of the green innovation. On this basis, we took China's Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share heavy polluting listed companies as a sample, and studied the impact of environmental information disclosure on firms' green innovation by using the mediating effect model and moderating effect model. The results showed that: (1) Environmental information disclosure forces the listed companies to increase the number of green innovations, but reduces the quality of green innovation. This conclusion is still valid after a series of robustness tests. (2) Environmental information disclosure exacerbates short-termism, which crowds out high-quality green innovations. (3) Improving the management ability and increasing the shareholding ratio of long-term institutional investors can correct the green innovation formalism of enterprises. Our results will not only contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the logical relationship between environmental information disclosure and green innovation, but also provide practical evidence for further optimization of environmental governance and promotion of enterprises' core competitive capability.
environmental information disclosure / innovation quality / innovation quantity / green innovation
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
熊广勤, 石大千, 李美娜. 低碳城市试点对企业绿色技术创新的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(12): 93-102.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
陈宇科, 刘蓝天, 董景荣. 环境规制工具、区域差异与企业绿色技术创新:基于系统GMM和动态门槛的中国省级数据分析[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(4): 111-118.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
王营, 冯佳浩. 政府环境信息公开的绿色创新效应研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(6): 117-125.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
许林, 林思宜, 钱淑芳. 环境信息披露、绿色技术创新对融资约束的缓释效应[J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(9): 23-33.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
竺李乐, 吴福象, 范衍玮. “专利泡沫”与“创新假象”:国有企业民营化改革及其真实创新产出[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2021, 43(12): 82-95.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?:宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4): 60-73.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
张杰, 郑文平. 创新追赶战略抑制了中国专利质量么?[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(5): 28-41.
|
| [23] |
蔡春, 郑开放, 陈晔, 等. 政府环境审计对企业环境责任信息披露的影响研究:基于“三河三湖”环境审计的经验证据[J]. 审计研究, 2019(6): 3-12.
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
李哲, 王文翰. “多言寡行”的环境责任表现能否影响银行信贷获取:基于“言”和“行”双维度的文本分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021(12): 116-132.
|
| [26] |
刘金科, 肖翊阳. 中国环境保护税与绿色创新:杠杆效应还是挤出效应?[J]. 经济研究, 2022, 57(1): 72-88.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
曹虹剑, 张帅, 欧阳峣, 等. 创新政策与“专精特新”中小企业创新质量[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(11): 135-154.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
胡楠, 薛付婧, 王昊楠. 管理者短视主义影响企业长期投资吗?:基于文本分析和机器学习[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5): 139-156+11+19-21.
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |