数量或质量:环境信息披露对绿色创新的影响

刘祎, 尹云龙, 杨旭

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4) : 166-174.

PDF(1199 KB)
PDF(1199 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4) : 166-174. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.04.018

数量或质量:环境信息披露对绿色创新的影响

作者信息 +

Quantity or quality: The impact of environmental information disclosure on green innovation

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

绿色创新是“实现经济发展、减少污染”双赢目标的关键。本文以沪深A股重污染上市公司为样本,从“数量”和“质量”两个视角出发,并结合中介效应模型和调节效应模型,考察环境信息披露对绿色创新的影响。研究发现:环境信息披露在推动绿色创新数量提高的同时,对绿色创新质量产生了抑制效应。作用机制方面,环境信息披露对数量和质量的不同影响是通过诱发企业短期化行为传递的。进一步分析显示,提高管理层能力和加大长期机构投资者持股比例能够对企业绿色创新短期化行为进行纠偏。本文的研究有助于更为全面地理解环境信息披露与绿色创新之间的逻辑关系,并为政府环境治理机制的进一步优化以及提升企业核心竞争力提供实践证据。

Abstract

Green innovation is the key to achieving the win-win goal of fostering economic development and reducing environmental pollution. This paper innovatively took the "green innovation quantity" and "green innovation quality" as different representations of the green innovation. On this basis, we took China's Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share heavy polluting listed companies as a sample, and studied the impact of environmental information disclosure on firms' green innovation by using the mediating effect model and moderating effect model. The results showed that: (1) Environmental information disclosure forces the listed companies to increase the number of green innovations, but reduces the quality of green innovation. This conclusion is still valid after a series of robustness tests. (2) Environmental information disclosure exacerbates short-termism, which crowds out high-quality green innovations. (3) Improving the management ability and increasing the shareholding ratio of long-term institutional investors can correct the green innovation formalism of enterprises. Our results will not only contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the logical relationship between environmental information disclosure and green innovation, but also provide practical evidence for further optimization of environmental governance and promotion of enterprises' core competitive capability.

关键词

环境信息披露 / 创新质量 / 创新数量 / 绿色创新

Key words

environmental information disclosure / innovation quality / innovation quantity / green innovation

引用本文

导出引用
刘祎, 尹云龙, 杨旭. 数量或质量:环境信息披露对绿色创新的影响[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(4): 166-174 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.04.018
Liu Yi, Yin Yunlong, Yang Xu. Quantity or quality: The impact of environmental information disclosure on green innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(4): 166-174 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.04.018
中图分类号: F273.4   

参考文献

[1]
HUANG X, LIU W, ZHANG Z, et al. Quantity or quality: Environmental legislation and corporate green innovations[J]. Ecological Economics, 2023, 204(PB): 107684.
[2]
JIANG LI, BAI YU. Strategic or substantive innovation? The impact of institutional investors' site visits on green innovation evidence from China[J]. Technology in Society, 2022, 68: 101904.
[3]
DING J, LU Z, YU C H. Environmental information disclosure and firms' green innovation: Evidence from China[J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2022, 81: 147-159.
[4]
PETRONI G, BIGLIARDI B, GALATI F. Rethinking the Porter hypothesis: The underappreciated importance of value appropriation and pollution intensity[J]. Review of Policy Research, 2019, 36(1): 121-140.
[5]
LUO Y, SALMAN M, LU Z. Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulations and foreign direct investment on green innovation across different regions in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 759: 143744.
[6]
SHANG L, TAN D, FENG S, et al. Environmental regulation, import trade, and green technology innovation[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29(9): 12864-12874.
[7]
熊广勤, 石大千, 李美娜. 低碳城市试点对企业绿色技术创新的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(12): 93-102.
XIONG Guangqin, SHI Daqian, LI Meina. The effect of low-carbon pilot cities on the green technology innovation of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(12): 93-102.
[8]
XU Y, LIU S, WANG J. Impact of environmental regulation intensity on green innovation efficiency in the Yellow River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 373: 133789.
[9]
BLACKMAN A, LI Z, LIU A A. Efficacy of command-and-control and market-based environmental regulation in developing countries[J]. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2018, 10: 381-404.
[10]
陈宇科, 刘蓝天, 董景荣. 环境规制工具、区域差异与企业绿色技术创新:基于系统GMM和动态门槛的中国省级数据分析[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(4): 111-118.
CHEN Yuke, LIU Lantian, DONG Jingrong. Environmental regulation tools, regional differences and green technology innovation of enterprises: An analysis of China's provincial panel data based on the system GMM and dynamic threshold[J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(4): 111-118.
[11]
LUO Y, SALMAN M, LU Z. Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulations and foreign direct investment on green innovation across different regions in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 759: 143744.
[12]
王营, 冯佳浩. 政府环境信息公开的绿色创新效应研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(6): 117-125.
WANG Ying, FENG Jiahao. A study of the green innovation effect of government environmental information disclosure[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(6): 117-125.
[13]
TAN X, PENG M, YIN J, et al. Does local governments' environmental information disclosure promote corporate green innovations?[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2022 58(11): 3164-3176.
[14]
XIANG X, LIU C, YANG M, et al. Confession or justification: The effects of environmental disclosure on corporate green innovation in China[J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2020, 27(6): 2735-2750.
[15]
许林, 林思宜, 钱淑芳. 环境信息披露、绿色技术创新对融资约束的缓释效应[J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(9): 23-33.
XU Lin, LIN Siyi, QIAN Shufang. Slow-release effect of environmental information disclosure and green technology innovation on financing constraints[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2021(9): 23-33.
[16]
SCHERER F M, HARHOFF D. Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(4-5): 559-566.
[17]
竺李乐, 吴福象, 范衍玮. “专利泡沫”与“创新假象”:国有企业民营化改革及其真实创新产出[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2021, 43(12): 82-95.
ZHU Lile, WU Fuxiang, FAN Yanwei. "Patent Bubble" and "Innovation Illusion": Privatization reform of state-owned enterprises and their real innovation output[J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2021, 43(12): 82-95.
[18]
LANJOUW J O, SCHANKERMAN M. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators[J]. The Economic Journal, 2004, 114(495): 441-465.
[19]
黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?:宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4): 60-73.
LI Wenjing, ZHENG Manni. Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation? Impact of macroeconomic policies on micro-enterprises' innovation[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, 51(4): 60-73.
[20]
SHA Y, ZHANG P, WANG Y, et al. Capital market opening and green innovation: Evidence from Shanghai-Hong Kong stock connect and the Shenzhen-Hong Kong stock connect[J]. Energy Economics, 2022, 111: 106048.
[21]
AKCIGIT U, BASLANDZE S, STANTCHEVA S. Taxation and the international mobility of inventors[J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(10): 2930-2981.
[22]
张杰, 郑文平. 创新追赶战略抑制了中国专利质量么?[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(5): 28-41.
ZHANG Jie, ZHENG Wenping. Has catch-up strategy of innovation inhibited the quality of China's patents?[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2018, 53(5): 28-41.
[23]
蔡春, 郑开放, 陈晔, 等. 政府环境审计对企业环境责任信息披露的影响研究:基于“三河三湖”环境审计的经验证据[J]. 审计研究, 2019(6): 3-12.
CAI Chun, ZHENG Kaifang, Chen Ye, et al. Research on the effect of environmental audit on corporate environment information disclosure: Empirical evidence from the environmental audit of "Three Rivers and Three Lakes"[J]. Auditing Research, 2019(6): 3-12.
[24]
ZHANG Z, SU Z, WANG K, et al. Corporate environmental information disclosure and stock price crash risk: Evidence from Chinese listed heavily polluting companies[J]. Energy Economics, 2022, 112: 106116.
[25]
李哲, 王文翰. “多言寡行”的环境责任表现能否影响银行信贷获取:基于“言”和“行”双维度的文本分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021(12): 116-132.
LI Zhe, WANG Wenhan. Corporate environmental responsibility and bank credit: Text analysis of words and deeds[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2021(12): 116-132.
[26]
刘金科, 肖翊阳. 中国环境保护税与绿色创新:杠杆效应还是挤出效应?[J]. 经济研究, 2022, 57(1): 72-88.
LIU Jinke, XIAO Yiyang. China's environmental protection tax and green innovation: Incentive effect or crowding-out effect?[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2022, 57(1): 72-88.
[27]
MA Y, ZHANG Q, YIN Q. Top management team faultlines, green technology innovation and firm financial performance[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 285: 112095.
[28]
曹虹剑, 张帅, 欧阳峣, 等. 创新政策与“专精特新”中小企业创新质量[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(11): 135-154.
CAO Hongjian, ZHANG Shuai, OU Yangyao, et al. Innovation policy and the innovation quality of specialized and sophisticated SMEs that produce novel and unique products[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(11): 135-154.
[29]
HUANG X, LIU W, ZHANG Z, et al. Quantity or quality: Environmental legislation and corporate green innovations[J]. Ecological Economics, 2023, 204: 107684.
[30]
JIANG Cailou, ZHANG Fuyu, WU Chong. Environmental information disclosure, political connections and innovation in high-polluting enterprises[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 764: 144248.
[31]
胡楠, 薛付婧, 王昊楠. 管理者短视主义影响企业长期投资吗?:基于文本分析和机器学习[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5): 139-156+11+19-21.
HU Nan, XUE Fujing, WANG Haonan. Does managerial myopia affect long-term investment? Based on text analysis and machine learning[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(5): 139-156+11+19-21.
[32]
GAREL A. Myopic market pricing and managerial myopia[J]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2017, 44(9-10): 1194-1213.
[33]
DEMERJIAN P R, LEV B, LEWIS M F, et al. Managerial ability and earnings quality[J]. The Accounting Review, 2013, 88(2): 463-498.
[34]
LIN Z, PATEL P, OGHAZI P. The value of managerial ability and general ability for inventor CEOs[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 135: 78-98.
[35]
YUNG K, CHEN C. Managerial ability and firm risk-taking behavior[J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2018, 51: 1005-1032.
[36]
CHEN Y, PODOLSKI E J, VEERARAGHAVAN M. Does managerial ability facilitate corporate innovative success?[J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2015, 34: 313-326.
[37]
CHEN X, WAN P, SIAL M S. Institutional investors' site visits and corporate social responsibility: Implications for the extractive industries[J]. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2021, 8(1): 374-382.
[38]
BENKRAIEM R, GOUTTE S, SAADI S, et al. Investor heterogeneity and negative skewness in stock returns: Evidence from institutional investors[J]. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2022, 81: 101690.
[39]
BAILEY J, GODSALL J. Short-termism: Insights from business leaders, findings from a global survey of business leaders commissioned by McKinsey & Company and CPP Investment Board[J]. dezembro de, 2013.
[40]
XU J, ZENG S, QI S, et al. Do institutional investors facilitate corporate environmental innovation?[J]. Energy Economics, 2023, 117: 106472.

基金

国家社会科学基金项目:“重大突发公共卫生事件政府应急管理组织的协同机制研究”(20BZZ107)
国家社会科学基金项目:“重大突发公共卫生事件政府应急管理组织的协同机制研究”(2020.09—2023.09)
教育部青年基金项目:“环境规制对绿色矿业发展的影响机制及提升路径研究”(21YJC790102)
教育部青年基金项目:“环境规制对绿色矿业发展的影响机制及提升路径研究”(2021.08—2024.06)
省社科联2024年度辽宁省经济社会发展研究课题研究成果(青年人才项目):“关于加强我省城乡基层社会治理制度创新的对策研究”(2024lslqnrckt-037)
省社科联2024年度辽宁省经济社会发展研究课题研究成果(青年人才项目):“关于加强我省城乡基层社会治理制度创新的对策研究”(2023.09—2024.09)

PDF(1199 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/