中国政府创新补助对双元创新绩效的影响研究

荣奎桢; 陆奇斌

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.03.007

PDF(1317 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 64-73. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.03.007

论文

中国政府创新补助对双元创新绩效的影响研究

荣奎桢¹,陆奇斌²

作者信息 +

Research on the influence of Chinese government innovation subsidies on dual innovation performance

Rong Kuizhen¹, Lu Qibin²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

装备制造业是事关国家安全和国民经济发展的重要战略性产业，探究政府如何更好地帮助装备制造企业取得技术创新突破具有重要的理论和实践价值，本文以中国沪深A股装备制造业上市公司为样本，基于外部性理论和双元理论，实证检验了2010-2020年间，政府创新补助对装备制造业双元创新绩效的影响机制和作用机理。研究发现：（1）政府创新补助明显增强装备制造企业双元创新绩效；（2）政府创新补助对装备制造企业独立和合作创新都有显著正向促进作用；（3）独立创新和合作创新模式对装备制造企业双元创新绩效都具有正向影响，但独立创新模式对装备制造业双元创新绩效的影响强于合作创新模式；（4）独立创新模式与合作创新模式在政府创新补助促进双元创新绩效过程中发挥显著中介效应。本研究在理论上，有助于深入理解政府创新补助影响企业创新行为的内在机制；在管理实践上，为我国政府制定装备制造业的创新发展政策，提供理论参考。

Abstract

The equipment manufacturing industry is an important strategic industry related to national security and economic development. It is of great theoretical and practical value to explore how the government can better help equipment manufacturing enterprises to achieve technological innovation breakthroughs. This paper took the listed companies of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share equipment manufacturing industry in China as samples and empirical tested the influence mechanism and action mechanism of government innovation subsidy on the dual innovation performance of equipment manufacturing industry from 2010 to 2020, based on the externality theory and dual theory. The findings are as follows: (1) Government innovation subsidies significantly enhance the dual innovation performance of equipment manufacturing enterprises; (2) Government innovation subsidies have a significant positive effect on the independent and cooperative innovation of equipment manufacturing enterprises; (3) Both independent innovation and cooperative innovation mode have a positive impact on the dual innovation performance of equipment manufacturing enterprises, but the independent innovation mode has a stronger impact on the dual innovation performance of equipment manufacturing enterprises than the cooperative innovation mode. (4) Independent innovation model and cooperative innovation model play a significant mediating effect in the process of government innovation subsidies in promoting dual innovation performance. In theory, this study is helpful to deeply understand the internal mechanism of government innovation subsidy affecting enterprise innovation behavior. In terms of management practice, it will provide some theoretical reference for Chinese government to formulate innovative development policies for the equipment manufacturing industry.

导出引用

荣奎桢, 陆奇斌. 中国政府创新补助对双元创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(3): 64-73 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.03.007

Rong Kuizhen, Lu Qibin. Research on the influence of Chinese government innovation subsidies on dual innovation performance[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(3): 64-73 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.03.007

参考文献

[1]杨瑾, 王雪娇. 模块化、知识流动与装备制造业集群企业创新绩效[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(12): 47-52.
[2]徐宇辰. 中国装备制造业创新发展与国际借鉴的思考[J]. 中国发展观察, 2022(01): 39-45.
[3]王霞. 中美贸易摩擦对全球制造业格局的影响研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2019, 36(06): 22-40.
[4]徐东华. 智能制造构筑竞争新优势[J]. 经济, 2022(02): 22-25.
[5]张杰, 吴书凤. “十四五”时期中国关键核心技术创新的障碍与突破路径分析[J]. 人文杂志, 2021(01): 9-19.
[6]Cano-Kollmann M, Hamilton R D, Mudambi R. Public support for innovation and the openness of firms' innovation activities[J]. Industrial & Corporate Change, 2016, 26(3): 1-22.
[7]Bronzini R, Piselli P. The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(2): 442-457.
[8]Greco M, Grimaldi M, Cricelli L. Hitting the nail on the head: Exploring the relationship between public subsidies and open innovation efficiency[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 118: 213-225.
[9]陈朝月, 许治. 政府研发资助不同方式对企业开放式创新的影响探究[J]. 管理学报, 2018.
[10]Chapman G, Lucena A, Afcha S. R&D subsidies & external collaborative breadth: Differential gains and the role of collaboration experience[J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(3): 623-636.
[11]Krzeminska A, Eckert C. Complementarity of internal and external R&D: Is there a difference between product versus process innovations[J]. R&D Management, 2016, 46(S3):931-944.
[12]Mu?oz-Bullón F, Sanchez-Bueno M J, De Massis A. Combining internal and external R&D: The effects on innovation performance in family and nonfamily firms[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2020, 44(5): 996-1031.
[13]Lee R, Lee J H, Garrett T C. Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 99: 507-515.
[14]Jugend D, Jabbour C J C, Alves Scaliza J A, et al. Relationships among open innovation, innovative performance, government support and firm size: comparing Brazilian firms embracing different levels of radicalism in innovation[J]. Technovation, 2018, 74-75(1): 54-65.
[15]Lee E Y, Cin B C. The effect of risk-sharing government subsidy on corporate R&D investment: Empirical evidence from Korea[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2010, 77(6): 881-890.
[16]申香华. 银行风险识别, 政府财政补贴与企业债务融资成本——基于沪深两市2007--2012年公司数据的实证检验[J]. 财贸经济, 2014 (9): 62-71.
[17]任曙明, 吕镯. 融资约束、政府补贴与全要素生产率——来自中国装备制造企业的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2014(11): 10-23+187.
[18]Laursen K, Salter A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2): 131-150.
[19]石宇飞. 以制造业发展促进中国国家竞争力提升——基于波特钻石模型的分析[J]. 税务与经济, 2020(04): 20-26.
[20]Hall B H, Lotti F, Mairesse J. Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investments on innovation and productivity in Italian firms[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2013, 22(3): 300-328.
[21]Arvanitis S. How do different motives for R&D cooperation affect firm performance? –An analysis based on Swiss micro data[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2012, 22(5): 981-1007.
[22]Fritsch M, Franke G. Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation[J]. Research policy, 2004, 33(2): 245-255.
[23]Lavie D, Kang J, Rosenkopf L. Balance within and across domains: The performance implications of exploration and exploitation in alliances[J]. Organization Science, 2011, 22(6): 1517-1538.
[24]Artz K W, Norman P M, Hatfield D E, et al. A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents,and product innovation on firm performance.The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 27(5): 725-740．
[25]路风. 走向自主创新: 寻求中国力量的源泉[J]. 教学与研究, 2019(10): 2.
[26]王刚刚, 谢富纪, 贾友. R&D补贴政策激励机制的重新审视——基于外部融资激励机制的考察[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017(2): 60-78.
[27]孙早, 宋炜. 企业R&D投入对产业创新绩效的影响——来自中国制造业的经验证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2012, 29(4): 49-63.
[28]Kang K, Park H. Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs[J]. Technovation, 2012, 32(1): 68-78.
[29]Okamuro H, Kato M, Honjo Y. Determinants of R&D cooperation in Japanese start-ups[J]. Research policy, 2011, 40(5): 728-738.
[30]唐荣. 产业政策促进企业价值链升级的有效性研究——来自中国制造企业微观数据的证据[J]. 当代财经, 2020(2): 101-115.
[31]伍红, 郑家兴. 政府补助和减税降费对企业创新效率的影响——基于制造业上市企业的门槛效应分析[J]. 当代财经, 2021(3): 28-39.
[32]郭玥. 政府创新补助的信号传递机制与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(9): 98-116.
[33]袁胜军, 俞立平, 钟昌标, 等. 创新政策促进了创新数量还是创新质量?——以高技术产业为例[J]. 中国软科学, 2020(3): 32-45.
[34]Hagedoorn J, Wang N. Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies?[J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(6): 1072-1083.
[35]宋砚秋, 齐永欣, 高婷, 等. 政府创新补贴、企业创新活力与创新绩效[J]. 经济学家, 2021(6): 111-120.
[36]傅宇, 崔维军, 韩硕. 合作研发与企业创新绩效——基于世界银行中国企业调查数据的实证分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(01): 98-106.
[37]黄菁菁, 原毅军. 基于倾向得分匹配模型的产学研合作与企业创新绩效研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2018, 30(02): 1-9.
[38]Chen J, Su X, Tian X, et al. Does customer-base structure influence managerial risk-taking incentives?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2022, 143(1): 462-483.
[39]吴育辉, 田亚男, 陈韫妍, 徐倩. 绿色债券发行的溢出效应、作用机理及绩效研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(06): 176-193.
[40]Yu W, Minniti M, Nason R. Underperformance duration and innovative search: Evidence from the high-tech manufacturing industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2019, 40(5): 836-861.
[41]陈强. 高级计量经济学及Stata应用（第二版）[M]. 北京：高等教育出版社, 2014:468-471.