企业技术引进、产权与倒U型绩效——基于中国上市公司的实证研究

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 45-54.

企业技术引进、产权与倒U型绩效——基于中国上市公司的实证研究

徐欣

中南财经政法大学会计学院, 湖北武汉 430073

收稿日期:2013-12-11 修回日期:2015-01-25 出版日期:2015-09-25 发布日期:2015-09-18
作者简介:徐欣(1980-),男(汉),湖北武汉人,中南财经政法大学会计学院副教授,博士,研究方向:会计控制与财务政策,企业创新投资与风险管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目"风险投资与企业技术创新投融资:作用机制和绩效研究"(项目编号:71402189;起止时间:2015年1月至2017年12月)。

Corporate technology indraught, property and inverted U-shaped performance: An empirical research on Chinese listed companies

Xu Xin

School of Accounting, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China

Received:2013-12-11 Revised:2015-01-25 Online:2015-09-25 Published:2015-09-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文基于企业投资的视角,以2002-2009年中国制造业上市公司为对象,考察了技术引进、产权性质与企业绩效之间的关系。研究发现,企业技术引进与绩效之间存在明显的倒U型关系,技术引进有利于企业绩效的提高,但由于边际效用递减,技术引进对于绩效的改善存在极大值点,超过了极大值点,技术引进则会对企业绩效产生负面影响。这说明企业依靠外来技术并不能持续地改善企业绩效。此外,企业的产权性质对于技术引进与绩效之间的倒U型关系存在调节效应,即非国有控股企业使用外部技术产生的绩效要好于国有控股企业。本文的结论对于深入认识技术引进的经济后果提供了新的视角和证据,并为中国企业提高外部技术的吸收效率和合理配置创新资源提供了决策依据和政策建议。

关键词: 技术引进, 产权, 倒U型绩效

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between corporate technology indraught, property and firm performance from the perspective of corporate investments using Chinese manufacturing listed companies for the period 2002-2009 as research samples. It is found that an inverted U-shaped relationship exists between technology indraught and firm performance. Technology indraught is beneficial to firm performance but only up to a tipping point due to diminishing marginal utility. Over this tipping point, excess technology indraught will have a negative impact on firm performance. This indicates that corporate technology indraught cannot sustainably improve firm performance. In addition, the nature of property has a moderating effect on the inverted U-shaped relationship between technology indraught and firm performance. The non-state-controlled companies using the external technology produce better financial performance than state-controlled companies do. The conclusion of this paper provides a new perspective and evidence for the economic consequence of technology indraught. Some valuable suggestions and theoretical guidance for enterprises to improve the absorption efficiency of external technology and rationally allocate innovation resource are put forward.

Key words: technology indraught, property, inverted U-shaped performance

中图分类号:

徐欣. 企业技术引进、产权与倒U型绩效——基于中国上市公司的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(9): 45-54.

Xu Xin. Corporate technology indraught, property and inverted U-shaped performance: An empirical research on Chinese listed companies[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(9): 45-54.

参考文献

[1] Chuang, Yih-chyi. Learning by doing, technology gap, and growth[J]. International Economic Review, 1998(39): 697-721. [2] 林毅夫,张鹏飞.后发优势、技术引进和落后国家的经济增长[J]. 经济学季刊,2005(1): 53-74.Lin Yifu, Zhang Pengfei.The advantage of latter comers, technology imports, and economics of economic growth of developing countries[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2005(1): 53-74. [3] 吴延兵.自主研发、技术引进与生产率——基于中国地区工业的实证研究[J]. 经济研究,2008(8): 51-64.Wu Yanbing.Indigenous R&D, technology imports and productivity: Evidence from industries across regions of China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2008(8): 51-64. [4] 朱平芳,李磊.两种技术引进方式的直接效应研究——上海大中型工业企业的微观实证[J]. 经济研究,2006(3): 90-102.Zhu Pingfang, Li lei. Direct growth effects of ownership and technology imports: Firm level evidence from large and medium enterprises in Shanghai[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2006(3): 90-102. [5] 徐欣,唐清泉.技术研发、技术引进与企业主营业务的行业变更——基于中国制造业上市公司的实证研究[J].金融研究,2012(10): 193-206.Xu Xin, Tang Qingquan.R&D, technology indraught and industry changes of main business: An empirical research on Chinese manufacturing listed companies[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2012(10): 193-206. [6] Lev, B. Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting[M]. Brookings Institution Press, 2001: 42-49. [7] Rigby, D., and C. Zook. Open market innovation[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2002, 80(10): 80-89. [8] Hagedoorn, J. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960[J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(4): 477-492. [9] Chesbrough, H. W., W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm[M]. Oxford University Press, 2006: 79-90. [10] 林毅夫. 中国经济专题[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2012:10-13.Lin Yifu. Demystifying the Chinese economy[M]. Peking University Press, 2012: 10-13. [11] Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(1): 68-82. [12] 徐欣,企业自主研发与技术引进的协同-平衡效应——基于中国上市公司的实证分析[J]. 经济管理,2013(7): 47-55.Xu Xin.Study on effect of synergy and balance of corporate R&D and technology indraught:An empirical analysis on Chinese listed companies[J]. Economic Management Journal, 2013(7): 47-55. [13] Tushman, M. L., and P. Anderson. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31: 439-465. [14] Anderson, P., and M. L. Tushman. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35: 604-633. [15] Barney, J. Firmresources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991(8): 169-182. [16] Gulati, R., and H. Singh. The architecture of cooperation: managingcoordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliance[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43(4): 781-814. [17] Bettis, R. A., S. P. Bradley, and G. Hamel. Outsourcing and industrial decline[J]. Academy of Management Executive, 1992, 6(1): 7-22. [18] Levinthal, D. A., and J. G. March. The myopia of learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14: 95-112. [19] 张景安. 实施由技术引进为主向自主创新为主的战略思考[J]. 中国软科学,2003(11):1-5.Zhang Jiangan.Strategic thinking on transit from technology import to independent innovation[J]. China Soft Science Magazine, 2003(11): 1-5. [20] Laursen, K., and A. Salter. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(2): 131-150. [21] Berchicci, L. Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(1): 117-127. [22] La Porta. R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes and A. Shleifer, corporate ownership around the world[J]. Journal of Finance, 1999, 54(2): 471-517. [23] Alchian, A. Some economics of property rights[J]. Politico, 1965, 30(4): 816-829. [24] 吴延兵.中国工业产业创新水平及影响因素——面板数据的实证分析[J]. 产业经济评论,2006(2):155-171.Wu Yanbing.Innovation in Chinese industry and its influential factors: An empirical analysis of panel data[J]. Review of Industrial Economies, 2006(2): 155-171. [25] 李春涛,宋敏.中国制造业企业的创新活动:所有制和CEO激励的作用[J]. 经济研究,2010(5):55-67.Li Chuntao, Song Min.Innovation activities in Chinese manufacturing firms: The roles of firm ownership and CEO incentives[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2010(5): 55-67. [26] 周黎安,罗凯. 企业规模与创新:来自中国省级水平的经验证据[J]. 经济学季刊,2005,4(3):623-638.Zhou Li-an, Luo Kai.Firm size and innovation: Evidence from China's province level[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2005, 4(3): 623-638. [27] 徐欣,唐清泉.R&D投资、知识存量与专利产出——基于专利产出类型和企业最终控制人视角的分析[J]. 经济管理,2012(7):49-59.Xu Xin, Tang Qingquan. R&D investments, stock of knowledge and patents output: Based on types of patents output and ultimate controlling shareholder of firm[J]. Economic Management Journal, 2012(7): 49-59.