科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 42-50.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.01.005

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

情境-认知视角下科创企业技术创新演进路径研究

王象路1, 罗瑾琏1, 郭利敏2, 闫佳祺3   

  1. 1.同济大学经济与管理学院，上海200092；
    2.西北工业大学管理学院，陕西 西安710072；
    3.东北大学工商管理学院，辽宁 沈阳110169
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-02 修回日期:2023-10-02 出版日期:2024-01-20 发布日期:2024-01-02
  • 通讯作者: 罗瑾琏
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目：“内化于心何以外显于行：创新使命的多层次意义建构及对企业突破性创新影响效应研究”(72072128，2021.01—2024.12)；国家自然科学基金面上项目：“企业数智化变革中的悖论协同能力建构与效应研究”(72372118，2024.01—2027.12)；国家自然科学基金青年项目：“人力资源管理强度的意义建构与效能发展机制：基于事件视角”(72102033，2022.01—2024.12)。

Research on the technological innovation evolution path of S&T innovation enterprises from a contextual-cognitive perspective

Wang Xianglu1, Luo Jinlian1, Guo Limin2, Yan Jiaqi3   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
    2. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi′an 710072, Shaanxi, China;
    3. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2023-05-02 Revised:2023-10-02 Online:2024-01-20 Published:2024-01-02
  • Contact: Luo JinLian

摘要：     “中国式创新”是实现中国式现代化的重要基础，其在微观层面体现为中国情境下的企业创新实践集合。科创板推行以来，一批科创企业以不同于发达国家科技型企业的创新路径实现众多领域技术赶超，这为探究中国式创新的优势与经验提供了良好契机。本文选取司南导航和司羿智能两家典型的科创企业作为案例研究对象，结合注意力基础观和资源编排理论解析科创企业在中国情境下的技术创新演进路径，研究发现：科创企业技术创新演进路径经历技术探索、技术拓展和技术升级三个阶段。在技术探索阶段，科创企业依托强政府主导下的技术攻关体系，确立创新使命主导逻辑，进而以拼凑式资源建构实现技术突破；在技术拓展阶段，科创企业根据中国超大规模市场下的特定细分市场特征，确立需求开发或技术迁移主导逻辑，进而以开拓式或耦合式资源捆绑实现技术跨界；在技术升级阶段，科创企业借助我国战略性新兴产业高速发展契机，确立生态建构主导逻辑，进而以重构式资源撬动实现技术集成。研究结论从科创企业技术演进路径视角揭示了中国式创新的过程机理，也对中国情境下企业创新管理实践具有指导意义。

关键词: 中国式创新, 科创企业, 中国情境, 主导逻辑, 资源编排

Abstract:     Chinese-style innovation is an inherent part of Chinese-style modernization, particularly evident at the micro-level through the innovative practices of enterprises within the Chinese context. Since the implementation of the S&T innovation Board, a cohort of S&T innovation enterprises (STIEs) have achieved technological leaps in diverse domains using innovation paths distinct from those observed in advanced economies. The innovative practice provides an exceptional opportunity to explore the strengths and experiences associated with Chinese-style innovation. This study selected two typical STIEs, Sino GNSS and Siyi Intelligence, analyzed the evolution path of technological innovation within STIEs operating in the Chinese context based on the attention-based view and resource allocation theory. The study found that: the evolution of technological innovation in STIEs comprises three phases: technological exploration, technological expansion, and technological upgrading. In the technological exploration phase, STIEs rely on the robust government-led technology development ecosystem to establish a mission-oriented dominant logic, and complete technological breakthroughs through patchwork resource construction. In the technology expansion phase, STIEs rely on the characteristics of market segments in China′s ultra-large-scale market to establish a demand-development or technology-migration dominant logic, and complete technology expansion through exploratory or coupled resource bundling. In the technological upgrading phase, STIEs harness the rapid growth of China′s strategic emerging industries to adopt an ecosystem-building dominant logic, and complete technological integration through restructuring resource leveraging. The research conclusion not only revealed the process mechanism of the Chinese-style innovation from the perspective of the technological evolution path within STIEs, but also provided valuable guidance for the innovation management practice of enterprises in the Chinese context.

Key words:  Chinese-style innovation, S&T innovation enterprise, Chinese context, dominant logic, resource orchestration