放宽市场准入对企业新质生产力的影响研究

陈邑早, 解纯慧, 王圣媛, 岳新茹

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12) : 19-28.

PDF(1212 KB)
PDF(1212 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12) : 19-28. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.003

放宽市场准入对企业新质生产力的影响研究

作者信息 +

A study on the impact of market access liberalization on the new quality productivity of enterprises

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

培育和提升企业新质生产力,是加快推进我国新旧动能结构转换,推动实现中国式现代化的重要途径。本文采用2013—2022年沪深A股上市公司数据,利用市场准入负面清单试点这一准自然实验,考察放宽市场准入对企业新质生产力的影响。研究发现,放宽市场准入能够促进企业新质生产力提升,具体表现为,相比未受政策影响地区的企业,受到政策影响地区企业的新质生产力提升幅度约为1.42%。机制分析表明,放宽市场准入对企业新质生产力的提升作用,主要通过市场竞争效应和制度性成本效应来实现。异质性研究发现,放宽市场准入对企业新质生产力的影响在公司治理水平较低和融资约束可能性较高的企业中更高。最后,在放宽市场准入的制度背景下,企业新质生产力的提高有利于促进企业投资价值提升。相关结论不仅能够深化现有研究关于放宽市场准入赋能作用的理论认识,还能够为我国加快培育和提升新质生产力带来政策启示。

Abstract

Cultivating and upgrading the new quality productivity of enterprises is an important way to accelerate the structural transformation of China's old and new kinetic energy and to promote the realization of Chinese-style modernization. This paper used the data from A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2013-2022 to examine the impact of market access liberalization on enterprises' new quality productivity by using a quasi-natural experiment, the Negative Market Access List (Pilot). The study found that market access liberalization can promote new quality productivity gains for enterprises, as evidenced by the fact that compared to enterprises in regions not affected by the policy, enterprises in regions affected by the policy have a new quality productivity gain of about 1.42%. The mechanistic analysis showed that the effect of market access liberalization on the new quality productivity of enterprises is mainly realized through the market competition effect and the systemic cost effect. The heterogeneity studies found that the effect of market access liberalization on enterprises' new quality productivity is higher among enterprises with lower levels of corporate governance and higher likelihood of financing constraints. Finally, in the context of a system of liberalized market access, the increase in the new quality of productivity of enterprises is conducive to promoting the value of corporate investment. The relevant conclusions can not only deepen the theoretical understanding of existing research on the enabling role of market access liberalization, but also provide policy insights for China to accelerate the cultivation and upgrading of new quality productivity.

关键词

新质生产力 / 市场准入负面清单 / 市场竞争效应 / 制度性成本效应

Key words

new quality productivity / negative list of market access / market competition effect / systemic cost effect

引用本文

导出引用
陈邑早, 解纯慧, 王圣媛, . 放宽市场准入对企业新质生产力的影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(12): 19-28 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.003
Chen Yizao, Xie Chunhui, Wang Shengyuan, et al. A study on the impact of market access liberalization on the new quality productivity of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(12): 19-28 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.003
中图分类号: F275   

参考文献

[1]
蒲清平, 黄媛媛. 习近平总书记关于新质生产力重要论述的生成逻辑、理论创新与时代价值[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 49(6):1-11.
PU Qingping, HUANG Yuanyuan. Generation logic, theoretical innovation and time value of General Secretary Xi Jinping's important exposition on new quality productivity[J]. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 49(6):1-11.
[2]
周绍东, 胡华杰. 新质生产力推动创新发展的政治经济学研究[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 45(5):26-35.
ZHOU Shaodong, HU Huajie. The political economy of new quality productivity to drive innovation and development[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University(Edition of Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2024, 45(5):26-35.
[3]
周志方, 韩尚杰, 程序. 市场准入管制放松与企业创新:基于“市场准入负面清单制度”试点的准自然实验[J]. 财经研究, 2023, 49(11):125-139.
ZHOU Zhifang, HAN Shangjie, CHENG Xu. Deregulation of market access and corporate innovation: A quasi-natural experiment based on the pilot of “Negative List System for Market Access”[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2023, 49(11):125-139.
[4]
耿明阳, 谢雁翔, 金振, 等. 市场准入负面清单与企业全要素生产率:基于全国统一大市场建设的情境分析[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2023, 25(4):3-17+32.
GENG Mingyang, XIE Yanxiang, JIN Zhen, et al. Negative list for market access and enterprise TFP: Contextual analysis based on the construction of a unified national market[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2023, 25(4):3-17+32.
[5]
李政, 廖晓东. 发展“新质生产力”的理论、历史和现实“三重”逻辑[J]. 政治经济学评论, 2023, 14(6):146-159.
LI Zheng, LIAO Xiaodong. The theoretical, historical, and realistic “triple” logics of developing “new quality productivity”[J]. China Review of Political Economy, 2023, 14(6):146-159.
[6]
黄群慧, 盛方富. 新质生产力系统:要素特质、结构承载与功能取向[J]. 改革, 2024(2):15-24.
HUANG Qunhui, SHENG Fangfu. New productive forces system: Factor characteristics, structural bearing and functional orientation[J]. Reform, 2024(2):15-24.
[7]
白智奇, 陈艳, 王晰. 高管非货币性私有收益与薪酬有关吗:基于契约参照点理论的实证检验[J]. 山西财经大学学报, 2019, 41(2):63-79.
BAI Zhiqi, CHEN Yan, WANG Xi. Do executives non-monetary private benefits relate to compensation: An empirical study based on the contract reference point theory[J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2019, 41(2):63-79.
[8]
陈克兢, 万清清, 康艳玲. 国家治理体系与国有企业创新效率:基于巡视监督的准自然实验[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(8):211-219.
CHEN Kejing, WAN Qingqing, KANG Yanling. State governance system and innovation efficiency of state-owned enterprises:A quasi natural experiment based on inspection supervision[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(8):211-219.
[9]
李健. 规制俘获理论跨学科研究进展述评[J]. 经济评论, 2012(1):153-160.
LI Jian. Progresses of inter-discipline related to regulatory capture theory[J]. Economic Review, 2012(1):153-160.
[10]
李健, 杨蓓蓓, 潘镇. 产品市场竞争、管理层持股与管理效率:基于中国制造业企业面板数据的研究[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2016, 31(5):72-83.
LI Jian, YANG Beibei, PAN Zhen. Product market competition, managerial ownership and management efficiency: A study based on the panel data of manufacturing companies in China[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 2016, 31(5):72-83.
[11]
张传财, 陈汉文. 产品市场竞争、产权性质与内部控制质量[J]. 会计研究, 2017(5):75-82+97.
ZHANG Chuancai, CHEN Hanwen. Product market competition, state ownership and internal control quality[J]. Accounting Research, 2017(5):75-82+97.
[12]
陈汉文, 黄轩昊. 内部控制、薪酬差距与企业价值[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(2):60-69.
CHEN Hanwen, HUANG Xuanhao. Internal control, pay gap and firm value[J]. Journal of Xiamen University (Arts & Social Sciences), 2019(2):60-69.
[13]
李萍, 舒伟, 唐清泉, 等. 内部控制能提高企业R&D投资的价值相关性吗?[J]. 中国会计评论, 2015(3): 325-346.
LI Ping, SHU Wei, TANG Qingquan, et al. Do internal controls improve the value relevance of corporate R&D investments?[J] China Accounting Review, 2015(3): 325-346.
[14]
何玉润, 林慧婷, 王茂林. 产品市场竞争、高管激励与企业创新:基于中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 财贸经济, 2015(2):125-135.
HE Yurun, LIN Huiting, WANG Maolin. Production market competition, executive incentives and corporate innovation: Empirical evidence from listed Chinese companies[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2015(2):125-135.
[15]
张楠, 徐良果, 戴泽伟, 等. 产品市场竞争、知识产权保护与企业创新投入[J]. 财经科学, 2019(11):54-66.
ZHANG Nan, XU Liangguo, DAI Zewei, et al. Product market competition, intellectual property right protection and corporate innovation investment[J]. Finance & Economics, 2019(11):54-66.
[16]
刘行, 赵健宇. 税收激励与企业创新:基于增值税转型改革的“准自然实验”[J]. 会计研究, 2019(9):43-49.
LIU Hang, ZHAO Jianyu. Tax incentive and firm innovation: Evidence from China's value-added tax reform[J]. Accounting Research, 2019(9):43-49.
[17]
陈海强, 韩乾, 吴锴. 融资约束抑制技术效率提升吗?:基于制造业微观数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2015(10):148-162.
CHEN Haiqiang, HAN Qian, WU Kai. Does financial constraints impede technical efficiency improvement? An empirical study based on micro data of manufacturing firms[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2015(10):148-162.
[18]
王小鲁, 樊纲, 胡李鹏. 中国分省份市场化指数报告(2018)[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019.
WANG Xiaolu, FAN Gang, HU Lipeng. China sub-provincial marketisation index report (2018)[M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press(China), 2019.
[19]
王萍萍, 陈波. 军民融合企业技术效率及其影响因素研究[J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(4):70-82.
WANG Pingping, CHEN Bo. Study on technical efficiency and its antecedents of civilian-military integrated firms[J]. Management Review, 2019, 31(4):70-82.
[20]
韩忠雪, 崔建伟, 王闪. 技术高管提升了企业技术效率吗?[J]. 科学学研究, 2014, 32(4):559-568.
摘要
关于企业高管背景及团队的研究较为普遍,但考察技术背景高管在企业中作用的则较为少见,利用手工搜集的技术背景高管资料,采用SFA方法计算技术效率,以280家民营上市公司2004-2011年的数据为样本,研究技术高管是如何影响技术效率以及两者之间的关系。研究结果显示,技术高管对于公司技术效率的提升具有显著促进作用,技术高管通过增大企业R&D投入、技术人员比例、专利数量和技术人员产出而使得企业技术效率得到提升。
HAN Zhongxue, CUI Jianwei, WANG Shan. Does technical executives promote corporate technical efficiency?[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2014, 32(4):559-568.
Although the backgrounds of corporate executives and their groups have been widely researched, it’s relatively rare on examining the role of technical executives in a company. By applying SFA method to calculate technical efficiency, this paper use 280 private-owned listed companies in China from 2004 to 2011 to study how technical executives influence the technical efficiency and the relation between them. The results suggest that technical executives in private-owned listed companies significantly improve corporate technical efficiency. Furthermore, technical executives can promote corporate technical efficiency by increasing R&D expenditure, technical personnel, patents and technical output.
[21]
GUO Zijian, CEVID D, BÜHLMANN P. Doubly debiased lasso: High-dimensional inference under hidden confounding[J]. The Annals of Statistics, 2022, 50(3):1320-1347.
[22]
孙治宇, 孙文远. 外商直接投资、企业技术效率与战略性新兴产业发展:基于江苏省上市公司数据的随机前沿分析[J]. 世界经济与政治论坛, 2017(3):122-138.
SUN Zhiyu, SUN Wenyuan. Foreign direct investment, firms' technical efficiency and the development of strategic emerging industries: A stochastic frontier analysis based on the data of listed companies in Jiangsu Province[J]. Forum of World Economics & Politics, 2017(3):122-138.
[23]
郭吉涛, 张边秀. “一带一路”倡议如何作用于中国OFDI企业技术效率:机制讨论与经验证据[J]. 产业经济研究, 2021(1):86-99.
GUO Jitao, ZHANG Bianxiu. How does the Belt and Road Initiative affect the technical efficiency of Chinese OFDI enterprises: Mechanism discussion and empirical evidence[J]. Industrial Economics Research, 2021(1):86-99.
[24]
陈骏, 徐捍军. 企业寻租如何影响盈余管理[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(12):171-188.
CHEN Jun, XU Hanjun. How does enterprise rent-seeking affect earnings management[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2019(12):171-188.
[25]
李粮. 公司治理、内部控制与混改国企协调发展:基于利益相关者理论的视角[J]. 经济问题, 2020(5):79-88+122.
LI Liang. The relationship between corporate governance, internal control and coordinated development of state-owned enterprises: A research from the perspective of stakeholder theory[J]. On Economic Problems, 2020(5):79-88+122.
[26]
王靖宇, 张宏亮. 产品市场竞争与企业投资效率:一项准自然实验[J]. 财经研究, 2019, 45(10):125-137.
WANG Jingyu, ZHANG Hongliang. An empirical research on the relationship between product market competition and investment efficiency[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2019, 45(10):125-137.
[27]
宋凌云, 王贤彬. 政府补贴与产业结构变动[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013(4):94-106.
SONG Lingyun, WANG Xianbin. Government subsidies and changes in industrial structure[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2013(4):94-106.
[28]
FAZZARI S M, HUBBARD R G, PETERSEN B C. Financing constraints and corporate investment[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988(1):141-206.

基金

教育部人文社会科学基金规划项目:“基于金融科技的风险识别与投资者关注研究”(23YJA630014)
教育部人文社会科学基金规划项目:“基于金融科技的风险识别与投资者关注研究”(2023.10—2026.10)
山东省自然科学基金青年项目:“市场监管政府机构整合、企业财务信息治理与资本市场响应”(ZR2023QG055)
山东省自然科学基金青年项目:“市场监管政府机构整合、企业财务信息治理与资本市场响应”(2024.01—2026.12)
山东省高等学校青创团队计划:“产业集聚与绿色低碳发展”(2022RW043)
山东省高等学校青创团队计划:“产业集聚与绿色低碳发展”(2022.12—2025.12)

PDF(1212 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/