科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 161-170.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.03.017

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

国别差异视角下知识产权保护对数字服务贸易的影响机制研究

欧忠辉1,姜南2,3,马艺闻2   

  1. 1.福建商学院 财务与会计学院,福建 福州350012;
    2.同济大学 上海国际知识产权学院,上海200092;
    3.复旦大学 知识产权研究中心,上海200433

  • 收稿日期:2022-09-24 修回日期:2023-04-20 出版日期:2024-03-20 发布日期:2024-03-11
  • 通讯作者: 姜南
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目:“数智化驱动下专利密集型产业关键核心技术创新链优化机制研究”(72274137,2023—2026);国家自然科学基金面上项目:“区域产学研合作创新生态系统共生演化及影响机理研究”(72072033,2021—2024);国家自然科学基金面上项目:“制度演化影响下专利密集型产业知识溢出和区域创新联动机制研究”(71874122,2019—2022);中央高校基本科研业务费专项:“人工智能生成物知识产权保护伦理问题及对策研究”(2022-1-YB-23,2022—2023);上海市级科技重大专项:“人工智能基础理论与关键核心技术”(2021SHZDZX0100)。

Research on the impact mechanism of intellectual property protection on digital services trade from the perspective of national differences

Ou Zhonghui1, Jiang Nan2,3, Ma Yiwen2   

  1. 1. School of Finance and Accounting, Fujian Business University, Fuzhou 350012, Fujian, China; 
    2. Shanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 
    3. Intellectual Property Research Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2022-09-24 Revised:2023-04-20 Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-03-11

摘要:     数字贸易已成为拉动全球经济增长的重要支柱,本文以45个主要贸易参与国为研究对象,利用2008-2019年各国数字服务双边贸易和知识产权保护水平等数据为样本,构建改进的贸易引力模型进行实证检验。研究结果表明:进出口国知识产权保护水平对数字服务贸易具有显著促进作用,进口国与出口国知识产权保护水平差异对数字服务贸易起到抑制作用,单方国家主要是出口国的创新水平在知识产权保护影响数字服务贸易的机制中发挥中介作用。进一步考查国别差异对知识产权保护影响数字服务贸易机制的作用后发现:双方签订区域贸易协定有助于推动知识产权保护对数字服务贸易的促进作用;国家治理能力的相对差异则会削弱知识产权保护对数字服务贸易的促进作用。本文弥补了现有研究对于数字服务贸易领域的知识产权保护作用机制在实证研究方面的阙如,对于推动我国数字服务贸易高质量发展具有一定研究价值。

关键词: 知识产权保护, 数字服务贸易, 国别差异, 国家创新

Abstract:     In the era of digital economy, international trade has gradually moved from "overall value chain trade" to "digital trade promotion". Relying on cyberspace carriers, digital trade has become an important pillar of overall economic growth in the digital economy era. The academic research on the relationship between intellectual property protection and digital trade mainly involves topics such as intellectual property rules for digital trade, restrictive measures for digital trade, and so on. This paper took 45 major participating countries of digital trade as the research objects, considering the digital services trade as an important representative and core component of digital trade. This study used the data of bilateral trade in digital services, intellectual property protection level, independent innovation, national economy and governance capacity from 2008 to 2019 as samples to construct an improved trade gravity model and conduct empirical test and extended analysis. The results showed that the level of intellectual property protection in importing and exporting countries has a significant promoting effect on digital service trade. The differences in the level of intellectual property protection between importing and exporting countries has an inhibitory effect on digital services trade. The innovation level of exporting countries plays a mediating role in the mechanism of intellectual property protection affecting trade in digital services. Further examining the country differences in the impact of intellectual property protection on the digital services trade mechanism, the analysis finds that the relative difference in governance capabilities between exporting and importing countries will weaken the effect of intellectual property protection on digital services trade, and the impact mechanism is more significant when both import and export countries have signed regional trade agreements (RTA).The theoretical and practical value of this research lies in: (1) It analyzed the supporting role of intellectual property protection on digital services trade from the perspective of technical foundation, key elements, internal structure, external environment, and improving the theoretical mechanism of intellectual property protection affecting digital services trade; (2) The research constructed an improved trade gravity model that introduces institutional variables, explored the relationship between intellectual property protection and digital services trade from aspects such as differences in national governance, whether trade agreements are signed, the level of national economic development, and provided new ideas for the research on the differentiation of intellectual property protection and digital services trade; (3) Through national innovation mediator variable, the research objectively reflected the rules of transmission about intellectual property protection affecting digital services trade; (4) The paper will provide empirical and policy support for using intellectual property protection to stimulate innovation in digital services trade, achieve self-reliance in high-level digital technology, and optimize the structure of digital services trade. The conclusion of this paper will propose some policy recommendations such as using intellectual property protection to stimulate digital services trade innovation, advocating international cooperation & co-governance of digital services trade, and promoting the signing of regional trade agreements.

Key words: intellectual property protection, digital services trade, national difference, national innovation