政府的引导作用对于集群中企业创新绩效的影响:基于国内科技园区数据的实证研究

科研管理 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 11-17,78.

政府的引导作用对于集群中企业创新绩效的影响:基于国内科技园区数据的实证研究

赵剑波¹, 杨震宁², 王以华³

1. 中国社会科学院工业经济研究所,北京 100836;
2. 对外经济贸易大学国际商学院,北京 100029;
3. 清华大学经济管理学院,北京 100084

收稿日期:2008-07-11 修回日期:2009-05-21 出版日期:2012-02-27 发布日期:2012-02-28
作者简介:赵剑波(1977-),男,河北人,助理研究员,研究方向:企业战略与政策、产业组织理论。
杨震宁(1976-),男,天津人,副教授,研究方向:企业战略与政策、组织理论。

The impact of policy-making on innovation performance in industrial clusters:An empirical research on Science Parks in china

Zhao Jianbo¹, Yang Zhenning², Wang Yihua³

1. Institute of Industrial Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100836, China;
2. School of Interhational Business, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China;
3. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2008-07-11 Revised:2009-05-21 Online:2012-02-27 Published:2012-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文主要研究在强调企业"自主创新"的政策环境下,政府的作用对于集群内部企业的创新行为有什么重要的影响,并分析和比较不同的企业规模以及不同性质集群内部的企业的创新绩效。本文调研了国内不同区域的企业集群,并对回收的量表采用回归分析,分析的结果显示集群内部规模较小的企业比大规模企业有较高的创新水平;软件工业园性质的企业集群比其他性质的集群创新水平要高;政府的直接帮助政策并不能够提高集群内部企业的创新水平,而政府对于集群内部竞争环境的创造和维护、以及增加集群地域吸引力和加强信息服务的一些政府措施,则有利于提高集群内部企业的技术和创新能力。

关键词: 企业集群, 政府作用, 创新绩效

Abstract: With the requirement of endogenous innovation, the impact of the policy-making on the firm's innovation activities in the clusters is investigated, and then the innovation performance among different sized firms in different clusters is comparatively analyzed. Several clusters in different regions of China are investigated, and the result shows that small firms have higher innovation level than that for those larger firms in the cluster; The firms in Software Industry Park have higher innovation level than that for the firms in other clusters; the direct policy support from local government could not improve the innovation performance of the firms in the cluster, however its indirect regulations, such as keeping a good competitive environment, improving the attractiveness of the cluster region, enhancing its information service, would make the firms easier to improve the technical and innovative competence in the cluster. At the last, the policy implication and suggestion, as well as the research limitation and future direction of the research are given.

Key words: industrial cluster, policy-making, innovation performance

中图分类号:

F425

赵剑波, 杨震宁, 王以华. 政府的引导作用对于集群中企业创新绩效的影响:基于国内科技园区数据的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(2): 11-17,78.

Zhao Jianbo, Yang Zhenning, Wang Yihua. The impact of policy-making on innovation performance in industrial clusters:An empirical research on Science Parks in china[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(2): 11-17,78.

参考文献

[1] Porter ME. The Competitive Advantage of Nations [M]. Free Press: New York, 1990. [2] Harrison B, Kelley MR, Gant J. Innovative firm behavior and local milieu: exploring the intersection of agglomeration, firm effects, and technological change [J]. Economic Geography, 1996, 72(3): 233-258. [3] Krugman P. Geography and Trade [M]. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1991. [4] 蒋东仁. 产业集群创新的政府行为透视[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2006 (12) : 61-65. [5] 潘雄锋. 产业集群发展中的政府行为研究[J]. 中南民族大学学报: 人文社会科学版, 2005 (5) : 137-139. [6] 蔡莉,朱秀梅. 科技型创业企业集群研究评述及展望[J]. 吉林大学社会科学学报, 2005, 45(4) :122~129. [7] 魏江. 创新系统演进和集群创新系统的构建[J]. 自然辩证法通讯, 2004 (1) : 48-54. [8] Shaver, J.M., Flyer, F. Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21, 1175-1193. [9] Chung, W., Kanins, A.. Agglomeration effects and performance: a test of the Texas lodging industry. Strategic Management Journal [J], 2001, 22, 969-988. [10] Nadler DA, Tushman ML. Strategic Organizational Design [M]. HarperCollins: New York, 1988. [11] Shan W, Hamilton W. Country-specific advantage and international cooperation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, 12(6): 419432. [12] Hall M, Weiss L. Firm size and profitability [J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1967, 49: 319-331. [13] Freeman J, Carroll GR, Hannan MT. The liabilities of newness: age dependence in organizational death rates [J]. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48: 692-7 10. [14] Singh JV, Tucker DJ, House RJ. Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31: 17 1-193. [15] Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A. Fortune favors the prepared firm [J]. Management Science, 1994, 40, 227-251. [16] Baum, J.A.C., Haveman, H.A. Love thy neighbor? Differentiation and agglomeration in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898-1990 [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42, 304-338. [17] Furman, J.L. Location and organizing strategy: exploring the influence of location on the organization of pharmaceutical research [J]. Advances in Strategic Management, 2003, 20, 49-88. [18] Bresnahan, T., Gambardella, A., Saxenian, A. Old economy inputs for 'new economy' outcomes: cluster formation in the new silicon valleys [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2001, 10, 835-860. [19] Niosi, J., Bas, T.G. The competencies of regions-Canada's clusters in biotechnology [J]. Small Business Economics, 2001, 17, 31-42. [20] Rosenkopf, L., Nerkar, A. Beyond local search: boundary-spanning, exploration and impact in the optical disc industry [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22, 287-306. [21] 杨震宁,吕萍,王以华. 科学学研究[J],2007, 25(5). [22] Malecki, E.J. Industrial location and corporate organization in high technology industries [J]. Economic Geography, 1985, 61, 345-369. [23] Gilbert, B.A., Audretsch, D.B., McDougall, P.P. The emergence of entrepreneurship policy [J]. Small Business Economics, 2004, 22 (3-4), 313-323.