科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 46-56.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.09.005

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

数智时代下的网络综合治理：研究综述与展望

闫强，蒋婷，魏娜，易兰丽   

  1. 北京邮电大学经济管理学院，北京100876
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-21 修回日期:2025-06-11 出版日期:2025-09-20 发布日期:2025-09-09
  • 通讯作者: 魏娜
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金面上项目：“中国地方数据治理机构的协同模式研究”（24BZZ076，2024.09—2027.07）；北京邮电大学引进人才科研启动项目“基于多主体协同的网络综合治理生态构建研究”（510224049，2023.09—2026.12）；国家数据局2025年重大课题项目：“国家数据基础设施建设运营若干重大问题研究”（SJ-kj2025002，2025.05—2025.12）。

Comprehensive cyber governance in the digital-intelligent era: A research review and prospects

Yan Qiang, Jiang Ting, Wei Na, Yi Lanli   

  1. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
  • Received:2024-08-21 Revised:2025-06-11 Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-09-09

摘要：     健全网络综合治理体系是推动我国网络强国战略的重要课题。2024年是习近平总书记提出网络强国战略目标10周年，也是我国全功能接入国际互联网的30周年。在此历史节点上，系统梳理国内外网络综合治理研究的演进路径与理论逻辑，具有重要的理论价值与现实意义。本文基于对“网络综合治理”概念的界定，对国内外高水平期刊发表的507篇文献进行系统梳理。研究发现，国内研究起步较早且成果更为系统，主要呈现出三个阶段的演进：法律框架下的探索式刚性管控、政府主导下的协同式监管，以及多主体参与下的综合治理。进一步，本文借助结构功能主义的AGIL模型，构建了“目标达成—整合—适应—模式维系”的研究框架，系统归纳出网络综合治理研究的四个核心主题：生成逻辑与内涵建构（目标达成功能）、治理主体与工具的内部作用机制（整合功能）、治理模式与路径探索（适应功能）以及治理效能评估体系构建（模式维系功能）。最后，结合ChatGPT、DeepSeek等数智技术对网络空间带来的治理挑战，展望了协同机制的实证建模、数智技术的双重属性分析、治理路径的动态适配及评估体系的智能转型等研究方向。研究结果对于完善网络综合治理的理论研究，健全网络综合治理体系具有重要的理论意义和实践指导。

关键词: 网络综合治理, 理论框架, 结构功能主义, 数智化, 研究展望

Abstract:    Strengthening the comprehensive cyber governance system is a critical research focus for advancing China′s strategy of becoming a global cyber power. The year 2024 marks both the 10th anniversary of General Secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee Xi Jinping′s proposal of the cyber power strategy and the 30th anniversary of China′s full access to the global cyber. At this critical historical juncture, reviewing systematically the evolutionary path and theoretical logic of comprehensive cyber governance research holds significant theoretical and practical values. Based on a conceptual definition of "comprehensive cyber governance", this study made a systematic review of 507 high-quality journal papers published domestically and internationally. The findings revealed that domestic research emerged earlier and demonstrated more systematic outcomes, evolving through three distinct phases: exploratory rigid control under a legal framework, government-led collaborative regulation, and multi-stakeholder comprehensive governance. Furthermore, leveraging Parsons′ AGIL model from structural functionalism, this study constructed a research framework comprising goal attainment, integration, adaptation, and latency, synthesizing four core themes in comprehensive cyber governance research: generative logic and conceptual construction; internal mechanisms of governance actors and tools; governance models and pathway exploration; and efficacy evaluation systems. Finally, in light of governance challenges posed by digital-intelligent technologies (e.g., ChatGPT, DeepSeek), future research directions were proposed, including empirical modeling of collaborative mechanisms, dual-attribute analysis of digital-intelligent technologies, dynamic adaptation of governance pathways, and AI-driven transformation of evaluation systems. The results will contribute to advancing theoretical research on comprehensive cyber governance and provide practical insights for strengthening governance frameworks.

Key words: comprehensive cyber governance, theoretical framework, structural functionalism, digital-intelligence integration, research prospect