科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 121-129.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.04.013

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

角色重构视角下的学术创业模式差异性机理研究

李大海1，孙文慧2，于会娟1,2，单菁竹1，孙杨2   

  1. 1.中国海洋大学海洋发展研究院，山东 青岛266100；
    2.中国海洋大学管理学院，山东 青岛266100

  • 收稿日期:2022-11-07 修回日期:2023-11-14 出版日期:2024-04-20 发布日期:2024-04-07
  • 通讯作者: 于会娟
  • 基金资助:
    山东省重点研发计划（软科学）重点项目：“山东海洋高新技术产业园区建设体系研究”（2022RZB04027，2022.10—2023.10）。

Research on the mechanisms of variability in academic entrepreneurial models from the perspective of role reconstruction

Li Dahai1, Sun Wenhui2, Yu Huijuan1,2, Shan Jingzhu1, Sun Yang2   

  1. 1. Institute of Marine Development, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, China; 
    2. College of Management, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, China
  • Received:2022-11-07 Revised:2023-11-14 Online:2024-04-20 Published:2024-04-07

摘要：    学术创业包括多种类型，是推动科技成果转化的重要方式。加强学术创业模式差异化成因、相互关系和转换机制的研究，具有理论和政策应用价值。运用案例研究方法，基于角色认同、注意力基础观、资源编排等理论，从注意力分配结构、资源编排方式、行为三方面维度，解释学术创业模式差异性的原因。从动态过程视角，探究角色重构与学术创业行为之间的关联性。研究发现，学术创业多种类型可由学术创业者角色认同、注意力焦点和资源编排方式三个维度特征来界定。学术创业者的自我角色认同是决定其学术创业行为的根本因素。学术创业是一个动态过程，学术创业者在接触和了解市场过程中推动角色重构，选择合适的学术创业方式。角色重构过程中，由于价值导向、资源编排模式转换，促使其学术创业具体方式发生转变。本研究创新性地构建分析模型解释学术创业模式多样性的原因，以及各类模式的内在关联，描述学术创业模式转换的时序性特征及驱动机制，深化了对学术创业发展规律的认知，对于进一步优化学术创业政策环境具有借鉴价值。

关键词: 学术创业, 角色认同, 注意力基础观, 资源编排

Abstract:     Academic entrepreneurship encompasses various types and serves as a significant mechanism for driving the transformation of scientific and technological achievements. Investigating the origins, interrelations, and transformation mechanisms of academic entrepreneurship holds vital theoretical and policy implications. This study employed a case study approach and drew upon such theories as role identification, attention-based view, and resource orchestration to explain the reasons for the diversity in academic entrepreneurship from three aspects: attention allocation structure, resource allocation methods and behavior. From a dynamic process perspective, it investigated the relationship between role reconstruction and academic entrepreneurial behavior. The results revealed that different types of academic entrepreneurship can be defined by three-dimensional characteristics, namely, the role identity of academic entrepreneurs, their attention focus, and resource allocation methods. The self-identity of academic entrepreneurs stands as the fundamental determinant of their academic entrepreneurial behavior. Academic entrepreneurship is a dynamic process, and academic entrepreneurs drive role reconstruction while engaging with and understanding the market, ultimately selecting an appropriate academic entrepreneurial approach. In the process of role reconstruction, value orientations and the transformation of resource allocation patterns lead to shifts in the specific modes of academic entrepreneurship. This study innovatively constructed an analysis model to explain the reasons for the diversity of academic entrepreneurship models and the internal correlation of various models, described the timing characteristics and driving mechanism of the transformation of academic entrepreneurship models, deepened the understanding of the development law of academic entrepreneurship, thus having some reference values for further optimizing the policy environment of academic entrepreneurship.

Key words: academic entrepreneurship, role identification, attention-based view, resource orchestration