借助沪深港通场景,利用2008—2019年A股上市公司数据,通过多期倍差模型检验了股票市场开放对企业研发国际化的影响。结果表明:股票市场开放促进企业参与研发国际化活动,且主要通过外国投资者的价值信息需求促使企业形成长期视野而实现,即“迎合效应”。进一步检验发现,上述政策效果对东部地区企业更显著,主要促进企业在美国以外地区开展的研发国际化活动。本文建议,政府应重点完善外国投资者关系管理,探索基于互联网的投资者互动形式,同时继续降低外资准入门槛,加强外资权益保障。
Abstract
As economic globalization faces growing headwinds and the world changes at an ever-accelerating pace, many multinational companies (especially Chinese latecomers from emerging economies) are encountering frustrating layers of obstruction in their global research and development (R&D) layout. To this end, the Chinese government adheres to its confirmed basic state policy of opening up to the outside world, counteracting the trend of counter-globalization, and helping Chinese companies innovate (notwithstanding this severe international situation) by using a high level of openness to get stronger technological, human, and financial support. As an important institutional innovation to promote China′s sustained opening to the rest of the world, the interoperability mechanism of stock market transactions represented by the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect and the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect (the SH-SZ-HK stock connect) has attracted much more cross-border capital. This promises to carve out an increasingly prominent role for investors from developed capital markets like Europe, and the U.S. to help develop Chinese enterprises. This paper will, therefore, focus upon this question: Can stock market liberalization overcome the dilemmas associated with counter-globalization, and facilitate Chinese companies′ participation in R&D internationalization activities?
This paper will demonstrate that stock market liberalization has both theoretical contributions and practical solutions to R&D internationalization. When choosing which stocks to purchase, foreign investors avoid those whose growth prospects are hard to determine. This incentivizes companies to plan and disclose their strategic information on R&D and internationalization, thus gradually developing a long-term perspective and increasing the need to allocate resources for R&D internationalization, i.e. the "catering effect". After successfully buying an underlying stock, foreign investors who practice value investing actively provide these companies with capital and knowledge to help ensure the smooth implementation of R&D internationalization projects, i.e. the "resource effect". In fact, foreign investors not be able to drive companies to participate in R&D internationalization. Unlike mature Western capital markets, China′s capital market is in a state of transition and lacks transparency for market information, making it difficult for foreign investors who already have a local information disadvantage to ascertain the truth and falsity of the companies′ public information.
Unfortunately, a few scholars have discussed how stock market liberalization impacts local business innovation, but there is almost a gap in the evidence for the internationalization of R&D. In addition, there are endogeneity problems in the research design of existing literature that are difficult to overcome, -e.g., biased estimates due to omitted variables like culture and the law in cross-country studies, and whether a country′s decision to open its stock market is dependent on the level of domestic economic development or the maturity of its financial system, i.e., a two-way causality. Therefore, whether stock market liberalization can promote the internationalization of corporate R&D needs to be supported by rigorous theoretical and empirical evidence.
Given the successive implementation of the SH-SZ-HK stock connect scenario, the impact of stock market liberalization on the internationalization of corporate R&D was reviewed using time-varying Difference in Differences model that relied on data from A-share listed companies over the period 2008-2019. The results demonstrated that stock market liberalization promotes firms′ participation in R&D internationalization, mainly through the demand for value information from foreign investors, which induce firms to develop long-term perspectives, i.e. the "catering effect". Further testing also found the effect was more pronounced for firms in the eastern part of China, mainly promoting R&D internationalization outside the US.
The marginal contributions of this paper include: (1) applying the impact of stock market liberalization on corporate behavior to analysis of R&D internationalization—a particularly key issue for Chinese companies looking to catch up with technology and to leapfrogging develop; and (2) taking Chinese scenarios such as investor structure, firm characteristics, and institutional environment, this paper proposes two paths for foreign investors to influence the internationalization of corporate R&D, i.e. the "catering effect" and the "resource effect", to reveal the impact of foreign investors′ transition from ‘outsiders’ to ‘insiders’ on the business; and (3) the empirical research relies upon the successive SH-SZ-HK stock connect scenario to fill the endogeneity gap in existing studies. Finally, this paper will suggest that the Chinese government should focus upon improving foreign investor relations management and explore internet-based forms of investor interaction, while continuing to lower the threshold for foreign investment entry, and strengthen the protection of foreign investors′ rights and interests.
关键词
股票市场开放 /
研发国际化 /
沪深港通
Key words
stock market liberalization /
R&D internationalization /
SH-SZ-HK stock connect
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 钟覃琳, 陆正飞. 资本市场开放能提高股价信息含量吗?——基于“沪港通”效应的实证检验[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(1): 169-179.
[2] 陈运森, 黄健峤. 股票市场开放与企业投资效率——基于“沪港通”的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 62(8): 151-170.
[3] 连立帅, 朱松, 陈关亭. 资本市场开放、非财务信息定价与企业投资——基于沪深港通交易制度的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(8): 136-154.
[4] 连立帅, 朱松, 陈超. 资本市场开放与股价对企业投资的引导作用: 基于沪港通交易制度的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019, 37(3): 100-118.
[5] 余威, 宁博. 交叉上市、投资者关注与企业创新——基于沪深A股上市公司的实证研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(1): 50-63.
[6] Luong H, Moshirian F, Nguyen L, Tian X, Zhang B. How do foreign institutional investors enhance firm innovation[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2017, 52(4): 1449-1490.
[7] Moshirian F, Tian X, Zhang B, Zhang W. Stock market liberalization and innovation[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2020, 136(8): 1-30.
[8] Piotroski J D, Wong T J. Institutions and information environment of Chinese listed firms[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012: 201-242.
[9] Kerr J N. Transparency, information shocks, and tax avoidance[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2019, 36(2): 1146-1183.
[10] 万源星, 许永斌. 高新认定办法、研发操纵与企业技术创新效率[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(4): 54-62.
[11] Bae K H, Chan K, Ng A. Investibility and return volatility[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2004, 71(2): 239-263.
[12] Mitton T. Stock market liberalization and operating performance at the firm level[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 81(3): 625-647.
[13] Zhong K, Sun C, Wang H, and Wei S. Stock market liberalization and firm-level stock price crash risk-evidence from 'Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect' scheme[R]. SSRN Working Paper, 2019.
[14] Hope O, Deng Y, Wang C, Zhang M. Capital-market liberalization and auditors' accounting adjustments: Evidence from a quasi-experiment[J]. SSRN Working Paper, 2020.
[15] 周冬华, 方瑄, 黄文德. 境外投资者与高质量审计需求——来自沪港通政策实施的证据[J]. 审计研究, 2018, 34(6): 56-64.
[16] 邹洋, 张瑞君, 孟庆斌, 侯德帅. 资本市场开放能抑制上市公司违规吗?——来自“沪港通”的经验证据[J]. 中国软科学, 2019, 34(8): 120-134.
[17] 李梅, 余天骄. 研发国际化是否促进了企业创新——基于中国信息技术企业的经验研究[J]. 管理世界, 2016, 32(11): 125-140.
[18] Edmans A. Blockholders and corporate governance[J]. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2014, 6(1): 23-50.
[19] Kim J B, Yi C H. Foreign versus domestic institutional investors in emerging markets: Who contributes more to firm-specific information flow[J]. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2015, 8(1): 1-23.
[20] 王春元, 叶伟巍. 税收优惠与企业自主创新: 融资约束的视角[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(3): 37-44.
[21] Almeida H, Campello M. Financial constraints, asset tangibility, and corporate investment[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2007, 20(5): 1429-1460.
[22] Kafouros M, Wang C, Mavroudi E, Hong J, Katsikeas C S. Geographic dispersion and co-location in global R&D portfolios: Consequences for firm performance[J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(7): 1243-1255.
[23] Choe H, Kho B C, Stulz R M. Do Domestic investors have an edge? The trading experience of foreign investors in Korea[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2005, 18(3): 795-829.
[24] Kmenta J. Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion[J]. Economic Record, 2010, 45(1): 75-76.
[25] Yoon A. Shaping of private disclosure in weak institutions: Evidence from a market liberalization in China[J]. SSRN Working Paper, 2019.
基金
国家自然科学基金重点国际合作研究项目(71810107004,2019.01—2023.12);国家自然科学基金面上项目(L1924081,2020.01.01—2021.12.31);国家自然科学基金青年项目(72002198,2021.01—2023.12)。