组态视角下平台企业商业模式创新路径研究

熊爱华 侯德恩

科研管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12) : 89-97.

科研管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12) : 89-97.
论文

组态视角下平台企业商业模式创新路径研究

  • 熊爱华,侯德恩
作者信息 +

Research on the business model innovation path of platform enterprises from the perspective of configuration

  • Xiong Aihua, Hou De′en
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为探索多重条件并发对平台企业商业模式创新的影响,基于机会资源一体观构建商业模式创新路径模型,通过对193个样本进行模糊集定性比较分析发现:平台企业商业模式创新路径形成依赖机会开发和资源联动层面要素的组合;机会开发和资源联动层面不同要素的组合形成两类商业模式创新路径,类型1强调模仿型机会开发与资源联动策略组合,类型2强调创新型机会开发与资源联动策略组合;机会开发适配的资源联动方式存在差异,其中模仿型机会开发与资源共享和资源编排匹配良好,而创新型机会开发与资源编排、资源拓展匹配良好。研究结论揭示了平台企业商业模式创新多条等效路径,丰富了商业模式创新前因研究,也为平台企业商业模式创新实践提供了理论指导。

Abstract

With the in-depth implementation of China′s innovation-driven strategy, the pace of business model innovation of platform enterprises has been accelerating, resulting in huge economic benefits and social value. The typical business model innovation of platform enterprises in the digital economy era represented by Alibaba, Jingdong and Meituan was born. However, in recent years, many platform enterprises have lagged behind in business model innovation. The reason for this phenomenon is that platform enterprises have one-sided understanding of business models and fail to promote business model innovation effectively. Therefore, how to drive business model innovation has become an important issue for the sustainable growth of platform enterprises and the effective implementation of China′s digital economy strategy.The existing research on business model innovation of platform enterprises focuses on the two major themes of innovation antecedents and process. Foss and Luo pointed out in their research that innovation is a necessary and important proposition for the value creation of platform enterprises in the Internet era. On this basis, Feng described the modules of revenue model, value creation and factor support in the process of business model innovation from the perspective of space-time fit in the context of the Internet. Most of the existing studies are based on two perspectives of resources and opportunities to examine the influencing factors of business model innovation. Resource perspective research emphasizes the close relationship between data resources, complementary assets, redundant resources and management, resource orchestration and business model innovation. The opportunity perspective focuses on the impact of cross-border search and complementary market entry on business model innovation. To sum up, the existing studies still have the following three limitations: (1) The existing studies mainly examine the "net effect" between variables based on the assumption of linear relationship, which can′t explain the complex causal mechanism between multiple factors, nor can they meet the needs of current non-linear management. (2) Although the existing studies point out that opportunities and resources are closely related to the business model innovation of platform enterprises, most of them focus on the perspective of a single resource or opportunity, and discuss its impact on the business model innovation of platform enterprises from a single element level, ignoring the synergy of opportunities and resources. (3) In recent years, although strategic scholars have gradually paid attention to the impact of opportunity exploitation and resource co-development on business model innovation of different natures, such as efficiency and novelty of platform enterprises, and tried to explain it from the aspects of heterogeneous demand and cross-border operation in bilateral or multilateral markets, they still have not fully revealed the logic and effect of innovation, which needs to be further explored.In view of this, based on the concept of integration of opportunity and resources, this paper integrates five elements of opportunity exploitation and resource co-development to construct a business model innovation path model, and takes 193 platform enterprises as sample cases to investigate the complex causal mechanism by using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis method. The results show that the formation of business model innovation path of platform enterprises depends on the combination of elements at the level of opportunity exploitation and resource co-development, and the configuration of different elements at the level of opportunity exploitation and resource co-development forms two types of business model innovation path: Type 1 emphasizes the combination of imitative opportunity exploitation strategy and resource co-development strategy, while Type 2 emphasizes the combination of innovative opportunity exploitation strategy and resource co-development strategy; There are differences in the resource co-development modes of opportunity exploitation adaptation. Imitative opportunity exploitation matches well with resource sharing and resource orchestration, while innovative opportunity exploitation matches well with resource orchestration and resource extension. The conclusion of the study reveals multiple equivalent paths of business model innovation of platform enterprises, enriches the research on the antecedents of business model innovation, and provides theoretical guidance for the business model innovation practice of platform enterprises.

关键词

平台企业 / 定性比较分析 / 机会开发 / 资源联动 / 商业模式创新

Key words

platform enterprise / qualitative comparative analysis / opportunity exploitation / resource co-development / business model innovation

引用本文

导出引用
熊爱华 侯德恩. 组态视角下平台企业商业模式创新路径研究[J]. 科研管理. 2022, 43(12): 89-97
Xiong Aihua, Hou De′en. Research on the business model innovation path of platform enterprises from the perspective of configuration[J]. Science Research Management. 2022, 43(12): 89-97

参考文献

[1]猎云网: 2019年创业公司死亡名[EB/OL].https://www.lieyunwang.com/archives/461766. 2019-12-16.[J].2019年创业公司死亡名, 000, 00(0):0-0
[2]Hinz O, Otter T, Skiera B.Estimating Network Effects in Two-Sided Markets[J].Journal of Management information systems, 2020, 37(1):12-38
[3]Eisenmann T, Parker G, Alstyne M W V.Strategy for two-sided markets[J].Harvard Business Review, 2006, 43(2):92-101
[4]田剑, 徐佳斌.平台型企业商业模式创新驱动因素研究[J].科学学研究, 2020, 38(5):949-960
[5]Shane S, Venkataraman S.The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research[J].Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25(1):217-226
[6]Amit R, Zott C.Value creation in E-Business[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(6-7):493-520
[7]马鸿佳, 吴娟, 郭海, 葛宝山.创业领域即兴行为研究:前因、结果及边界条件[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(5):211-229
[8]孙永波, 丁沂昕, 王楠.资源拼凑与创业机会认知的对接路径[J].科研管理, 2021, 42(02):130-137
[9]吴晓波, 赵子溢.商业模式创新的前因问题:研究综述与展望[J].外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(1):114-127
[10]云乐鑫, 杨俊, 张玉利.创业企业如何实现商业模式内容创新?——基于“网络-学习”双重机制的跨案例研究[J].管理世界, 2017, 283(4):119-137
[11]Lumpkin G.T,,Benyamin,et alThe Role of Organizational Learning in the Opportunity–Recognition Process[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2017, 29(4):451-472
[12]Jintong T A K, Michele M K bb.Lowell Busenitz cEntrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities-ScienceDirect[J].Journal of Business Venturing, 2012, 27(1):77-94
[13]Suddaby R, Bruton G D, Si S X.Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: Insights on the construction andor discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity[J].Journal of Business Venturing, 2015, 30(1):1-10
[14]Korsgaard S.It's really out there: A review of the critique of the discovery view of opportunities[J].International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 2013, 19(1-2):130-148
[15]蔡莉, 鲁喜凤, 单标安, 于海晶.发现型机会和创造型机会能够相互转化吗?——基于多主体视角的研究[J].管理世界, 2018, 34(12):81-94
[16]Gregoire D A, Shepherd D A.Technology-Market combinations and the identification of entrepreneurial opportunities: An Investigation of the opportunity-individual nexus[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(4):753-785
[17]刘佳, 李新春.模仿还是创新:创业机会开发与创业绩效的实证研究[J].南方经济, 2013, 289(10):20-32
[18]Benner M J, Tushman M.Process management and technological Innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 2002, 47(4):676-706
[19]张璐, 梁丽娜, 苏敬勤, 等.破茧成蝶:创业企业如何突破能力的刚性束缚实现进阶[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(6):189-201
[20]葛宝山, 续媞特.左右互搏:创业机会与资源共生演化机理研究[J].科学学研究, 2020, 38(08):1417-1427
[21]Freiling J.Editorial: Business model innovation – A concept between organizational renewal and industry transformation[J].Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Innovation, 2015, 11(1):3-10
[22]Yli-Renko H, Autio E, Sapienza H J.Social capital,knowledge acquisition and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(6-7):587-613
[23]Sonenshein S.How organizations foster the creative use of resources[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(3):814-848
[24]Kannamouzha M J, Suoranta M.Bricolage in the marketing efforts of a social enterprise[J].Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 2016, 18(2):176-196
[25]周飞, 沙振权, 孙锐.市场导向、资源拼凑与商业模式创新的关系研究[J].科研管理, 2019, 40(1):113-120
[26]Baert C, Meuleman M, Debruyne M, et al.Portfolio entrepreneurship and resource orchestration[J].Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2016, 10(4):346-370
[27]Chadwick C, Super J F, KWON K.Resource orchestration in practice: CEO emphasis on SHR M,commitment-based HR systems,and firm performance[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2014, 36(3):360-376
[28]Bridoux F.Smith KG. Grimm C. M. The Management of Resources: Temporal Effects of Different Types of Actionson Performance[J].Journal of Management, 2013, 39(4):928-957
[29]Sirmon D G, Hitt M A, Ireland R D,et al.Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth,depth,and life cycle effects[J].Journal of Management, 2011, 37(5):1390-1412
[30]Sirmon D.G. Hitt MA. Ireland R. D. Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value Look-ing Inside the Black Box[J].Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1):273-292
[31]苏敬勤, 林菁菁, 张雁鸣.创业企业资源行动演化路径及机理——从拼凑到协奏[J].科学学研究, 2017, 35(11):1659-1672
[32]Manolova T S, Edelman L F, Brush C G, et al.Properties of emerging organizations: Empirical evidence from norway[J].Small Business Economics, 2012, 39(3):763-781
[33]Johnson M W, Christensen C M, Kagermann H.Reinventing your business model[J].Harvard Business Review, 2008, 86(12):51-59
[34]Walsh J P, Kress J C, Beyerchen K W.The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits- by CK. Prahalad[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 2005, 50(3):473-482
[35]Ahuja G, Katila R.Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25(8-9):887-907
[36]Fiss P C.Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(2):393-420
[37]杜运周, 贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析:管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界, 2017, 33(6):155-167
[38]Zahra S A, Bogner W C.Technology strategy and software new ventures' performance: Exploring the moderating effect of the competitive environment[J].Journal of Business Venturing, 1996, 16(4):289-321
[39]Senyard J M, Baker T, Steffens P, et al.Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(2):211-230
[40]祝振铎, 李非.创业拼凑、关系信任与新企业绩效实证研究[J].科研管理, 2017, 38(7):108-116
[41]Andrews R, Beynon M J, McDermott A F.Organizational capability in the public sector: A configurational approach[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2016, 26(2):239-258
[42]朱晓红, 陈寒松, 张腾.知识经济背景下平台型企业构建过程中的迭代创新模式——基于动态能力视角的双案例研究[J].管理世界, 2019, 35(3):142-156
[43]张明, 陈伟宏, 蓝海林.中国企业“凭什么”完全并购境外高新技术企业——基于个案例的模糊集定性比较分析[J].中国工业经济, 2019, 37(4):117-135

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目(71672101,2017—2021);山东省社会科学规划研究基金资助重点项目(21BGLJO2,2021—2023);山东省人文社会科学项目(2020-NDGL-08,2020—2022)。

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/