新创科技企业面临着环境不确定性和资源约束问题，难以有效推动产品创新。效果推理为不确定环境下的决策问题提供了新的思路，因此本研究将效果推理理论运用于新创科技企业的创新活动中，研究效果推理对新创科技企业创新的影响。基于对我国162家新创科技企业的调查研究发现：效果推理对创新速度有显著的正向影响，市场动态性与企业吸收能力均会增强该积极作用。效果推理与创新质量有显著的倒U型关系，市场动态性会增强这一关系，使得倒U型曲线变得更加陡峭；同时，当市场动态性与企业吸收能力都高时，效果推理对创新质量的积极作用最强。本研究区分了不同维度的创新绩效，探究了效果推理对创新的作用，对相关理论作出补充，同时也为新创科技企业创新提供实践借鉴。
Abstract
China is in a critical stage of economic transformation and upgrading, and technological innovation is an important means of industrial upgrading. New technology ventures are effective carriers to accelerate the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, promote industrial transformation and upgrading, and realize technological innovation. However, new technology ventures face high environmental uncertainty and resource constraints, which seriously hinder the promotion of innovation activities. How to deal with these problems effectively and make rational innovation decisions to improve innovation performance has become the key to promote the development of new technology ventures. Effectuation provides a new way of thinking for decision-making in uncertain environment. It describes how to think, make decisions and practice under uncertainty, including a series of principles such as flexibility, affordable loss, previous commitment and experiment.However, there is no consistent conclusion on the effect of effectuation on the innovation performance. It needs further study. Does effectuation have an inconsistent effect on the innovation speed and innovation quality of new technology ventures? Does effectuation work differently in different market environments? What are the internal conditions for the effective application of effectuation? Based on the above problems, this paper constructs a theoretical framework to explore the different effects of effectuation on the innovation speed and innovation quality of new technology ventures, and also considers the moderating effect of the external market dynamism and the internal absorptive capacity of enterprises.This study collected data through questionnaires, and collected 162 valid questionnaires through surveys of new technology ventures in Sichuan, Chongqing, Hunan and Jiangsu. Through data analysis, it is obtained that: (1) effectuation has a significant positive effect on the innovation speed of new technology ventures; (2) there is a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between effectuation and innovation quality of new technology ventures; (3) in the environment of high market dynamism, effectuation has a stronger positive effect on the innovation speed, and the inverted U-shaped relationship between effectuation and innovation quality is stronger; (4) the stronger the absorptive capacity of enterprises, the stronger the positive effect of effectuation and innovation speed; and (5) when both market dynamism and corporate absorptive capacity are high, effectuation has the strongest positive effect on innovation quality.This paper expands the study of effectuation and innovation. In the past, the research on effectuation and innovation did not get a consistent conclusion. This study divides the innovation performance into two dimensions of innovation speed and innovation quality, and found a way to reconcile existing conflicts. Besides, in the past, the literatures mainly considered the moderating effect of external environmental uncertainty on effectuation and innovation, ignored the internal conditions of utilizing effectuation, and this study considers the moderating effect of external market dynamism and internal absorptive capacity, and expands the boundary conditions for utilizing effectuation.Practically，the results of this study have important implications for the innovation of new technology ventures. Firstly, this study confirms the positive effect of effectuation on the innovation of new technology ventures, they should create a free, open and inclusive enterprise atmosphere, for utilizing effectuation to provide a good environment. Secondly, decision makers should use effectuation rationally according to the strategic needs of enterprises. If the enterprise pays more attention to the innovation speed, it needs to follow the effectuation more; if they pay more attention to the innovation quality, they should also pay attention to avoid the negative effect of over-effectuation while utilizing effectuation to improve the innovation quality. Then, decision makers should make reasonable use of effectuation at the different stages of entrepreneurship. Finally, while utilizing effectuation to improve the innovation performance in highly uncertain environment, they should also pay attention to improve the absorptive capacity of enterprises, so that the effect of effectuation will be better.
关键词
效果推理 /
新创科技企业 /
创新速度 /
创新质量
Key words
effectuation /
new technology venture /
innovation speed /
innovation quality
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]Ganotakis P. Founders’ human capital and the performance of UK new technology based firms[J]. Small Business Economics, 2012, 39(2):495-515.
[2]Rita, Gunther, McGrath. Falling Forward: Real Options Reasoning and Entrepreneurial Failure[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999.
[3]Sarasvathy, S. D . CAUSATION AND EFFECTUATION: TOWARD A THEORETICAL SHIFT FROM ECONOMIC INEVITABILITY TO ENTREPRENEURIAL CONTINGENCY.[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26(2):243-263.
[4]Brettel M , René Mauer, Engelen A , et al. Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2012, 27(2):0-184.
[5]崔连广,张玉利,何一清.效果推理理论视角下企业创新与绩效提升机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(09):68-79.
Cui Lianguang, Zhang Yuli, he Yiqing. Research on enterprise innovation and performance improvement mechanism from the perspective of effect reasoning theory [J]. Science and technology management, 2017,38 (09): 68-79
[6]Liang Wu , Heng Liu , Kun Su. Exploring the dual effect of effectuation on new product development speed and quality[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020.
[7]Stuart, Read, Nicholas. Marketing Under Uncertainty: The Logic Of An Effectual Approach[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2009.
[8]Barney J B . Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage[J]. Advances in Strategic Management, 1991, 17(1):3-10.
[9]Berends H , Jelinek M , Reymen I , et al. Product Innovation Processes in Small Firms: Combining Entrepreneurial Effectuation and Managerial Causation[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(3):616-635.
[10]Stewart W H , Roth P L . Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analytic review.[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(1):145-153.
[11]Atuahene-Gima K , Haiyang L I . STRATEGIC DECISION COMPREHENSIVENESS AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES IN NEW TECHNOLOGY VENTURES[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(4):583-597.
[12]Atuahene-Gima K , Wei Y . The Vital Role of Problem-Solving Competence in New Product Success[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2011, 28(1):81-98.
[13]Chen J , Damanpour F , Reilly R R . Understanding Antecedents of New Product Development Speed: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing.
[14]杨幽红.创新质量理论框架:概念、内涵和特点[J].科研管理,2013,34(S1):320-325.
Yang Youhong. Theoretical framework of innovation quality: concept, connotation and characteristics [J]. Scientific research management, 2013,34 (S1): 320-325
[15]Cao X , Im J . Founder human capital and new technology venture R&D search intensity: the moderating role of an environmental jolt[J]. Small Business Economics, 2017.
[16]Cai L , Guo R , Fei Y , et al. Effectuation, Exploratory Learning and New Venture Performance: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2017, 55(3):388-403.
[17]Wu L , Liu H , Zhang J . Bricolage effects on new-product development speed and creativity: The moderating role of technological turbulence[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 70.
[18]Julie Juan Li, Laura Poppo, Kevin Zheng Zhou. Do managerial ties in China always produce value? Competition, uncertainty, and domestic vs. foreign firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(4):383-400.
[19]Arend, R. J., Sarooghi, H., & Burkemper, A. Effectuation as ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 2015, 40(4), 630–651.
[20]Lin H , Zeng S , Liu H , et al. How do intermediaries drive corporate innovation? A moderated mediating examination[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016.
[21]Sun P , Mellahi K , Wright M . The Contingent Value of Corporate Political Ties[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2012, 26(3):68-82.
[22]简兆权,吴隆增,黄静.吸收能力、知识整合对组织创新和组织绩效的影响研究[J].科研管理,2008(01):80-86+96.
Jian Zhaoquan, Wu longzeng, Huang Jing. Research on the influence of absorptive capacity and knowledge integration on organizational innovation and organizational performance [J]. Scientific research management, 2008 (01): 80-86 + 96
[23]张振刚,陈志明,李云健.开放式创新、吸收能力与创新绩效关系研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(03):49-56.
Zhang Zhengang, Chen Zhiming, Li Yunjian. Research on the relationship between open innovation, absorptive capacity and innovation performance [J]. Scientific research management, 2015,36 (03): 49-56
[24]Jansen J J P , Van D B F A J , Volberda H W . MANAGING POTENTIAL AND REALIZED ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: HOW DO ORGANIZATIONAL ANTECEDENTS MATTER?[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(6):999-1015.
[25]Chandler, G. N., Detienne, D. R., Mckelvie, A., & Mumford, T. V. Causation and effffectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 2011,26(3), 375–390.
[26]邹旸,崔连广,闫旭.效果逻辑形成机制研究:自我效能的中介作用[J].科研管理,2019,40(07):224-234.
Zou Yang, Cui Lianguang, Yan Xu. Study on the formation mechanism of effect logic: the intermediary role of self-efficacy [J]. Scientific research management, 2019,40 (07): 224-234
[27]Flatten T C , Engelen A , Zahra S A , et al. A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation[J]. European management journal, 2011, 29(2):p.98-116.
[28]钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效——一个交互效应模型[J].管理世界,2010(05):118-129.
Qian Xihong, Yang Yongfu, Xu Wanli. Enterprise network location, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: an interactive effect model [J]. Management world, 2010 (05): 118-129
[29]叶江峰,任浩,郝斌.外部知识异质度对创新绩效曲线效应的内在机理——知识重构与吸收能力的视角[J].科研管理,2016,37(08):8-17.
Ye Jiangfeng, Ren Hao, Hao bin. The internal mechanism of the effect of external knowledge heterogeneity on innovation performance curve -- the perspective of knowledge reconstruction and absorptive capacity [J]. Scientific research management, 2016,37 (08): 8-17
[30]Jaworski B J , Kohli A K . Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1993, 57(3):53-71.
[31]Shankar, Ganesan, Alan, et al. Does Distance Still Matter? Geographic Proximity and New Product Development[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2005.
[32]严焰,池仁勇.R&D投入、技术获取模式与企业创新绩效——基于浙江省高技术企业的实证[J].科研管理,2013,34(05):48-55.
Yan Yan, Chi Renyong. R & D investment, technology acquisition mode and enterprise innovation performance: Based on the empirical study of high-tech enterprises in Zhejiang Province [J]. Scientific research management, 2013,34 (05): 48-55
[33]Yam R , Lo W , Tang Y , et al. Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries[J]. Research Policy, 2011, 40(3):391-402.
[34]Fornell, Claes, Larcker, David F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981, 18(1):39-50.
[35]Podsakoff, Philip M, MacKenzie, Scott B, Lee, Jeong-Yeon,et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88(5):879-903.
[36]Lind J T , Mehlum H . With or Without U? The Appropriate Test for a U-Shaped Relationship[J]. oxford bulletin of economics & statistics, 2010, 72(1):109-118.
[37]Haans R F J , Pieters C , He Z L . THINKING ABOUT U: THEORIZING AND TESTING U- AND INVERTED U-SHAPED RELATIONSHIPS IN STRATEGY RESEARCH[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(7):1177-1195.
基金
国家自然科学基金重大项目：“数字创新驱动的新企业创业模式研究”（72091313,2021.01—2025.12）；国家自然科学基金项目：“企业超额盈利持续性中CEO效应度量和影响机制研究”（71872185，2019.01—2022.12）；“逆向国际化企业跨界搜索及其绩效提升机理研究：决策导向视角”（71772166, 2018.01—2021.12）。
